Smart digital infrastructures predicated on myriads of sensors distributed in the environment are often rendered as key to contemporary urban security governance to detect risky or suspicious entities before or during a criminal event takes place. At the same time, they often involve surveillance of urban environments, and thus not only criminals but also large groups of people and entities unrelated to criminal phenomena can end up under close inspection.
This chapter makes its contribution on two levels. For one, it offers a theoretical framework to the research and conceptualization of the role of sensing infrastructures in urban security practices. It shows how insights from Philosophy of Technology and Science and Technology Studies can produce a nuanced understanding of the role of digital technologies in security practices, beyond standard conceptualizations of technology. Moreover, the chapter proposes a geological approach to enrich our repertoire of imagining and researching smart urban ecosystems.
Secondly, the chapter contributes to a higher level of transparency of these practices by presenting the results of ethnographic research performed in a set of police organizations that employ sensing infrastructures and algorithmic profiling in their practices. The chapter draws empirically on research performed in the Dutch police, both at municipal and national levels with some additional material gathered in a constabulary in England. In these organizations, resource allocation decisions are often predicated on automated number plate recognition technology that processes data from an array of smart cameras distributed in the environment. In these ways together, the chapter highlights a set of normative issues with implications for the effectiveness and legitimacy of urban security (surveillance) practices in smart environments.
- Philosophy of technology
- Urban ecosystems
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
To protect the confidentiality of the individual police officers the name of the organizations are anonymized in this study and the names of individual officers were made generic.
Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Akrich, M., & Latour, B. (1992). A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and nonhuman assemblies. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 259–264). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bijker, W. (1992). The social construction of fluorescent lighting, or how an artifact was invented in its diffusion stage. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 75–104). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bijker, W. (2010). How is technology made?—That is the question! Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 63–76.
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brey, P. (1998). Artifacts as social agents. In H. Harbers (Ed.), Inside the politics of technology. Agency and normativity in the coproduction of technology and society (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Byrne, J., & Marx, G. T. (2011). Technological innovations in crime prevention and policing. A review of the research on implementation and impact. In E. D. Pauw, P. Ponsaers, K. Van der Vijver, W. Bruggeman, & P. Deelman (Eds.), Technology-led policing (Vol. 2011/3, 20, pp. 17–40). Antwerpen: Maklu.
Callon, M. (1987). Society in the making: The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. J. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems (pp. 83–103). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chan, J. B. L. (2001). The technology game: How information technology is transforming police practice. Journal of Criminal Justice, 1(2), 139–159.
Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The ‘Anthropocene’. Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17–18.
De Laat, P. (2018). Algorithmic decision-making based on machine learning from big data: Can transparency restore accountability? Philosophy & Technology, 31(4), 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0293-z.
Ericson, R., & Haggerty, K. D. (1997). Policing the risk society. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Foucault, M. (1976). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. London: Tavistock.
Gerson, E., & Star, S. L. (1986). Analyzing due process in the workplace. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 4(3, Special issue: selected papers from the conference on office information systems), 257–270.
Haggerty, K. D., & Ericson, R. (2000). The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology, 51(4), 17.
Harris, C. J. (2007). Police and soft technology: How information technology contributes to police decision making. In J. Byrne & D. Rebovich (Eds.), The new technology of crime, law and social control (pp. 153–183). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Hellemons, A., Beek, P. V. D., Malenstein, J., Goor, A. A. T., Kuijten, C., & Schewe, W. (2013). Final report on DEPET (Dissemination all over Europe of know-how of Privacy Enhancing Technologies). Prevention of and fight against crime 2010. Brussels: European Commission. Directorate–General HOME. Directorate F – Security.
Hess, K. M., & Orthmann, C. H. (2010). Criminal investigation (9th ed.). Scarborough: Delmar Cenage Learning.
Hildebrandt, M. (2011). Legal protection by design: Objections and refutations. Legisprudence, 2(5), 223–248.
Hildebrandt, M., & Gurtwith, S. (Eds.). (2008). Profiling the European citizen. Berlin: Springer.
Hildebrandt, M., & Koops, B.-J. (2010). The challenges of ambient law and legal protection in the profiling era. Modern Law Review, 73, 428–460.
Hoogewoning, F. C. (Ed.). (2006). The police in evolution - vision on policing. The Hague: Project Group Vision on Policing. Dutch Police Institute.
Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Innes, M., & Roberts, C. (2008). Reassurance policing, community intelligence and the co-production of neighbourhood order. In T. Williamson (Ed.), Handbook of knowledge based policing (pp. 241–262). West Sussex: Wiley.
Kamiran, F., Karim, A., Verwer, S., & Goudriaan, H. (2012). Classifying socially sensitive data without discrimination: An analysis of a crime suspect dataset. In Data mining workshops (ICDMW), IEEE 12th international conference, Brussels, 10–10 Dec. 2012 (pp. 370–377). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDMW.2012.117.
Kitchin, R. (2014). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1–14.
Kitchin, R. (2017). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087.
Koops, B.-J., & Leenes, R. (2014). Privacy regulation cannot be hardcoded. A critical comment on the ‘privacy by design’ provision in data-protection law. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 28(2), 159–171.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1988). Mixing humans and nonhumans together: The sociology of a door-closer. Social Problems, 35(3 Special Issue: The Sociology of Science and Technology), 298–310.
Latour, B. (1991). Technology is society made durable. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 103–131). London: Routledge.
Latour, B. (1994). On technological mediation: Philosophy, sociology, genealogy. Common knowledge, 3(2), 29–64.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Law, J. (1987). Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of Portuguese expansion. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems (pp. 111–134). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Law, J. (2008). Actor-network theory and material semiotics. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The new blackwell companion to social theory (3rd ed., pp. 141–158). Oxford: Blackwell.
Law, J. (2009). Seing like a survey. Cultural Sociology, 3(2), 239–256.
Law, J., & Mol, A. (2001). Situating technoscience: An inquiry into spatialities. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19(5), 609–621.
Leipnik, M. R., & Albert, D. P. (Eds.). (2003). GIS and law enforcement: Implementation issues and case studies. London: Taylor & Francis.
Leman-Langlois, S. (2012). Technocrime, policing, and surveillance (Vol. 3). New York: Routledge.
Lyon, D. (Ed.). (2003). Surveillance as social sorting (privacy, risk and digital discrimination). New York: Routledge.
MacKenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (1985). The social shaping of technology: How the refrigerator got its hum. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
Maguire, M. (2000). Policing by risks and targets: Some dimensions and implications of intelligence-led crime control. Policing and Society, 9(4), 315–336.
Mancuhan, K., & Clifton, C. (2014). Combating discrimination using Bayesian networks. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 22(2), 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-014-9156-4.
Manning, P. (2008). The technology of policing: Crime mapping, information technology, and the rationality of crime control. New York and London: New York University Press.
Meijer, A., & Thaens, M. (2018a). Quantified street: Smart governance of urban safety. Information Polity, 23(1), 29–41.
Meijer, A., & Thaens, M. (2018b). Urban technological innovation: Developing and testing a sociotechnical framework for studying smart city projects. Urban Affairs Review, 54(2), 363–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087416670274.
Mol, A. (2010). Actor-network theory: Sensitive terms and enduring tensions. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 50(1), 253–269.
Neyroud, P. (2008). Policing and ethics. In T. Newburn (Ed.), The handbook of policing. Cullompton: Willan publishing.
Niculescu-Dincă, V. (2018). Towards a sedimentology of information infrastructures: A geological approach for understanding the city. Philosophy & Technology, 31(3), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0298-7.
Norris, C., & Armstrong, G. (1999). The maximum surveillance society. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
Parker, J. R., & Federl, P. (1996). An approach to Licence plate recognition. Computer Science Technical Reports, University of Calgary, Alberta Canada, 591(11), 1–6.
Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. (1987). The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ratcliffe, J. H. (2008). Intelligence-led policing. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
Rosenberger, R., & Verbeek, P.-P. (Eds.). (2015). Postphenomenological investigations: Essays on human–technology relations (postphenomenology and the philosophy of technology). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Sanders, C. (2006). Have you been identified? Hidden boundary work in emergency services classifications. Information, Communication & Society, 9(6), 714–736.
Schakel, J.-K., Rienks, R., & Ruissen, R. (2013). Knowledge-based policing: Augmenting reality with respect for privacy discrimination and privacy in the information society. In B. Custers, T. Calders, B. Schermer, & T. Zarsky (Eds.), Discrimination and privacy in the information society. Data mining and profiling in large databases (Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics) (Vol. 3, pp. 171–189). Heidelberg: Springer.
Sclove, R. (1995). Democracy and technology. New York: Guilford Press.
Tilley, N. (2008). Modern approaches to policing: Community, problem-oriented and intelligence-led. In T. Newburn (Ed.), Handbook of policing (pp. 373–403). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
Townsend, A. M. (2013). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. New York: W. W. Norton.
Tromp, N., Hekkert, P., & Verbeek, P.-P. (2011). Design for socially responsible behavior: A classification of influence based on intended user experience. Design Issues, 27(3), 3–19.
Van Ooijen, C., & Nouwt, S. (2009). Power and privacy: The use of LBS in Dutch public administration. In B. V. Loenen, J. W. J. Besemer, & J. A. Zevenbergen (Eds.), SDI convergence. Research, emerging trends, and critical assessment. Delft: NCG.
Verbeek, P.-P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
Verbeek, P.-P. (2006). Materializing morality. Design ethics and technological mediation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 31(3), 361–380.
Verbeek, P.-P. (2008). Obstetric ultrasound and the technological mediation of morality: A postphenomenological analysis. Human Studies, 31, 11–26.
Verbeek, P.-P. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Verbeek, P.-P. (2015). COVER STORY beyond interaction: A short introduction to mediation theory. Interactions, 22(3), 26–31.
Whelan, C., & Dupont, B. (2017). Taking stock of networks across the security field: A review, typology and research agenda. Policing and Society, 27(6), 671–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2017.1356297.
Williams, V. S., & Williams, B. O. (2008). Technology applications: Tools for law enforcement. In J. Ruiz & D. Hummer (Eds.), Handbook of police administration (Public administration and public policy) (pp. 165–173). New York: CRC Press.
Wittkower, D. E. (2017). Technology and discrimination. In J. C. Pitt & A. Shew (Eds.), Spaces for the future: A companion to philosophy of technology. New York: Routledge.
The author wants to thank Tsjalling Swierstra, Irma van der Ploeg, and Jason Pridmore as well as the police staff, municipality officials and technology developers for their generous collaboration and support for this research.
Editors and Affiliations
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Niculescu-Dincă, V. (2021). Theorizing Technologically Mediated Policing in Smart Cities: An Ethnographic Approach to Sensing Infrastructures in Security Practices. In: Nagenborg, M., Stone, T., González Woge, M., Vermaas, P.E. (eds) Technology and the City. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 36. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52313-8_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52312-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52313-8