Skip to main content

Business Process Model Driven Approach for Automatic Use Case Model Generation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Modeling and Software Design (BMSD 2020)

Abstract

Requirement elicitation is an essential step for establishing software requirements. They define the outcomes upon which software functionality is produced. However, several studies have shown majority of errors found in software functionality are directly linked to requirement elicitation. To address, this paper proposes a structured approach to derive system requirements automatically using business process models. It employs a systematic mechanism to improve business process models and transformation method to generate requirement models. It employs 26 defined heuristics rules that maps and controls transformation. The proposed approach is evaluated using seven case studies. Results show the viability to generate software requirements from business process models, and the automatic generation of rich UML-based use case diagram. The proposed approach achieves more precise and valid requirement specifications and was able to generate additional valid use case model features compared to other competing approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dijkman, R.M., Joosten, S., Ordina, F.: An algorithm to derive use case diagrams from business process models. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications, SEA, Anaheim, US‏ (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Odeh, M., Richard, K.: Bridging the gap between business models and system models. Inf. Softw. Technol. 45(15), 1053–1060 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aburub, F.: Activity-based approach to derive system models from business process models. In: International Conference on Information Society, i-Society. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Przybylek, A.: A business-oriented approach to requirements elicitation. In: International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering, ENASE. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boehm, B.W.: Software Engineering Economics, vol. 197. Prentice-hall, Englewood Cliffs (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Weerakkody, V., Currie, W.: Integrating business process reengineering with information systems development: issues & implications. In: van der Aalst, Wil M.P., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2678, pp. 302–320. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44895-0_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Hammer, M.: Reengineering work: don’t automate, obliterate. Harvard Bus. Rev. 68(4), 104–112 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kaplan, R.B., Murdock, L.: Rethinking the corporation: core process redesign. Mckinsey Q. 22, 27–44 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eriksson, E., Magnus, P.: Business modeling with UML. Wiley, New York (2000). Business Patterns at Work

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dijkman, R., Jorg, H., Jana, K., (eds) Business Process Model and Notation. Springer, Boston (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_1195

  11. Pressman, R.S.: Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. OMG: Unified modeling language (OMG UML), version 2.5, Technical report, Object Management Group (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bloch, M., Sven. B., Jürgen, L.: Delivering large-scale IT projects on time, on budget, and on value, McKinsey Quarterly (2012)‏

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cruz, E.F., Machado, R.J., Santos, M.Y.: From business process models to use case models: a systematic approach. In: Aveiro, D., Tribolet, J., Gouveia, D. (eds.) EEWC 2014. LNBIP, vol. 174, pp. 167–181. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06505-2_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Indulska, M., Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Business process modeling: current issues and future challenges. In: van Eck, P., Gordijn, J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) CAiSE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5565, pp. 501–514. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02144-2_39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Rajagopal, P., Lee, R., Ahlswede, T., Chiang, C.C., Karolak, D.: A new approach for software requirements elicitation. In: 6th International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing and ACIS International Workshop on Self-Assembling Wireless Network, pp. 32–42. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brooks, F.P.: No silver bullet: essence and accidents of software engineering. IEEE Comput. 20, 10–19 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Eriksson, H.-E., Penker, M.: Business Modeling with UML: Business Patterns at Work. Wiley, Hoboken (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kruchten, P.: The Rational Unified Process – An Introduction. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Davis, A., Dieste, O., Hickey, A., Juristo, N., Moreno, A.M.: Effectiveness of requirements elicitation techniques: empirical results derived from a systematic review. In: 14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE 2006,‏ pp. 179–188. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Neill, C.J., Laplante, P.A.: Requirements engineering: the state of the practice. IEEE Softw. 20(6), 40–45 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Berry, D.M., Kamsties, E.: Ambiguity in requirements specification. In: do Prado Leite, J.C.S., Doorn, J.H. (eds) Perspectives on Software Requirements. The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol 753. Springer, Boston (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0465-8_2

  23. Kitchenham, B.A., Pickard, L., Linkman, S., Jones, P.: A framework for evaluating a software bidding model. Inf. Softw. Technol. 47(11), 747–760 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jalote, P.A.: Concise Introduction to Software Engineering. Springer, London (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-302-6

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Mili, H., Tremblay, G., Jaoude, G.B., Lefebvre, É., Elabed, L., Boussaidi, G.E.: Business process modeling languages: sorting through the alphabet soup. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 43(1), 4 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bider, I.: State-oriented business process modeling: principles, theory and practice (Doctoral dissertation, Data-och systemvetenskap) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hove, S.E., Anda, B.: Experiences from conducting semi-structured interviews in empirical software engineering research. In: 11th IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium, METRICS 2005, pp. 10. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shishkov, B., Dietz, J.L.: Deriving use cases from business processes, the advantages of demo. In: ICEIS, no. 3, pp. 138–146 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2673-0_29

  29. Turkman, S., Taweel, A.: Business process model driven automatic software requirements generation. In: Shishkov, B. (ed.) BMSD 2019. LNBIP, vol. 356, pp. 270–278. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24854-3_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adel Taweel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Turkman, S., Taweel, A. (2020). Business Process Model Driven Approach for Automatic Use Case Model Generation. In: Shishkov, B. (eds) Business Modeling and Software Design. BMSD 2020. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 391. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52306-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52306-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52305-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52306-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics