Skip to main content

Coherency: From Outlier Detection to Reducing Comparisons in the ANP Supermatrix

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM 2019)

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 618 Accesses

Abstract

The process of coming to a decision with the Analytic Network Process (ANP) and statistical approaches have many similarities. Testing the data is crucial in both frameworks to avoid either using a biased model or obtaining inaccurate predictions. Cross validation is one example of a step used in regression to give an accurate measure of a model’s predictive power. In the ANP there was no way to check the priority vectors in a Supermatrix for outliers or perform any cross validation. The Linking Coherency Index is a way to perform cross validation at the level of the weighted Supermatrix and, in other words, check for “Super-Consistency” to identify outliers among the priority vectors in the weighted Supermatrix. Testing for coherency and updating incoherent priority vectors is an important step to improving the accuracy of the decision model. After identifying incoherent priority vectors, decision makers can: return to the decision making process and update the incoherent priority vector or use a dynamic clustering algorithm to provide a suggested update using data from the linking estimates that were obtained when calculating the Linking Coherency Index. Coherent linking estimates can also be used to reduce the number of needed comparisons in an ANP model which would likely increase its application. Coherency testing is a worthwhile and crucial step in the ANP and should become the norm anytime a decision will be made using the framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chen K, Kou G, Tarn JM, Song Y (2015) Bridging the gap between missing and inconsistent values in eliciting preference from pairwise comparison matrices. Ann Oper Res, 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Qiuxia J, Hui F, Hui L, Jiarui H, Yanqi W, Jie C, Cheng W, Yuehua W (2019) Analytic network process: Academic insights and perspectives analysis. J Clean Prod 235(1):1276–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper O, Liu G (2017) Achieving the desired level of dependency in anp decision models. Int J Anal Hierarchy Process 9(1):2–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper O, Yavuz I (2016) Linking validation: A search for coherency within the supermatrix. Eur J Oper Res 252(1):232–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domingues R, Filippone M, Michiardi P, Zouaoui J (2018) A comparative evaluation of outlier detection algorithms: Experiments and analyses. Pattern Recognition 74:406–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harker PT (1987) Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical Modelling 9(11):837–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings A, Gross LJ (2012) Encyclopedia of theoretical ecology, vol 4. Univ of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho HF, Hung CC (2008) Marketing mix formulation for higher education: An integrated analysis employing analytic hierarchy process, cluster analysis and correspondence analysis. Int J Educ Manag 22(4):328–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge V, Austin J (2004) A survey of outlier detection methodologies. Artif Intell Rev 22(2):85–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain AK (2010) Data clustering: 50 years beyond k-means. Pattern Recogn Lett 31(8):651–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kou G, Lou C (2012) Multiple factor hierarchical clustering algorithm for large scale web page and search engine clickstream data. Ann Oper Res 197(1):123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kou G, Ergu D, Lin C, Chen Y (2016) Pairwise comparison matrix in multiple criteria decision making. Technol Econ Dev Econ 22(5):738–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwiesielewicz M, Van Uden E (2004) Inconsistent and contradictory judgements in pairwise comparison method in the ahp. Comput Oper Res 31(5):713–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Shi Y, Nazem SM (1996) Supporting rural telecommunications: A compromise solutions approach. Ann Oper Res 68(1):33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu BS, Shen YH, Chen XH, Chen Y, Wang XQ (2014) A partial binary tree dea-da cyclic classification model for decision makers in complex multi-attribute large-group interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making problems. Information Fusion 18:119–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu DR, Shih YY (2005) Integrating ahp and data mining for product recommendation based on customer lifetime value. Inf Manag 42(3):387–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Fan ZP, Zhang X (2016) A method for large group decision-making based on evaluation information provided by participators from multiple groups. Information Fusion 29:132–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popat SK, Emmanuel M (2014) Review and comparative study of clustering techniques. Int J Comput Sci Inf Technol 5(1):805–812

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15(3):234–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resources allocation. McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1994) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24(6):19–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2005) Theory and applications of the analytic network process: decision making with benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks. RWS publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoner B, Wedley WC, Choo EU (1993) A unified approach to ahp with linking pins. Eur J Oper Res 64(3):384–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas LG (1982) Reciprocal matrices with random coefficients. Mathematical Modelling 3(1):69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VIM I (2004) International vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology (vim). International Organization 2004:09–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedley W (2013) Ahp/anp before, present and beyond. ISAHP 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedley WC, Choo EU (2001) A unit interpretation of multi-criteria ratios. In: Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on the analytic hierarchy process, Berne, Switzerland, pp 561–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedley WC, Choo EU (2011) Multi-criteria ratios: What is the unit? J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 18(3-4):161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedley WC, Schoner B, Tang TS (1993) Starting rules for incomplete comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process. Math Comput Modell 17(4-5):93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yavuz I, Cooper O (2017) A dynamic clustering method to improve the coherency of an anp supermatrix. Ann Oper Res 254(1-2):507–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahir S (2007) A new approach to understanding and finding remedy for rank reversals in the additive analytic hierarchy process. ASAC 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HJ, Dong YC, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) Consensus building for the heterogeneous large-scale gdm with the individual concerns and satisfactions. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26:864–898

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orrin Cooper .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cooper, O., Yavuz, I. (2021). Coherency: From Outlier Detection to Reducing Comparisons in the ANP Supermatrix. In: Topcu, Y.I., Özaydın, Ö., Kabak, Ö., Önsel Ekici, Ş. (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Making. MCDM 2019. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52406-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics