Advertisement

Adaptable Knowledge-Driven Information Systems Improving Knowledge Transfers

Design of Context-Sensitive, AR-Enabled Furniture Assemblies
Conference paper
  • 418 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 391)

Abstract

A growing number of business processes can be characterized as knowledge-intensive. The ability to speed up the transfer of knowledge between any kind of knowledge carriers in business processes with AR techniques can lead to a huge competitive advantage, for instance in manufacturing. This includes the transfer of person-bound knowledge as well as externalized knowledge of physical and virtual objects. The contribution builds on a time-dependent knowledge transfer model and conceptualizes an adaptable, AR-based application. Having the intention to accelerate the speed of knowledge transfers between a manufacturer and an information system, empirical results of an experimentation show the validity of this approach. For the first time, it will be possible to discover how to improve the transfer among knowledge carriers of an organization with knowledge-driven information systems (KDIS). Within an experiment setting, the paper shows how to improve the quantitative effects regarding the quality and amount of time needed for an example manufacturing process realization by an adaptable KDIS.

Keywords

Augmented reality Knowledge transfers Empirical studies Context-aware computing Adaptable software systems Business process improvement 

References

  1. 1.
    Alavi, M., Leidner, D.E.: Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Q. 25(1), 107–136 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gronau, N., Grum, M.: The creation of a time-dependent knowledge transfer model. Work Report WI-2018-01, University of Potsdam, February 2018Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gronau, N., Weber, E.: Management of knowledge intensive business processes. In: Desel, J., Pernici, B., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3080, pp. 163–178. Springer, Heidelberg (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25970-1_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gronau, N.: Modeling and Analyzing Knowledge Intensive Business Processes with KMDL: Comprehensive Insights Into Theory and Practice. Series on Business Information Systems. Gito, Berlin (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Strambach, S.: Knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) as drivers of multilevel knowledge dynamics. Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manage. 10(2–4), 152–174 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sigmanek, C., Lantow, B.: A survey on modelling knowledge-intensive business processes from the perspective of knowledge management. In: KMIS 2015 - Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing, Part of the 7th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (IC3K 2015), Lisbon, Portugal, 12–14 November 2015, vol. 3, pp. 325–332, 2015Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marjanovic, O., Freeze, R.: Knowledge intensive business processes: theoretical foundations and research challenges. In: 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10, January 2011Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Albers, A., et al.: Influencing factors and methods for knowledge transfer situations in product generation engineering based on the SECI model. In: NordDesign, Linköping, Sweden, 14–17 August 2018 (2018, in Press)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peffers, K., et al.: The design science research process: A model for producing and presenting information systems research. In: 1st International Conference on Design Science in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST), vol. 24, pp. 83–106, August 2006Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grum, M., Gronau, N.: A visionary way to novel process optimizations. In: Shishkov, B. (ed.) BMSD 2017. LNBIP, vol. 309, pp. 1–24. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78428-1_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaizen, M.I.: The Key to Japan’s Competitive Success. McGraw-Hill Education Ltd., New York (1986)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shewhart, W.A., Deming, W.E.: Statistical method from the view-point of quality control. IX + 155 p. The Graduate School, Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., (1939)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Deming, W.E.: Elementary principles of the statistical control of quality: a series of lectures. Nippon Kagaku Gijutsu Remmei (1950)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deming, W.E.: Out of the Crisis. MIT Press, Cambridge (1986)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deming, W.E.: The New Economics, pp. 51–56. MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Cambridge (1993)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moen, R., Norman, C.: Evolution of the PDCA cycle (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ishikawa, D.K.: What Is Total Quality Control?: The Japanese Way (Business Management). Prentice Hall Trade, Upper Saddle River (1985)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. Harper Business (1993)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Davenport, T.H., Prusak, L.: Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Ubiquity, vol. 2000, August 2000Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K., Nonaka, I.: Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to Unlock the Mystery of Tacit Knowledge and Release the Power of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Polanyi, M., Sen, A.: The tacit dimension. University of Chicago Press, May 2009Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Björkman, I., Fey, C.F., Park, H.J.: MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 34(6), 586–599 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gronau, N., Grum, M., Zaiser, A., Rapp, S., Weber, E., Albers, A.: Knowledge Transfer Speed Optimizations in Product Development Contexts. GITO mbH Verlag, Berlin (2019)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Turner, L.A.: Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J. Mixed Methods Res. 1(2), 112–133 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    IKEA. “Metod," Assembly Instruction AA-675849-3, Inter IKEA Systems B.V. 1999–2018 (2012). https://www.ikea.com/de/de/catalog/products/S09926341/

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PotsdamPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations