Abstract
This chapter analyzes the challenges of a materialistic approach to tourism within geography. These challenges will be examined in the light of the theoretical changes that tourism research has undergone over the past three decades. While the economic perspective has been privileged up until the end of the 1980s, tourism studies have been predominantly influenced by the “cultural turn” since the early 1990s. Although this theoretical shift has led to a better understanding of tourism, and specifically of tourist practices and imaginaries, it also tends to remove tourism research from the study of structural inequalities. Based on this observation, I present a theoretical reflection that brings tourism geography back into a materialistic approach. Such a proposal is mostly based on theoretical debates on the spatial dimension of tourism. I particularly use the theoretical legacy of the Marxist philosopher Henri Lefebvre whose work has inspired a political economy of space. The return to historical materialism is then seen as a way of reviving the critical approach to tourism, while at the same time overcoming the weaknesses of those Marxist and structuralist approaches developed in the 1970s. In such a way, it also demonstrates the contribution of tourism studies to a broader understanding of contemporary capitalist societies, especially in relation to new forms of gentrification and urban dynamics.
This research was funded by the Pays de la Loire region under the Angers TourismLab program.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In France, this return to materialistic approaches in geography is addressed in a series of recent publications such as the thematic issue of the journal Carnets de géographes devoted to “géographies critiques” (2012), and the collective work Espaces et rapports de domination coordinated by A. Clerval, A. Fleury, J. Rebotier and S. Weber (2015).
- 2.
Personal translation.
- 3.
For a similar finding in the English-speaking context, see Gibson (2009).
- 4.
Mexico is the number one tourist destination in Latin America with approximately 39 million international visitors per year, plus many more national tourists (although this is difficult to quantify). Tourism is also a strategic activity for the national economy and ranks third after oil revenues and remesas, remittances sent home by Mexican emigrants.
- 5.
One example of this is in urban studies, where the study of conflicts has for many years given rise to a great deal of theoretical work, particularly on the question of the “right to the city” and “urban social movements”.
References
Aalbers, M. B. (2019). Introduction to the forum: From third to fifth-wave gentrification. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 110(1), 1–11.
Amirou, R. (1995). Imaginaire touristique et sociabilités du voyage (281 p). Paris: PUF.
Ateljevic, I., Pritchard, A., & Morgan, N. (2007). The critical turn in tourism studies. Innovative research methodologies (428 p). Oxford: Elsevier.
Bianchi, R. (2009). The “critical turn” in tourism studies: A radical critique. Tourism Geographies, 11(4), 484–504.
Britton, S. (1982). The political economy of tourism in the third world. Annals of Tourism Research, 9(3), 331–358.
Britton, S. (1991). Tourism, capital and place: Towards a critical geography of tourism. Environment and Planning: Society and Space, 9(4), 451–478.
Cazes, G. (1992). Tourisme et tiers-monde, un bilan controversé (Vol. 207). Paris: L’Harmattan.
Ceriani-Sebregondi, G., Chapuis, A., Gay, J.-C., Knafou, R., Stock, M., & Violier, P. (2008). Quel serait l’objet d’une “science du tourisme” ? Téoros, 27(1), en ligne. https://teoros.revues.org/1629.
Clerval, A., Fleury, A., Rebotier, J., & Weber, S. (2015). Espace et rapports de domination (400 p). Rennes: P.U.R..
Cocola-Gant, A. (2016). Holiday rentals: The new gentrification battlefront. Sociological Research Online, 21(3).
Cocola-Gant, A. (2018). Tourism gentrification. In Lees & Phillips (Eds.), Handbook in gentrification studies (pp. 281–293). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Cousin, S. (2010). L’enquête à l’épreuve du tourisme. Espacestemps.net (online). http://www.espacestemps.net/articles/le-tourisme-a-epreuve-de-enquete/.
Demanget, M., & Dumoulin, D. (2010). Introduction au dossier thématique « Tourisme patrimonial et sociétés locales en Amérique latine ». Cahiers des Amériques latines, 65, 19–25.
Doquet, A. (2010). “La force de l’impact. Paradigme théorique et réalités de terrain”, EspacesTemps.net (online) https://www.espacestemps.net/articles/force-impact/.
Franklin, A. (2001). The tourist gaze and beyond: An interview with John Urry. Tourist Studies, 1(2), 115–131.
Gibson, C. (2009). Geographies of tourism: Critical research on capitalism and local livelihoods. Progress in Human Geography, 33(4), 527–534.
Gravari-Barbas, M., & Guinand, S. (2017). Tourism and gentrifiaction in contemporary metropolises. New York: Routledge.
Gravari-Barbas, M., & Jacquot, S. (2012). Les géographes et les métiers du tourisme. Echogéo, 19, en ligne.
Harvey, D. (2010). Le nouvel impérialisme (204 p). Paris: Les prairies ordinaires.
Hiernaux, D. (2008). El giro cultural y las nuevas interpretaciones geográficas del turismo. Espaço e Tempo, 23, 177–187.
Jackson, P. (2000). Rematerializing social and cultural geography. Social & Cultural Geography, 1(1), 9–14.
Knafou, R., Bruston, M., Deprest, F., Duhamel, P., Gay, J.-C., & Sacareau, I. (1997). Une approche géographique du tourisme. L’espace géographique, 26(3), 193–204.
Lefebvre, H. (1991) [1974]. The production of space (454 p). Oxford: Blackwell.
Maccannell, D. (2001). Tourist agency. Tourist Studies, I(1), 23–37.
Marie dit Chirot, C. (2011). De la confrontation sociale à l’attrait touristique, et réciproquement. Genèse et enjeux du tourisme politique dans l’État du Chiapas. Espacestemps.net, mis en ligne le 24 octobre 2011.
Marie dit Chirot, C. (2014). Pour un morceau de terre. Enjeux sociaux et politique de la valorization touristique de l’espace au Mexique (357 p). Phd thesis, Université de Caen-Normandie.
Marie dit Chirot, C. (2015). Relaciones de propiedad y conflictos por la apropiación del espacio turístico. Análisis comparativo entre Huatulco (Oaxaca) y Playa del Carmen (Quintana Roo) en México. In G. Marín Guardado (Ed.), Sin tierras no hay paraiso.Turismo, organizaciones agrarias y apropiación territorial en México (pp. 251–273). El Sauzal (Islas Canarias): PASOS Edita.
Mcguckin, E. (2005). Travelling paradigms: Marxism, poststructuralism and the uses of theory. Anthropologica, 47(1), 67–79.
Mermet, A.-C. (2017). Airbnb and tourism gentrification. Critical insights from the exploratory analysis of the “Airbnb syndrome” in Reykjavik. In M. Gravari-Barbas & S. Guinand (Eds.), Tourism and gentrifiaction in contemporary metropolises (pp. 52–74). New York: Routledge.
Michaud, J. (2001). Anthropologie, tourisme et sociétés locales au fil des textes. Anthropologie et sociétés, 25(2), 15–33.
Milne, S., & Ateljevic, I. (2001). Tourism, economic development and the global-local nexus: Theory embracing complexity. Tourism Geographies, 4(3), 369–393.
MIT (Équipe). (2002). Tourisme I. Lieux communs (319 p). Paris: Belin.
Morell, M. (2019). Turismo y diferencial de renta: no hay vacaciones para la lucha de clase. In Cañada & Murray (Eds.), Turistificacion global. Perspectivas criticas en turismo (pp. 309–323). Barcelona: Icaria.
Pereira, I. (2015). La structuration de l’espace par les rapports sociaux. In A. Clerval, A. Fleury, J. Rebotier, & S. Weber (Eds.), Espace et rapports de domination (pp. 111–120). Rennes: P.U.R.
Reau, B. (2015). Les “Tourism Studies”: Excursions épistémologiques ou séjours interdisciplinaires? Espacestemps.net, en ligne. http://www.espacestemps.net/articles/les-tourism-studies/
Réau, B., & Poupeau, F. (2007), “L’enchantement du monde touristique”, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, n°170, pp.4–13.
Roux, S. (2009). De quelques dynamiques contemporaines en anthropologie du tourisme francophone. Cahiers d’études africaines, 193–194, 595–602.
Roux, S. (2011). No money, no honey. Économies intimes du tourisme sexuel en Thaïlande (276 p). Paris: La Découverte.
Sacareau, I., Taunay, B., & Peyvel, E. (2015). La mondialisation du tourisme. In Les nouvelles frontières d’une pratique (266 p). Rennes: P.U.R.
Simoni, V. (2008). Shifting power. The (de) stabilization of asymmetries in the realm of tourism in Cuba. Tsansta: Review of the Swiss Anthropological Society, 13(2008), 11–19.
Smith, N. (1979). Toward a theory of gentrification: A back to the city movement by capital, not people. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45(4), 538–548.
Smith, N. (1987). Gentrification and the rent gap. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 77(3), 462–465.
Turner, L., & Ash, J. (1975). The golden hordes: International tourism and the pleasure periphery (319 p). Londres: Constable & Co.
Urry, J. (1990). The tourist gaze (p. 183). Londres: Sage.
Yrigoy, I. (2019). Rent gap reloaded: Airbnb and the shift from residential to touristic rental housing in the Palma Old Quarter in Mallorca, Spain. Urban Studies, 56(13), 2709–2726.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marie dit Chirot, C. (2021). Rematerializing Tourism Studies: Toward a Political Economy of Tourist Space. In: Stock, M. (eds) Progress in French Tourism Geographies. Geographies of Tourism and Global Change. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52136-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52136-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52135-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52136-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)