Skip to main content

Physical Modalities for the Treatment of Rosacea

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rosacea

Part of the book series: Updates in Clinical Dermatology ((UCD))

  • 519 Accesses

Abstract

Rosacea is characterized by a wide variety of vascular changes. Apart from telangiectasia and erythema, often so-called flushing occurs. These vascular abnormalities can be targeted with specific light and laser devices. In addition to KTP laser, dye laser (FDL), and Nd:YAG laser, also intense pulsed light devices (IPLs) are used. The described therapeutic effects include reduction in vascular abnormalities and even improvement in papulopustular changes. While the KTP laser shows very good results in telangiectasia, the dye laser and IPL devices are used preferably in erythema. The Nd:YAG laser is also a possibility for patients with telangiectasia and erythema. However, compared to other laser and light devices the Nd:YAG laser carries the highest risk of unpredictable scarring.

Phymatous changes are another clinical manifestation of rosacea, mostly affecting the nose (rhinophyma). Moderate and severe cases are commonly treated with ablation modalities. Traditional surgery is a treatment option, but is often associated with major intraoperative bleeding. Alternative methods include electrosurgery and dermabrasion, though both methods can cause scarring. Newer methods such as CO2 laser ablation, possibly in combination with the erbium:YAG laser, are safe alternatives with a lower risk of complications. In a very recent study the application of the 577-nm Pro Yellow laser has also shown good results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schaller M, Schöfer H, Homey B, et al. Rosacea management: update on general measures and topical treatment options. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2016;14:17–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schaller M, Schöfer H, Homey B, et al. State of the art: systemic rosacea management. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2016;14:29–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Steinhoff M, Schauber J, Leyden JJ. New insights into rosacea pathophysiology: a review of recent findings. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69:S15–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Holmes AS, Steinhoff M. Integrative concepts of rosacea pathophysiology, presentation, and therapeutics. Exp Dermatol. 2017;26(8):659–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arndt KA. Argon laser therapy of small cutaneous vascular lesions. Arch Dermatol. 1982;118:220–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Laube S, Lanigan SW. Laser treatment of rosacea. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2002;1:188–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van Zuuren EJ, Fedorowicz Z, Carter B, van der Linden MM, Charland L. Interventions for rosacea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;4:CD003262.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clark SM, Lanigan SW, Marks R. Laser treatment of erythema and telangiectasia associated with rosacea. Lasers Med Sci. 2002;17:26–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jasim ZF, Woo WK, Handley JM. Long-pulsed (6-ms) pulsed dye laser treatment of rosacea-associated telangiectasia using subpurpuric clinical threshold. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30:37–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bernstein EF, Kligman A. Rosacea treatment using the new-generation, high-energy, 595 nm, long pulse-duration pulsed-dye laser. Lasers Surg Med. 2008;40:233–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gallo R, Drago F, Paolino S, Parodi A. Rosacea treatments: what’s new and what’s on the horizon? Am J Clin Dermatol. 2010;11:299–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tan ST, Bialostocki A, Armstrong JR. Pulsed dye laser therapy for rosacea. Br J Plast Surg. 2004;57:303–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tan SR, Tope WD. Pulsed dye laser treatment of rosacea improves erythema, symptomatology, and quality of life. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;51:592–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lonne-Rahm S, Nordlind K, Edstrom DW, Ros AM, Berg M. Laser treatment of rosacea: a pathoetiological study. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140:1345–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Salem SA, Abdel Fattah NS, Tantawy SM, El-Badawy NM, Abd El-Aziz YA. Neodymium-yttrium aluminum garnet laser versus pulsed dye laser in erythemato-telangiectatic rosacea: comparison of clinical efficacy and effect on cutaneous substance (p) expression. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2013;12:187–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim SJ, Lee Y, Seo YJ, Lee JH, Im M. Comparative efficacy of radiofrequency and pulsed dye laser in the treatment of rosacea. Dermatol Surg. 2017;43:204–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. West TB, Alster TS. Comparison of the long-pulse dye (590-595 nm) and ktp (532 nm) lasers in the treatment of facial and leg telangiectasias. Dermatol Surg. 1998;24:221–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Uebelhoer NS, Bogle MA, Stewart B, Arndt KA, Dover JS. A split-face comparison study of pulsed 532-nm ktp laser and 595-nm pulsed dye laser in the treatment of facial telangiectasias and diffuse telangiectatic facial erythema. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:441–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Say EM, Okan G, Gokdemir G. Treatment outcomes of long-pulsed Nd: Yag laser for two different subtypes of rosacea. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2015;8:16–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Willey A, Anderson RR, Azpiazu JL, Bakus AD, Barlow RJ, Dover JS, Garden JM, Kilmer SL, Landa N, Manstein D, Ross EV Jr, Sadick N, Tanghetti EA, Yaghmai D, Zelickson BD. Complications of laser dermatologic surgery. Lasers Surg Med. 2006;38:1–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Karsai S, Roos S, Raulin C. Treatment of facial telangiectasia using a dual-wavelength laser system (595 and 1,064 nm): a randomized controlled trial with blinded response evaluation. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34:702–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alam M, Voravutinon N, Warycha M, Whiting D, Nodzenski M, Yoo S, West DP, Veledar E, Poon E. Comparative effectiveness of nonpurpuragenic 595-nm pulsed dye laser and microsecond 1064-nm neodymium:Yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser for treatment of diffuse facial erythema: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69:438–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baek JO, Hur H, Ryu HR, Kim JS, Lee KR, Kim YR, Choi KH. Treatment of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea with the fractionation of high-fluence, long-pulsed 595-nm pulsed dye laser. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017;16:12–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Strand M, Bergqvist G, Griffith S, Bergqvist E. The effect of recurrent pulsed dye laser treatments in rosacea patients. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2017;19:160–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ko HS, Suh YJ, Byun JW, Choi GS, Shin J. Pulsed dye laser treatment comined with oral minocycline reduces recurrence rate of rosacea. Ann Dermatol. 2017;29:543–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Bernstein EF, Schomacker K, Paranjape A, Jones CJ. Pulsed dye laser treatment of rosacea using a novel 15 mm diameter treatment beam. Lasers Surg Med. 2018;50:808–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Taub AF. Treatment of rosacea with intense pulsed light. J Drugs Dermatol. 2003;2:254–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kassir R, Kolluru A, Kassir M. Intense pulsed light for the treatment of rosacea and telangiectasias. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2011;13:216–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Papageorgiou P, Clayton W, Norwood S, Chopra S, Rustin M. Treatment of rosacea with intense pulsed light: significant improvement and long-lasting results. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159:628–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Neuhaus IM, Zane LT, Tope WD. Comparative efficacy of nonpurpuragenic pulsed dye laser and intense pulsed light for erythematotelangiectatic rosacea. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35:920–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nymann P, Hedelund L, Haedersdal M. Long-pulsed dye laser vs. Intense pulsed light for the treatment of facial telangiectasias: a randomized controlled trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010;24:143–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tsunoda K, Akasaka K, Akasaka T, Amano H. Successful treatment of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea with intense pulsed light: report of 13 cases. J Dermatol. 2018;45:1113–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sadick H, Riedel F, Bran G. Rhinophyma in rosacea. What does surgery achieve? Hautarzt. 2011;62:834–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hoasjoe DK, Stucker FJ. Rhinophyma: review of pathophysiology and treatment. J Otolaryngol. 1995;24:51–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Farina R, Piza Pde T. Blepharoptosis; blepharoplasty by a modified wiener-lexer technique. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 1950;5:97–101, illust.

    Google Scholar 

  36. González LF, Herrera H, Motta A. Electrosurgery for the treatment of moderate or severe rhinophyma. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2018;109:e23–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Krausz AE, Goldberg DJ, Ciocon DH, Tinklepaugh AJ. Procedural management of rhinophyma: a comprehensive review. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018;17:960–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Moreira A, Leite I, Guedes R, Baptista A, Mota G. Surgical treatment of rhinophyma using carbon dioxide (co2) laser and pulsed dye laser (pdl). J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2010;12:73–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Goon PK, Dalal M, Peart FC. The gold standard for decortication of rhinophyma: combined erbium-yag/co2 laser. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2004;28:456–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Menezes N, Moreira A, Mota G, Baptista A. Quality of life and rosacea: pulsed dye laser impact. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2009;11:139–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Moustafa F, Lewallen RS, Feldman SR. The psychological impact of rosacea and the influence of current management options. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71:973–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hofmann, M.A., Lehmann, P. (2020). Physical Modalities for the Treatment of Rosacea. In: Cary, J.H., Maibach, H.I. (eds) Rosacea. Updates in Clinical Dermatology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52097-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52097-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52096-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52097-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics