Skip to main content

New Technological Learning Environments: Tensions Between Teaching and Learning in Groups and Consideration of Learning Styles to Improve Quality of Student Experience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quality of Experience and Learning in Information Systems

Part of the book series: EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing ((EAISICC))

Abstract

This chapter explores new technological learning environments, and focuses on distance learning platforms. The chapter considers the student preferences as a factor that can affect user experience metrics. Student preferences can be contradicting in group learning environments, and this can be even more challenging in distance learning environments. The chapter explores student preferences as reflected by individual learning styles and used game theoretic models to investigate the interaction between a teacher and the group of students as well as between the students themselves. The chapter tackles user experience and how this is affected by individual learning characteristics and preferences of the students, and also explores the teacher’s goal of satisfying those student preferences. Given that learning preferences cannot be completely revealed to the teacher, then ways of improving student experience must be investigated. In addition to the teacher perspective, the chapter focuses on the dynamics between the students themselves during some simple interactions where information processing preferences are used as the parameter that affects student’s overall positive experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aumann JR (1960) Acceptable points in games of perfect information. Pac J Math 10:381–417

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Aumann JR (2003) Game theory in the Talmud. Jewish law and economics research bulletin series. Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cools E, Van den Broeck H (2007) Development and validation of the cognitive style indicator. J Psychol 141(4):359–387. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.141.4.359-388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dixit A, Skeath S (1999) Games of strategy. W.W. Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fleming ND, Mills C (1992) Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy 11:137–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gintis H (2000) Game theory evolving: a problem-centred introduction to modelling strategic behaviour. Princeton University Press, Princeton, ISBN 0-691-00942-2

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamdan N, McKnight P, McKnight K, Arfstrom KM (2013) A review of flipped learning. Flipped Learning Network, George Mason University, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harsanyi JC (1967) Games with incomplete information played by Bayesian players. Behav Sci 14:159–182

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson G (2013) Student perceptions of the flipped classroom. Thesis for Master of Arts in Educational Technology, The University of British Columbia, The College of Graduate Studies

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koutsoupias E, Papadimitriou C (2009) Worst-case equilibria. Comput Sci Rev 3(2):65–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nash JF (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18(2):155–162

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of games and economic bahavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Reid R et al (2016) Asking students what they think, student user experience (UX) research studies to inform online course design. In: Proceeding of Association for the Advancement of Computing Education (AACE): e-Learn 2016

    Google Scholar 

  14. Riener C, Willingham D (2010) The myth of learning styles. Change 42(5):32–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rubinstein A (1982) Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 98(1):97–109

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Scheg A (2015) Implementation and critical assessment of the flipped classroom experience, A volume in the Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series. IGI Global, Hershey, 318 pages

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schelling TC (1960) The strategy of conflict. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Selten R (1975) Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games. Int J Game Theory 4:25–55

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Sohrabi B, Iraj H (2016) Implementing flipped classroom using digital media: a comparison of two demographically different group perceptions. Comput Hum Behav 60(2016):514–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yiatrou P et al (2016) The synthesis of a unified pedagogy for the design and evaluation of e-learning software for high-school computing. In: Ganzha M, Maciaszek L, Paprzycki M (eds) Proceedings of the 2016 federated conference on computer science and information systems, ACSIS, vol 8. Polskie Towarzystwo Informatyczne/IEEE, Warsaw/Los Alamitos, pp 927–931

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Antoniou, J. (2021). New Technological Learning Environments: Tensions Between Teaching and Learning in Groups and Consideration of Learning Styles to Improve Quality of Student Experience. In: Quality of Experience and Learning in Information Systems. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52559-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52559-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52558-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52559-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics