Abstract
Few things seem so opposite to each other as the highly innovative blockchain technology and the ancient land registration sector, in which one traditionally feels thrown back into the pre-digital era. However, for some believers this unlikely pair might be on its way to form one of the world’s new power couples. This contribution aims at analyzing blockchain technology in land registration matters from a material legal point of view. First, some blockchain land registration initiatives are discussed. Second, the possibilities of blockchain technology for land registration are evaluated on the basis of two variables: the lacunar or complete nature of a land register and its negative or positive nature. In doing so, Belgian, French and German law will be taken into account, offering a thorough civil law perspective on the matter.
This paper is the abbreviated and updated version of an earlier paper on this topic: Verheye (2017, pp. 441–477). See also in Dutch on related topics: Verheye, Verslype, and Danneels (2018, 109 p); Verheye (2018, pp. 212–238). See also, for instance, the special issue of the European Property Law Journal on this topic that appeared in 2017.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Decree of 30 October 1935 modifying the publicity regime.
- 2.
Decree nr. 55-22 of 4 Januari 1995 holding the reform of the immovable publicity, Journal Officiel de la République Française 7-1-1955.
References
Algiu, A.-C. (1912). Etude sur la règle Error communis facit jius. Parijs: Marchal & Godde.
Barbieri, M., & Gassen, D. (2017). Blockchain—Can this new technology really revolutionize the land registry systems. In World Bank (Ed.), Responsible Land Governance: Towards an Evidence Based Approach. Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty (Vol. 1). Washington: World Bank.
Bauer, H.-J., & von Oefele, F. (2013). Grundbuchordnung. Kommentar. MĂĽnchen: Verlag Franz Vahlen.
Boudot, M. (2003). Apparence. In RĂ©p.civ. Dalloz. Parijs: Dalloz.
Byttebier, K. (2005). Voorrechten en hypotheken. Antwerpen: Maklu.
Danis-Fatôme, A. (2004). Apparence et contrat, Bibliothèque de droit privé. Parijs: L.G.D.J.
De Page, H. (1957a). Traité élémentaire de droit civil belge, V. Brussel: Bruylant.
De Page, H. (1957b). Traité élémentaire de droit civil belge, VII. Brussel: Bruylant.
Fehrenbacher, O. (2004). Registerpublizität und Haftung im Zivilrecht, Deutsches, Europäisches und Vergleichendes Wirtschaftsrecht. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
Grziwotz, H., Keukenschrijver, A., & Ring, G. (2016). NomosKommentar BGB. III. Sachenrecht. Baden-Baden: DeutscherAnwaltVerein.
Hager, J. (1990). Verkehrsschutz durch redlichen Erwerb. München: C.H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
Jacobs, H., Michiels, D., & Van der Meersch, B. (1997). Nieuwe bevoegdheden voor de notaris? In Dossier associatie van notarissen. Bijzonder nummer T.Not., 5. Brugge: Die Keure.
Lemieux, V. L. (2017). Evaluating the use of blockchain in land transactions: An archival science perspective. EPLJ, 392–440.
Loniewski, A. (1905). Essai sur le rĂ´le actuel de la maxime Error communis facit Jus. Aix: J. Nicot.
Lutter, M. (1964). Die Grenzen des sogenannten Gutglaubensschutzes im Grundbuch. AcP, 122–182.
Medicus, D. (2001). Besitz, Grundbuch und Erbschein als Rechtsscheinträger. Jura, 294–299.
Milliet, G. (1901). Des effets de la propriété apparente en droit civil. Parijs: Librairie de jurisprudence ancienne et moderne Edouard Duchemin.
Nogueroles PeirĂł, N., & Martinez GarcĂa, E. J. (2017). Blockchain and land registration systems. EPLJ, 296–320.
Rabagny, A. (2001). Théorie générale de l’apparence en droit privé, t. II. Parijs: Atelier national de reproduction des thèses.
Sagaert, V. (2014). Goederenrecht, Beginselen van Belgisch Privaatrecht. Mechelen: Kluwer.
Storme, M. E. (1997–1998). Het grondboek: de vereiste hervorming van de regels betreffende de verkrijging van onroerende zakelijke rechten. RW, 1173–1187.
Stranart, A.-C., & Alter, C. (2002). Quel est le sort de l’hypothèque consentie par un acquéreur dont le droit est ultérieurement annulé? In Liber amicorum Lucien Simont (p. 493). Brussel: Bruylant.
Thomas, R. (2017). Blockchain’s incompatibility for use as a land registry: Issues of definition, feasibility and risk. EPLJ, 361–391.
Verheye, B. (2017). Real estate publicity in a blockchain world: A critical assessment. EPLJ, 441–477.
Verheye, B. (2018). Blockchaintechnologie en het notariaat bij vastgoedtransacties: Damocles’ zwaard of opportuniteit? T.Not., 212–238.
Verheye, B., Verslype, K., & Danneels, P. (2018). Blockchain en smart contracts. Impact op de notaris als vertrouwde tussenpersoon? Brussel: Larcier.
von Staudinger, J., Gursky, K.-H., Gutzeit, M., Kutter, H.-D., & Seiler, H. H. (2012). Kommentar zum BGB. III. Sachenrecht—Einleitung zum Sachenrecht; §§ 854–882 (Allgemeines Liegenschaftsrecht 1). Berlijn: Sellier—de Gruyter.
Vos, J. (2016). Blockchain-based land registry: Panacea, illusion or something in between? Retrieved from https://www.elra.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/10.-Jacques-Vos-Blockchain-based-Land-Registry.pdf:1-26
Vouin, R. (1939). La bonne foi. Notion et rôleactuels en droit privé français. Parijs: Librairie Générale de Droit & de Jurisprudence.
Westermann, H. (1963). Die Grundlagen des Gutglaubensschutzes. JuS, 1–8.
Westermann, H., Westermann, H. P., Gursky, K.-H., & Eickmann, D. (2011). Sachenrecht. Heidelberg: C.F. MĂĽller.
Wiegand, W. (1975). Der öffentliche Glaube des Grundbuchs. JuS, 205–214.
Wiegand, W. (1978). Rechtsableiting vom Nichtberechtigten. Rechtsschein und Vertrauensschutz bei Verfügungsgeschäften. JuS, 145–150.
Wieling, H. J. (1992). Sachenrecht. Berlijn: Springer.
Wilhelm, J. (2016). Sachenrecht. Berlijn: De Gruyter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Verheye, B. (2020). Land Registration in the Twenty-First Century: Blockchain Land Registers from a Civil Law Perspective. In: Lehavi, A., Levine-Schnur, R. (eds) Disruptive Technology, Legal Innovation, and the Future of Real Estate. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52387-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52387-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52386-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52387-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)