Skip to main content

Land Registration in the Twenty-First Century: Blockchain Land Registers from a Civil Law Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disruptive Technology, Legal Innovation, and the Future of Real Estate

Abstract

Few things seem so opposite to each other as the highly innovative blockchain technology and the ancient land registration sector, in which one traditionally feels thrown back into the pre-digital era. However, for some believers this unlikely pair might be on its way to form one of the world’s new power couples. This contribution aims at analyzing blockchain technology in land registration matters from a material legal point of view. First, some blockchain land registration initiatives are discussed. Second, the possibilities of blockchain technology for land registration are evaluated on the basis of two variables: the lacunar or complete nature of a land register and its negative or positive nature. In doing so, Belgian, French and German law will be taken into account, offering a thorough civil law perspective on the matter.

This paper is the abbreviated and updated version of an earlier paper on this topic: Verheye (2017, pp. 441–477). See also in Dutch on related topics: Verheye, Verslype, and Danneels (2018, 109 p); Verheye (2018, pp. 212–238). See also, for instance, the special issue of the European Property Law Journal on this topic that appeared in 2017.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Decree of 30 October 1935 modifying the publicity regime.

  2. 2.

    Decree nr. 55-22 of 4 Januari 1995 holding the reform of the immovable publicity, Journal Officiel de la République Française 7-1-1955.

References

  • Algiu, A.-C. (1912). Etude sur la règle Error communis facit jius. Parijs: Marchal & Godde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, M., & Gassen, D. (2017). Blockchain—Can this new technology really revolutionize the land registry systems. In World Bank (Ed.), Responsible Land Governance: Towards an Evidence Based Approach. Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty (Vol. 1). Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, H.-J., & von Oefele, F. (2013). Grundbuchordnung. Kommentar. MĂĽnchen: Verlag Franz Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudot, M. (2003). Apparence. In RĂ©p.civ. Dalloz. Parijs: Dalloz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byttebier, K. (2005). Voorrechten en hypotheken. Antwerpen: Maklu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danis-FatĂ´me, A. (2004). Apparence et contrat, Bibliothèque de droit privĂ©. Parijs: L.G.D.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Page, H. (1957a). TraitĂ© Ă©lĂ©mentaire de droit civil belge, V. Brussel: Bruylant.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Page, H. (1957b). TraitĂ© Ă©lĂ©mentaire de droit civil belge, VII. Brussel: Bruylant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehrenbacher, O. (2004). Registerpublizität und Haftung im Zivilrecht, Deutsches, Europäisches und Vergleichendes Wirtschaftsrecht. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grziwotz, H., Keukenschrijver, A., & Ring, G. (2016). NomosKommentar BGB. III. Sachenrecht. Baden-Baden: DeutscherAnwaltVerein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hager, J. (1990). Verkehrsschutz durch redlichen Erwerb. MĂĽnchen: C.H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, H., Michiels, D., & Van der Meersch, B. (1997). Nieuwe bevoegdheden voor de notaris? In Dossier associatie van notarissen. Bijzonder nummer T.Not., 5. Brugge: Die Keure.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemieux, V. L. (2017). Evaluating the use of blockchain in land transactions: An archival science perspective. EPLJ, 392–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loniewski, A. (1905). Essai sur le rĂ´le actuel de la maxime Error communis facit Jus. Aix: J. Nicot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutter, M. (1964). Die Grenzen des sogenannten Gutglaubensschutzes im Grundbuch. AcP, 122–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medicus, D. (2001). Besitz, Grundbuch und Erbschein als Rechtsscheinträger. Jura, 294–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliet, G. (1901). Des effets de la propriĂ©tĂ© apparente en droit civil. Parijs: Librairie de jurisprudence ancienne et moderne Edouard Duchemin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nogueroles PeirĂł, N., & Martinez GarcĂ­a, E. J. (2017). Blockchain and land registration systems. EPLJ, 296–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabagny, A. (2001). ThĂ©orie gĂ©nĂ©rale de l’apparence en droit privĂ©, t. II. Parijs: Atelier national de reproduction des thèses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagaert, V. (2014). Goederenrecht, Beginselen van Belgisch Privaatrecht. Mechelen: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storme, M. E. (1997–1998). Het grondboek: de vereiste hervorming van de regels betreffende de verkrijging van onroerende zakelijke rechten. RW, 1173–1187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stranart, A.-C., & Alter, C. (2002). Quel est le sort de l’hypothèque consentie par un acquĂ©reur dont le droit est ultĂ©rieurement annulĂ©? In Liber amicorum Lucien Simont (p. 493). Brussel: Bruylant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. (2017). Blockchain’s incompatibility for use as a land registry: Issues of definition, feasibility and risk. EPLJ, 361–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheye, B. (2017). Real estate publicity in a blockchain world: A critical assessment. EPLJ, 441–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheye, B. (2018). Blockchaintechnologie en het notariaat bij vastgoedtransacties: Damocles’ zwaard of opportuniteit? T.Not., 212–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheye, B., Verslype, K., & Danneels, P. (2018). Blockchain en smart contracts. Impact op de notaris als vertrouwde tussenpersoon? Brussel: Larcier.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Staudinger, J., Gursky, K.-H., Gutzeit, M., Kutter, H.-D., & Seiler, H. H. (2012). Kommentar zum BGB. III. Sachenrecht—Einleitung zum Sachenrecht; §§ 854–882 (Allgemeines Liegenschaftsrecht 1). Berlijn: Sellier—de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos, J. (2016). Blockchain-based land registry: Panacea, illusion or something in between? Retrieved from https://www.elra.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/10.-Jacques-Vos-Blockchain-based-Land-Registry.pdf:1-26

  • Vouin, R. (1939). La bonne foi. Notion et rĂ´leactuels en droit privĂ© français. Parijs: Librairie GĂ©nĂ©rale de Droit & de Jurisprudence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westermann, H. (1963). Die Grundlagen des Gutglaubensschutzes. JuS, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westermann, H., Westermann, H. P., Gursky, K.-H., & Eickmann, D. (2011). Sachenrecht. Heidelberg: C.F. MĂĽller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegand, W. (1975). Der öffentliche Glaube des Grundbuchs. JuS, 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegand, W. (1978). Rechtsableiting vom Nichtberechtigten. Rechtsschein und Vertrauensschutz bei VerfĂĽgungsgeschäften. JuS, 145–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieling, H. J. (1992). Sachenrecht. Berlijn: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, J. (2016). Sachenrecht. Berlijn: De Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Verheye .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Verheye, B. (2020). Land Registration in the Twenty-First Century: Blockchain Land Registers from a Civil Law Perspective. In: Lehavi, A., Levine-Schnur, R. (eds) Disruptive Technology, Legal Innovation, and the Future of Real Estate. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52387-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics