Skip to main content

Analysing the Credibility of Theories of Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Theories of Change

Part of the book series: Sustainable Finance ((SUFI))

Abstract

Simply put, and most unfortunately, current interpretations and applications of the Theory of Change concept have drifted so far from their origins as to render them useless. As inflammatory a statement as that may appear to be, it is also the single biggest and most annoying elephant in the development world’s room. And as the development world continues to shift focus from solely philanthropic and development finance funding to self-funded social enterprises and the very trendy impact investing, this elephant has grown well beyond the confines of that room.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Weiss, C.H., 1997 How can Theory-Based Evaluation Make Greater Headway Evaluation Review: A Journal of Applied Research Vol 21 (4): 24 – Aug 1 pp. 501–524.

  2. 2.

    Rogers, P.J., 2007 Theory Based Evaluations: Reflections Ten Years On, New Directions for Evaluation, no 114 Summer, Wiley Periodicals Inc DOI: 10.1002/ev.225

  3. 3.

    Weiss, C.H., 1997 How can Theory-Based Evaluation Make Greater Headway Evaluation Review: A Journal of Applied Research Vol 21 (4): 24 – Aug 1, pp. 501–524.

  4. 4.

    Nederveen Pieterse, J., 2010 Development Theory: Deconstructions/Reconstructions Chapter 1: Trends in Development Theory pp. 2–3. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446279083.n1

  5. 5.

    Goodland, R., Ledec, G., Neoclassical economics and principles of sustainable development, Environmental and Scientific Affairs, Projects Policy Department, The World Bank, Washington, DC 20433, U.S.A. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(87)90043-3

  6. 6.

    Nederveen Pieterse, J., 2010 Development Theory: Deconstructions/Reconstructions Chapter 1: Trends in Development Theory p. 5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446279083.n1

  7. 7.

    Kothari, U., & Minogue, M. (2002). Development Theory and Practice: Critical Perspectives. Basingstoke: Macmillan Publishers Ltd. ISBN: 0333800710

  8. 8.

    Aiken, C.B., Keller, S.P. 2007 The CEOs Role in Leading Transformation website: McKinsey February 2007 available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/the-ceos-role-in-leading-transformation

  9. 9.

    Nohria, N., Beer, M., 2000 Cracking the Code of Change, Harvard Business Review May-June 2000 Issue available at: https://hbr.org/2000/05/cracking-the-code-of-change

  10. 10.

    Saltzman, J. 2018 How CEOs can inspire social change within their organizations Forbes Councils August 29 available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesnycouncil/2018/08/29/how-ceos-can-inspire-social-change-within-their-organizations/#256636116052

  11. 11.

    Folkman, J., 2018 Measuring Engagement Does Not Improve It, Forbes March 13 2018 available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/joefolkman/2018/03/13/measuring-engagement-does-not-improve-it/#73436273775f

  12. 12.

    Brunetto, Y., Teo, S.T.T., Shacklock, K., Farr‐Wharton, R., 2012 Emotional intelligence, job satisfaction, well‐being and engagement: explaining organisational commitment and turnover intentions in policing in Human Resource Management Journal 22(4) November 2012 DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2012.00198.x

  13. 13.

    Friere, P., (2000) Pedagogy of the Oppressed (30th anniversary ed.) New York: Continuum.

  14. 14.

    The Barr Center, The Barr Model available at: https://barrcenter.org/strategies

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vun, G. (2021). Analysing the Credibility of Theories of Change. In: Wendt, K. (eds) Theories of Change. Sustainable Finance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52275-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics