Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 102 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents the measurement of the associated production of a \(\mathrm {W} ^\pm \) boson and a charm quark in 13 TeV pp-collisions, using the data collected by the CMS collaboration in 2016, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.7\(\,\text {fb}^{-1}\). It is the main subject of this thesis, together with the interpretation of the results in terms of the proton structure, presented in Chap. 6.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Campbell JM, Ellis RK (2010) MCFM for the Tevatron and the LHC. Nucl Phys Proc Suppl 205–206:10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2010.08.011. arXiv:1007.3492 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell JM, Keith Ellis R (1999) An update on vector boson pair production at hadron colliders. Phys Rev D 60:113006. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.113006. arXiv:hep-ph/9905386 [hep-ph]

  3. Campbell JM, Keith Ellis R (2015) Top quark processes at NLO in production and decay. J Phys G 42:015005. https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/42/1/015005. arXiv:1204.1513 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Buckley A et al (2013) Rivet user manual. Comput Phys Commun 184:2803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2013.05.021. arXiv:1003.0694 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rovere M (2015) The data quality monitoring software for the CMS experiment at the LHC. J Phys Conf Ser 664(7):072039. http://stacks.iop.org/1742-6596/664/i=7/a=072039

  6. The CMS Collaboration. CMS Luminosity Measurements for the 2016 Data Taking Period. CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001. 2017. http://cds.cern.ch/record/2257069

  7. Agostinelli et al (2003) Geant4 - a simulation toolkit. Nucl Instr Meth A 506:250. ISSN: 0168-9002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900203013688

  8. Ball RD et al (2015) Parton distributions for the LHC Run II. JHEP 04:040. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2015)040. arXiv:1410.8849 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sjöstrand T, Mrenna S, Skands PZ (2008) A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1. Comput Phys Commun 178:852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2008.01.036. arXiv:0710.3820 [hep-ph]

  10. Khachatryan V et al (2016) Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements. Eur Phys J C 76:155. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-3988-x. arXiv:1512.00815 [hep-ex]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Alwall J et al (2014) The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations. JHEP 07:079. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079. arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Frederix R, Frixione S (2012) Merging meets matching in MC@NLO. JHEP 12:061. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2012)061. arXiv:1209.6215 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Campbell JM et al (2015) Top-pair production and decay at NLO matched with parton showers. JHEP 04:114. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2015)114. arXiv:1412.1828 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Investigations of the impact of the parton shower tuning in Pythia 8 in the modelling of tt at ps = 8 and 13 TeV. CMS Physics Analysis Summary (2016). https://cds.cern.ch/record/2235192

  15. Re E (2011) Single-topWt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method. Eur Phys J C 71:1547. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1547-z. arXiv:1009.2450 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Frederix R, Re E, Torrielli P (2012) Single-top t-channel hadroproduction in the four-flavour scheme with POWHEG and aMC@NLO. JHEP 09:130. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2012)130. arXiv:1207.5391 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Alioli S, et al (2009) NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG: s- and t-channel contributions. JHEP 09:111. [Erratum: (2010) JHEP 02:011]. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2010)011, https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2009/09/111. arXiv:0907.4076 [hep-ph]

  18. Particle Data Group, Tanabashi M, et al (2018) Review of particle physics. Phys Rev D 98:030001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.030001

  19. Sirunyan AM, et al (2017) Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector. JINST 12:P10003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/P10003. arXiv:1706.04965 [physics.ins-det]

  20. Sirunyan AM, et al (2018) Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at ps = 13 TeV. JINST 13:P06015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/P06015. arXiv:1804.04528 [physics.ins-det]

  21. Frühwirth R, Waltenberger W, Vanlaer P (2007) Adaptive vertex fitting. Technical report CMS-NOTE-2007-008. https://cds.cern.ch/record/1027031

  22. Chatrchyan S, et al (2014) Description and performance of track and primary vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker. JINST 9:P10009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/P10009. arXiv:1405.6569 [physics.ins-det]

  23. Feldman GJ et al (1977) Observation of the decay \(D{^\ast +} \rightarrow D^0 \pi ^+\). Phys Rev Lett 38:1313. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.1313

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Oreglia MJ (1980) A study of the reactions \(\psi ^{\prime } \rightarrow \gamma \gamma \psi \) ! ". SLAC Report SLAC-R-236. PhD thesis. Stanford University. http://www.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-wrap/getdoc/slac-r-236.pdf

  25. Lisovyi M, Verbytskyi A, Zenaiev O (2016) Combined analysis of charm-quark fragmentation-fraction measurements. Eur Phys J C 76:397. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4246-y. arXiv:1509.01061 [hep-ex]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. The CMS Collaboration. Measurement of tracking efficiency. CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-TRK-10-002 (2010). http://cds.cern.ch/record/1279139

  27. The CMS Collaboration. CMS Tracking POG Performance Plots for year 2016. https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/TrackingPOGPlots2016

  28. The CMS Collaboration. Performance of missing energy reconstruction in 13 TeV pp collision data using the CMS detector. CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-JME-16-004 (2016). https://cds.cern.ch/record/2205284

  29. Aaron FD et al (2009) Study of charm fragmentation into D\(_{\pm }\) mesons in deepinelastic scattering at HERA. Eur Phys J C 59:589. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0792-2. arXiv:0808.1003 [hep-ex]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Andersson B et al (1983) Parton fragmentation and string dynamics. Phys Rept 97:31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(83)90080-7

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bowler MG (1981) \(e^{+}e^{-}\) Production of heavy quarks in the string model. Z Phys C 11:169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01574001

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Alekhin S, Blümlein J, Moch S (2018) NLO PDFs from the ABMP16 fit. Eur Phys J C 78:477. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5947-1. arXiv:1803.07537 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Aaboud RD et al (2017) Precision measurement and interpretation of inclusive \(W^+\), \(W^-\) and \(Z/\gamma *\) production cross sections with the ATLAS detector. Eur Phys J C 77:367. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4911-9. arXiv:1612.03016 [hep-ex]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Dulat S et al (2016) New parton distribution functions from a global analysis of quantum chromodynamics. Phys Rev D 93:033006. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.033006. arXiv:1506.07443 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Harland-Lang LA et al (2015) Parton distributions in the LHC era: MMHT 2014 PDFs. Eur Phys J C 75:204. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3397-6. arXiv:412.3989 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ball RD et al (2017) Parton distributions from high-precision collider data. Eur Phys J C 77:663. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5199-5. arXiv:1706.00428 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Svenja Karen Pflitsch .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pflitsch, S.K. (2020). Measurement of the Associated Production of W + Charm in \(\sqrt{s} = 13\) TeV Proton–Proton Collisions. In: Associated Production of W + Charm in 13 TeV Proton-Proton Collisions Measured with CMS and Determination of the Strange Quark Content of the Proton. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52762-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics