Abstract
The process of coming to a decision with the Analytic Network Process (ANP) and statistical approaches have many similarities. Testing the data is crucial in both frameworks to avoid either using a biased model or obtaining inaccurate predictions. Cross validation is one example of a step used in regression to give an accurate measure of a model’s predictive power. In the ANP there was no way to check the priority vectors in a Supermatrix for outliers or perform any cross validation. The Linking Coherency Index is a way to perform cross validation at the level of the weighted Supermatrix and, in other words, check for “Super-Consistency” to identify outliers among the priority vectors in the weighted Supermatrix. Testing for coherency and updating incoherent priority vectors is an important step to improving the accuracy of the decision model. After identifying incoherent priority vectors, decision makers can: return to the decision making process and update the incoherent priority vector or use a dynamic clustering algorithm to provide a suggested update using data from the linking estimates that were obtained when calculating the Linking Coherency Index. Coherent linking estimates can also be used to reduce the number of needed comparisons in an ANP model which would likely increase its application. Coherency testing is a worthwhile and crucial step in the ANP and should become the norm anytime a decision will be made using the framework.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chen K, Kou G, Tarn JM, Song Y (2015) Bridging the gap between missing and inconsistent values in eliciting preference from pairwise comparison matrices. Ann Oper Res, 1–21
Chen Y, Qiuxia J, Hui F, Hui L, Jiarui H, Yanqi W, Jie C, Cheng W, Yuehua W (2019) Analytic network process: Academic insights and perspectives analysis. J Clean Prod 235(1):1276–1294
Cooper O, Liu G (2017) Achieving the desired level of dependency in anp decision models. Int J Anal Hierarchy Process 9(1):2–26
Cooper O, Yavuz I (2016) Linking validation: A search for coherency within the supermatrix. Eur J Oper Res 252(1):232–245
Domingues R, Filippone M, Michiardi P, Zouaoui J (2018) A comparative evaluation of outlier detection algorithms: Experiments and analyses. Pattern Recognition 74:406–421
Harker PT (1987) Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical Modelling 9(11):837–848
Hastings A, Gross LJ (2012) Encyclopedia of theoretical ecology, vol 4. Univ of California Press
Ho HF, Hung CC (2008) Marketing mix formulation for higher education: An integrated analysis employing analytic hierarchy process, cluster analysis and correspondence analysis. Int J Educ Manag 22(4):328–340
Hodge V, Austin J (2004) A survey of outlier detection methodologies. Artif Intell Rev 22(2):85–126
Jain AK (2010) Data clustering: 50 years beyond k-means. Pattern Recogn Lett 31(8):651–666
Kou G, Lou C (2012) Multiple factor hierarchical clustering algorithm for large scale web page and search engine clickstream data. Ann Oper Res 197(1):123–134
Kou G, Ergu D, Lin C, Chen Y (2016) Pairwise comparison matrix in multiple criteria decision making. Technol Econ Dev Econ 22(5):738–765
Kwiesielewicz M, Van Uden E (2004) Inconsistent and contradictory judgements in pairwise comparison method in the ahp. Comput Oper Res 31(5):713–719
Lee H, Shi Y, Nazem SM (1996) Supporting rural telecommunications: A compromise solutions approach. Ann Oper Res 68(1):33–45
Liu BS, Shen YH, Chen XH, Chen Y, Wang XQ (2014) A partial binary tree dea-da cyclic classification model for decision makers in complex multi-attribute large-group interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making problems. Information Fusion 18:119–130
Liu DR, Shih YY (2005) Integrating ahp and data mining for product recommendation based on customer lifetime value. Inf Manag 42(3):387–400
Liu Y, Fan ZP, Zhang X (2016) A method for large group decision-making based on evaluation information provided by participators from multiple groups. Information Fusion 29:132–141
Popat SK, Emmanuel M (2014) Review and comparative study of clustering techniques. Int J Comput Sci Inf Technol 5(1):805–812
Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15(3):234–281
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resources allocation. McGraw-Hill
Saaty TL (1994) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24(6):19–43
Saaty TL (2005) Theory and applications of the analytic network process: decision making with benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks. RWS publications
Schoner B, Wedley WC, Choo EU (1993) A unified approach to ahp with linking pins. Eur J Oper Res 64(3):384–392
Vargas LG (1982) Reciprocal matrices with random coefficients. Mathematical Modelling 3(1):69–81
VIM I (2004) International vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology (vim). International Organization 2004:09–14
Wedley W (2013) Ahp/anp before, present and beyond. ISAHP 2013
Wedley WC, Choo EU (2001) A unit interpretation of multi-criteria ratios. In: Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on the analytic hierarchy process, Berne, Switzerland, pp 561–569
Wedley WC, Choo EU (2011) Multi-criteria ratios: What is the unit? J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 18(3-4):161–171
Wedley WC, Schoner B, Tang TS (1993) Starting rules for incomplete comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process. Math Comput Modell 17(4-5):93–100
Yavuz I, Cooper O (2017) A dynamic clustering method to improve the coherency of an anp supermatrix. Ann Oper Res 254(1-2):507–531
Zahir S (2007) A new approach to understanding and finding remedy for rank reversals in the additive analytic hierarchy process. ASAC 2007
Zhang HJ, Dong YC, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) Consensus building for the heterogeneous large-scale gdm with the individual concerns and satisfactions. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26:864–898
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cooper, O., Yavuz, I. (2021). Coherency: From Outlier Detection to Reducing Comparisons in the ANP Supermatrix. In: Topcu, Y.I., Özaydın, Ö., Kabak, Ö., Önsel Ekici, Ş. (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Making. MCDM 2019. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52406-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52406-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52405-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52406-7
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)