Abstract
Both land registration and blockchains pursue the production of immutable information. Land registration is hence among the most often suggested use cases of the blockchain technology. However, only a very small number of successful large-scale applications exist in the wild. This chapter aims at explaining why this number is so low despite blockchain’s prima facie suitability for land registration. After laying technical and legal foundations, we argue that trading shares of real estate investment funds on a blockchain has little to do with land registration. This allows us to concentrate on the benefits that the blockchain technology may provide for land registration in a proper sense. We show that “anchoring” land registers in public blockchains by regularly writing hash values of their content in one or several of those blockchains can overcome lack of trust in the immutability of digitized land registers without affecting the latter’s rules and organization. In contrast, implementing the entire land registration system on a blockchain and change rules and governance accordingly may result in high efficiency and effectiveness. This may be a big leap forward for many jurisdictions. In jurisdictions with already well-functioning land registration systems, the gain from a transition to the blockchain technology tends to be small for both deeds recordation and title registration systems, in fact often too small to justify the costs of transition. The major reason is that many inevitable links between real-estate reality to its blockchain representation require human decisions to balance the diverging interests of affected parties.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
In some jurisdictions Bitcoins as virtual commodities cannot be owned as property nor can they be object of any other legal right.
- 2.
With five competing blockchains, the smallest one would use less than 20% of the computing power. Redirecting computing power from other blockchains would make a 51-percent attack relatively easy.
- 3.
Outside the area of land registration, proof of authority underlies several major blockchain projects, such as the academic blockchain-based repository “bloxberg” or facebook’s “libra” currency.
- 4.
The same is true for tokens that are assigned to a blockchain address for which the owner lost his private key. To keep these tokens and the assets the ownership of which they represent tradable, the land registration authority must be able to transfer them to an address that the legal owner controls.
References
Arruñada, B. (2003). Property enforcement as organized consent. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 19, 401–444.
Arruñada, B. (2017a). Property as sequential exchange: The forgotten limits of private contract. Journal of Institutional Economics, 13, 753–783.
Arruñada, B. (2017b). How should we model property? Thinking with my critics. Journal of Institutional Economics, 13, 815–827.
Arruñada, B. (2018). Blockchain’s struggle to deliver impersonal exchange. Minnesota Journal of Law Science & Technology, 19, 55–105.
Baird, D., & Jackson, T. (1984). Information, uncertainty, and the transfer of property. The Journal of Legal Studies, 13, 299–320.
Barbieri, M., & Gassen, D. (2017, March 20–24). Blockchain—Can this new technology really revolutionize the land registry system? Paper prepared for presentation at the “2017 World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty”. Washington DC: The World Bank. Retrieved from https://www.notariato.it/sites/default/files/Land_Poverty_Conference_Blockchain.pdf, last visited April 1st, 2020.
Benbunan-Fich, R., & Castellanos, A. (2018). Digitalization of land records: From paper to blockchain. In 39th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2018) San Francisco, California, USA 13–16 December 2018 (Vol. 2, pp. 1024–1032).
Biais, B., Bisière, C., Bouvard, M., & Casamatta, C. (2019). The blockchain folk theorem. The Review of Financial Studies, 32, 1662–1715.
Chen, L., Cong, L., & Xiao, Y. (2019). A brief introduction to blockchain economics (August 10, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3442691
ChromaWay. (2019). Chromia Platform Whitepaper, Version 0.11. Retrieved from https://chromia.com/whitepaper-english.html, last visited April 1st, 2020.
Garay, J. A., Kiayias, A., & Leonardos, N. (2015). The Bitcoin backbone protocol: Analysis and applications. In E. Oswald & M. Fischlin (Eds.), Advances in cryptology, EUROCRYPT 2015, Lecture notes in computer science 9057 (pp. 281–310). Berlin: Springer.
Graglia, J. M., & Mellon, C. (2018). Blockchain and property in 2018—At the end of the beginning. Innovations, 12, 90–116.
Hamilton, D. (2019, January 11). Blockchain land registry: The new kid on the block. CoinCentral. https://coincentral.com/blockchain-land-registry/, last visited April 1st, 2020.
Kaczorowska, M. (2019). Blockchain-based land registration: Possibilities and challenges. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, 13, 339–360.
Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest, and money. London: Macmillan.
LandLayBy. (2018). Land Layby Listing (LLL) Platform, Harambee Token [Hrbe], White Paper. Retrieved from https://hrbe.io/images/WHITEPAPER_HRBE06022.pdf, last visited April 1st, 2020.
Lantmäteriet. (2020). Handläggningstid för inskrivningsärenden. Retrieved from https://www.lantmateriet.se/en/real-property/change-owner/Handlaggningstid-for-Inskrivningsarenden/, last visited April 1st, 2020.
Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin. A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Retrieved from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
Shang, Q., & Price, A. (2018). A blockchain-based land titling project in the Republic of Georgia. Innovations, 12, 72–78.
Snäll, M., Suomalainen, D., & Kempe, M. (2018). Fastighetsköp och lagfart genom en blockkedja—governance och juridik. Report of Kairos Future and the Swedish land registration authority (Lantmäteriet). Retrieved from https://www.lantmateriet.se/contentassets/8d2b5d7647634c02a329b01e46e61071/publikation-swe-fastighetskop-och-lagfart-genom-en-blockkedja%2D%2Dgovernance-och-juridik-2018.pdf
Spielman, A. (2016). Blockchain: digitally rebuilding the real estate industry. MS dissertation Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved from https://dci.mit.edu/s/spielman_thesis.pdf, last visited on April 1st, 2020.
Zevenbergen, J. (2002). Systems of land registration–Aspects and effects (PhD Thesis, Technical University Delft). Delft: Netherlands Geodetic Commission.
Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H.-N., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2018). Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey. International Journal of Web and Grid Services, 14, 2018.
Acknowledgements
Thanks for helpful comments go to the participants of the Conference on Disruptive Technology, Legal Innovation and the Future of Real Estate at IDC Herzliya and of the Law and Economics Research Seminars at the Universities of Kassel and of Vienna. All remaining errors are mine, of course. This work received support by a generous grant of Metamorphoses GmbH, Baunatal.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
von Wangenheim, G. (2020). Blockchain-Based Land Registers: A Law-and-Economics Perspective. In: Lehavi, A., Levine-Schnur, R. (eds) Disruptive Technology, Legal Innovation, and the Future of Real Estate. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52387-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52387-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52386-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52387-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)