Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Psychology ((BRIEFSCOGNIT))

  • 177 Accesses

Abstract

Educators have long been concerned with the difficulties faced by students when it comes to applying their knowledge to contents and contexts different from those of the original learning (i.e., the “problem of inert knowledge”). However, only since the 1980s a number of psychological investigations started to unveil the causes of these transfer difficulties. Chapter 2 reviews the parallel results of two experimental traditions in the study of analogical retrieval: studies of analogical problem-solving and cued-recall experiments of story reminding. Both threads of studies document the pervasive role of surface similarities in analogical retrieval: source analogs (i.e., stored situations whose deep structure is isomorphic to the situation being currently processed) are seldom retrieved when their individual elements are not semantically similar to those of the target situation. The chapter goes on to illustrate how the observed centrality of surface-level similarities has inspired the dominant computer simulations to date, as well as to advance some conjectures about the adaptive advantage of retrieving “literally” similar episodes during the Pleistocene’s environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Needless to say, participants could have treated the experimenters’ intrusion quite differently from the sudden reminding that spontaneously pops up in their mind. While the former could legitimately be interpreted as an unrelated interruption, the latter may be interpreted as bearing some meaningful connection to the target episode being processed.

References

  • Anoli, L., Antonietti, A., Crisafulli, L., & Cantoia, M. (2001). Accessing source information in analogical problem-solving. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 237–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 612–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, S. B., & Goldstone, R. L. (2012). The import of knowledge export: Connecting findings and theories of transfer of learning. Educational Psychologist, 47, 153–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58, 270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbus, K., Gentner, D., & Law, K. (1995). MAC/FAC: A model of similarity-based retrieval. Cognitive Science, 19, 141–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D., Rattermann, M. J., & Forbus, K. D. (1993). The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 431–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104, 427–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane, M. T. (1987). On retrieving analogues when solving problems. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynal, L., Clement, E., & Sander, E. (2017). Challenging the superficial similarities superiority account for analogical retrieval. In G. Gunzelmann, A. Howes, T. Tenbrink, & E. Davelaar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 2957–2962). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, S. K., Ernst, G. W., & Banerji, R. (1974). The role of analogy in transfer between similar problem states. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 436–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripoll, T. (1998). Why this makes me think of that. Thinking and Reasoning, 4, 15–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, R. M., & Weisberg, R. W. (1986). Context-dependent effects on analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition, 14, 442–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P., Holyoak, K., Nelson, G., & Gochfeld, D. (1990). Analog retrieval by constraint satisfaction. Artificial Intelligence, 46, 259–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, C. M., Holyoak, K. J., & Lange, T. E. (1996). Remote analogical reminding. Memory & Cognition, 24, 629–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Trench, M., Minervino, R.A. (2020). The Experimental Tradition. In: Distant Connections: The Memory Basis of Creative Analogy. SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52545-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics