Abstract
Successful implementation remains a challenge as technology-enhanced learning (TEL) continues to progress. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a TEL maturity model as an assessment method and improvement roadmap. Recalling the analogy standing on the shoulders of giants, it emphasizes that we should build a model on previously established knowledge in literatures. Nonetheless, this resolution is followed by several challenges. They include the scope of discussion, purposive review, subjectivity, interpretable result, and trustworthiness. Thus, we set out the research objective on determining TEL maturity constructs using a literature-based knowledge discovery. This study uses content analysis as a technique to process the literatures, covering 548 research papers from 12 repositories. As an approach to building constructs and resolve the challenges as mentioned earlier, this study discusses how to set a research direction and uses Leximancer to improve the trustworthiness for both the analysis process and results. We then interpret the results to build a TEL maturity model constructs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kirkwood, A., Price, L.: Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is “enhanced” and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learn. Media Technol. 39, 6–36 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.770404
Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information system research. MIS Q. 28, 75–105 (2004)
Leximancer Pty Ltd: Leximancer User Guide (2018)
Hwang, G.-J., Tsai, C.-C.: Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: a review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010: colloquium. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 42, E65–E70 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01183.x
Yahya, S., Ahmad, E.A., Jalil, K.A.: The definition and characteristics of ubiquitous learning: a discussion. Int. J. Educ. Dev. Using Inf. Commun. Technol. (IJEDICT). 6, 117–127 (2010)
Rahmah, A., Santoso, H.B., Hasibuan, Z.A.: E-learning process maturity level: a conceptual framework. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, p. 012028 (2017)
Vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Riemer, K., Niehaves, B., Plattfaut, R., Cleven, A.: Standing on the shoulders of giants: challenges and recommendations of literature search in information systems research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 37 (2015). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03709
Birks, M., Mills, J.: Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide. SAGE, Los Angeles (2015)
Einstein, A.: I have no special talents. I am just passionately curious (2011)
Erlingsson, C., Brysiewicz, P.: A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. Afr. J. Emerg. Med. 7, 93–99 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001
Acknowledgement
This publication is within the research program funded by Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education with number: PRJ-1234/LPDP.3/2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rahmah, A., Santoso, H.B., Hasibuan, Z.A. (2020). Conceptualizing Technology-Enhanced Learning Constructs: A Journey of Seeking Knowledge Using Literature-Based Discovery. In: Arai, K., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R. (eds) Intelligent Computing. SAI 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1228. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52249-0_50
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52249-0_50
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52248-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52249-0
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)