Advertisement

Report on “AI and Human Thought and Emotion”

  • Sam FreedEmail author
Conference paper
  • 272 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 12177)

Abstract

No fundamental new ideas have appeared in AI for decades because of a deadlocked discussion between the technologists and their philosophical critics. Both sides claim possession of the one (dogmatic) truth: Technologists are committed to writing code, while critics insist that AI bears no resemblance to how humans cope in the world. The book charts a middle course between the critics and practitioners of AI, remaining committed to writing code while maintaining a fixed gaze on the human condition. This is done by reviving a technique long-shunned in cognitive science: Introspection. Introspection was rejected as a scientific method since 1913, but technology is committed to “what works” rather than to science’s “best explanation”. Introspection is shown to be both a legitimate and a promising source of ideas for AI. The book details the development process of AI based on introspection, from the initial introspective descriptions to working code.

This book is unique in that it starts with philosophical (and historical) discussions, and ends with examples of working novel algorithms. The book was originally a PhD thesis. It was edited for book form with two new chapters added.

Keywords

Human-like AI Anthropic AI AGI 

References

  1. Dreyfus, H.L.: What Computers Can’t Do/The Limits of Artificial Intelligence (Revised). Harper & Row, New York (1979)Google Scholar
  2. Dreyfus, H.L.: Why Heideggerian AI failed and how fixing it would require making it more Heideggerian. Artif. Intell. 171(18), 1137–1160 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.10.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ericsson, K.A., Simon, H.A.: Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data, 2nd edn. MIT (1993). http://capitadiscovery.co.uk/sussex-ac/items/543010
  4. Freed, S.: AI and Human Thought and Emotion. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. McCorduck, P.: Machines Who Think: A Personal Inquiry into the History and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence (25th anniversary update). A.K. Peters, Natick (2004)Google Scholar
  6. McNeill, D., Freiberger, P.: Fuzzy Logic: The Revolutionary Computer Technology that Is Changing Our World, 1st edn. Touchstone/Simon & Schuster, New York (1994)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Watson, J.B.: Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychol. Rev. 20(2), 158–177 (1913).  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Watson, J.B.: Is Thinking Merely Action of Language Mechanisms1? (V.). Br. J. Psychol. Gener. Sect. 11(1), 87–104 (1920).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1920.tb00010.x
  9. Winograd, T., Flores, F.: Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Ablex (1986). http://prism.talis.com/sussex-ac/items/272586

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SussexBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations