Skip to main content

From High-Fidelity Patient Simulators to Robotics and Artificial Intelligence: A Discussion Paper on New Challenges to Enhance Learning in Nursing Education

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 10th International Conference. Workshops (MIS4TEL 2020)

Abstract

High-fidelity simulation (HFS) is an educational method based on technological mannequins which faithfully reproduces both physiological or physiopathological human body responses to specific clinical conditions and nursing care. When the traditional education is integrated with HFS, improvements in nursing students’ knowledge, performance, self-efficacy, self-confidence, problem solving ability, and critical thinking were reported, as well as relational and empathic skills. The level of realism reached in HFS sessions, defined as the ‘degree to which a simulated experience approaches reality’ demonstrated a positive association with students’ learning outcomes. Most of high-fidelity patient simulators are computer-driven static mannequins which resemble adult or child human body dimensions. However, they show limits that should be overcome to provide a more realistic full-body experience in nursing education. In this regard, robotics and artificial intelligence have a key role for the technological evolution of nursing educational systems and their introduction in the simulation field is opening new perspectives that will produce unavoidably the redefinition of educational standards with beneficial implications for future nursing care. In this perspective, new challenges for nursing education has been discussed in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gaba, D.M.: The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual. Saf. Health Care 1, i2–10 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maran, N.J., Glavin, R.J.: Low- to high-fidelity simulation - a continuum of medical education? Med. Educ. 37(Suppl 1), 22–28 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Presado, M.H.C.V., Colaco, S., Rafael, H., Baixinho, C.L., Felix, I., Saraiva, C., Rebelo, I.: Learning with high fidelity simulation. Cien Saude Colet. 23(1), 51–59 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Warren, J.N., Luctkar-Flude, M., Godfrey, C., Lukewich, J.: A systematic review of the effectiveness of simulation-based education on satisfaction and learning outcomes in nurse practitioner programs. Nurse Educ. Today 46, 99–108 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. La Cerra, C., Dante, A., Caponnetto, V., Franconi, I., Gaxhja, E., Petrucci, C., Alfes, C.M., Lancia, L.: Effects of high-fidelity simulation based on life-threatening clinical condition scenarios on learning outcomes of undergraduate and postgraduate nursing students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 9(2), e025306 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, S.J., Roehrs, C.J.: High-fidelity simulation: Factors correlated with nursing student satisfaction and self-confidence. Nurs. Educ. Perspect. 30(2), 74–78 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. INACSL Standards Committee: INACSL standards of best practice: SimulationSM debriefing. Clin. Simul Nurs. 12(S), S21-S25 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Page-Cutrara, K.: Use of prebriefing in nursing simulation: a literature review. J. Nurs. Educ. 53(3), 136–141 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bae, J., Lee, J., Jang, Y., Lee, Y.: Development of simulation education debriefing protocol with faculty guide for enhancement clinical reasoning. BMC Med. Educ. 19(1), 197 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sherwood, R.J., Francis, G.: The effect of mannequin fidelity on the achievement of learning outcomes for nursing, midwifery and allied healthcare practitioners: systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ. Today 69, 81–94 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Federspil, G.: Logica clinica - I principi del metodo in medicina. McGraw-Hill, Milano (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hogan-Quigley, B., Palm, M.L., Bickley, L.: Valutazione per l’assistenza infermieristica. Esame fisico e storia della persona assistita, 1st edn. Casa Editrice Ambrosiana, Milano (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maalouf, N., Sidaoui, A., Elhajj, I.H., Asmar, D.: Robotics in nursing: a scoping review. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 50(6), 590–600 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Erikson, H., Salzmann-Erikson, M.: Future challenges of robotics and artificial intelligence in nursing: what can we learn from monsters in popular culture? Perm. J. 20(3), 15–243 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Amisha, P.M., Pathania, M., Rathaur, V.K.: Overview of artificial intelligence in medicine. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care. 8(7), 2328–2331 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vogan, A.A., Alnajjar, F., Gochoo, M., Khalid, S.: Robots, AI, and cognitive training in an era of mass age-related cognitive decline: a systematic review. IEEE Access 8, 18284–18304 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miran, L., Murata, K., Ameyama, K., Yamazoe, H., Joo-Ho, L.: Development and quantitative assessment of an elbow joint robot for elderly care training. Intell. Serv. Robot. 12(4), 277–287 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin, C., Huang, Z., Kanai-Pak, M., Maeda, J., Kitajima, Y., Nakamura, M., Kuwahara, N., Ogata, T., Ota, J.: Effect of practice on similar and dissimilar skills in patient transfer through training with a robot patient. Adv. Robot. 33(6), 278–292 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhifeng, H., Takahiro, K., Masako, K.P., Yasuko, K., Mitsuhiro, N., Kyoko, A., Noriaki, K., Taiki, O., Jun, O.: Design and evaluation of robot patient for nursing skill training in patient transfer. Adv. Robot. 29(19), 1269–1285 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhifeng, H., Chingszu, L., Masako, K.P., Jukai, M., Yasuko, K., Mitsuhiro, N., Noriaki, K., Taiki, O., Jun, O.: Robot patient design to simulate various patients for transfer training. IEEE ASME Trans. Mechatron. 22(5), 2079–2090 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Robert, N.: How artificial intelligence is changing nursing. Nurs. Manage. 50(9), 30–39 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pepito, J.A., Locsin, R.: Can nurses remain relevant in a technologically advanced future? Int. J. Nurs. Sci. 6(1), 106–110 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angelo Dante .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dante, A. et al. (2021). From High-Fidelity Patient Simulators to Robotics and Artificial Intelligence: A Discussion Paper on New Challenges to Enhance Learning in Nursing Education. In: Kubincová, Z., Lancia, L., Popescu, E., Nakayama, M., Scarano, V., Gil, A. (eds) Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 10th International Conference. Workshops. MIS4TEL 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1236. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52287-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics