Skip to main content

Introduction to Clinical Rosacea

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rosacea

Part of the book series: Updates in Clinical Dermatology ((UCD))

  • 630 Accesses

Abstract

Rosacea is a syndrome and not a pathogenically defined disease. Currently, there is no well-established basic mechanism of disease established for rosacea. The classification of rosacea began with the distinction from acne, and by the last half of the twentieth century, the classifications of experts in different countries had become aligned around the notion of rosacea having four or more phenotypic subtypes with some versions allowing for possible, but not obligatory, progression of these phenotypic subtypes as “stages.” While these classifications from different authors consistently recognized similar phenotypic subtypes, there were differences in their precise definitions. In 2002 a consensus committee of the National Rosacea Society (NRS) sought to develop definitions which would provide for a more standardized classification system. These four classic phenotypic subtypes of rosacea have important utilities, including the increased awareness that use of products demonstrated to improve only papulopustular rosacea may lead to disappointment in physicians and their patients with only erythematotelangiectatic rosacea.

In addition to providing a better understanding of the current classification system, this chapter will serve as an introduction to rosacea and its epidemiology, genetic association, comorbidities, clinical/histological findings, and common mimickers. Rosacea is a common inflammatory dermatosis, considered most prevalent in fair-skinned individuals. There are no diagnostic or histologic criteria to diagnose rosacea. Therefore, obtaining a complete and thorough history, along with a pertinent review of systems, is essential not only in diagnosing rosacea but also in correctly assigning clinical subtype (s) (a patient may have more than one). Screening the medication history is necessary, as certain vasoactive agents can enhance flushing in rosacea patients. Assessing modifiable lifestyle factors should also be a part of a complete history-taking, as smoking and alcohol have long been implicated in the development and/or exacerbation of the disease. Lastly, rosacea mimickers should be carefully considered in differential diagnoses through recognizing the subtleties in the physical findings and occasionally obtaining histological information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Plewig G, Kligman AM. Acne and rosacea, 3rd completely revised and enlarged edition. Wurzburg: Springer; 2000. p. 295–342.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reinholz M, Ruzicka T, Schauber J. Cathelicidin LL-37: an antimicrobial peptide with a role in inflammatory skin disease. Ann Dermatol. 2012;24(2):126–35.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Holmes AD, Steinhoff M. Integrative concepts of rosacea pathophysiology, clinical presentation and new therapeutics. Exp Dermatol. 2017;26(8):659–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Powell F. Rosacea: diagnosis and management. New York: CRC Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sobye P. Aetiology and pathogenesis of rosacea. Acta Derm Venereol. 1950;30(2):137–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilkin JK. Rosacea. A review. Int J Dermatol. 1983;22:393–400.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilkin JK. Rosacea: pathophysiology and treatment. Arch Dermatol. 1994;130(3):359–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilkin J, Dahl M, Detmar M, Drake L, Feinstein A, Odom R, Powell F. Standard classification of rosacea: report of the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee on the classification and staging of rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46(4):584–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Helfrich YR, Maier LE, Cui Y, Fisher GJ, Chubb H, Fligiel S, Sachs D, Varani J, Voorhees J. Clinical, histologic, and molecular analysis of differences between erythematotelangiectatic rosacea and telangiectatic photoaging. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(8):825–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilkin JK. Erythematotelangiectatic rosacea and telangiectatic photoaging: same, separate, and/or sequential? JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(8):821–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tan J, Blume-Peytavi U, Ortonne JP, Wilhelm K, Marticou L, Baltas E, Rivier M, Petit L, Martel P. An observational cross-sectional survey of rosacea: clinical associations and progression between subtypes. Br J Dermatol. 2013;169(3):555–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Berg MATS, Liden STURE. An epidemiological study of rosacea. Acta Derm Venereol. 1989;69(5):419–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sulk M, Seeliger S, Aubert J, Schwab VD, Cevikbas F, Rivier M, Nowak P, Voegel JJ, Buddenkott J, Steinhoff M. Distribution and expression of non-neuronal transient receptor potential (TRPV) ion channels in rosacea. J Investig Dermatol. 2012;132(4):1253–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Steinhoff M, Schmelz M, Schauber J. Facial erythema of rosacea–aetiology, different pathophysiologies and treatment options. Acta Derm Venereol. 2016;96(5):579–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee WJ, Jung JM, Lee YJ, Won CH, Chang SE, Choi JH, Moon KC, Lee MW. Histopathological analysis of 226 patients with rosacea according to rosacea subtype and severity. Am J Dermatopathol. 2016;38(5):347–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Powell FC. Rosacea. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(8):793–803.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Current FDA approved labeling for ORACEA accessed on August 8, 2018. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/050805s008lbl.pdf

  18. Danby FW. Rosacea, acne rosacea, and actinic telangiectasia. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;52(3):539–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gallo RL, Granstein RD, Kang S, Mannis M, Steinhoff M, Tan J, Thiboutot D. Standard classification and pathophysiology of rosacea: the 2017 update by the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(1):148–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wilkin J, Dahl M, Detmar M, et al. Standard grading system for rosacea: report of the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee on the classification and staging of rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;50:907–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilkin JK. Use of topical products for maintaining remission in rosacea. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(1):79–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wollina U. Classical clinical presentations of rosacea. In: Pathogenesis and treatment of acne and rosacea. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2014. p. 653–9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Marks R. Rosacea. Hopeless hypothesis, marvelous myths and dermal disorganization. In: Acne and related disorders. London: Dunitz; 1989. p. 293–9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tan J, Almeida LMC, Bewley A, Cribier B, Dlova NC, Gallo R, Kautz G, Mannis M, Oon HH, Rajagopalan M, Thiboutot D, Troielli P, Webster G, Wu Y, van Zuuren EJ, Schaller M, Steinhoff M. Updating the diagnosis, classification and assessment of rosacea: recommendations from the global ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) panel. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(2):431–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilkin J. Updating the diagnosis, classification and assessment of rosacea by effacement of subtypes. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(2):597–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schaller M, Almeida LMC, Bewley A, Cribier B, Dlova NC, Kautz G, Mannis M, Oon HH, Rajagopalan M, Steinhoff M, Troielli P, Webster G, Wu Y, van Zuuren E, Tan J, Thiboutot D. Rosacea treatment update: recommendations from the global ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) panel. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(2):465–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Spoendlin J, Voegel JJ, Jick SS, Meier CR. A study on the epidemiology of rosacea in the UK. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167(3):598–605.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chosidow O, Cribier B. Epidemiology of rosacea: updated data. In: Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie, vol. 138. Paris: Elsevier Masson; 2011. p. S179–83.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tan J, Berg M. Rosacea: current state of epidemiology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69(6):S27–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Al-Dabagh A, Davis SA, McMichael AJ, Feldman SR. Rosacea in skin of color: not a rare diagnosis. Dermatol Online J. 2014;20(10):p.13.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Donaldson KE, Karp CL, Dunbar MT. Evaluation and treatment of children with ocular rosacea. Cornea. 2007;26(1):42–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kellen R, Silverberg NB. Pediatric rosacea. Cutis. 2016;98(1):49–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kroshinsky D, Glick SA. Pediatric rosacea. Dermatol Ther. 2006;19(4):196–201.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV. Rosacea and related disorders. In: Powell FC, Raghallaigh SN, ed. Dermatology. 3rd ed. China: Elsevier Saunders; 2009:561–569.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cribier B. Rosacea under the microscope: characteristic histological findings. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27(11):1336–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ozkol HU, Calka O, Akdeniz N, Baskan E, Ozkol H. Rosacea and exposure to tandoor heat: is there an association? Int J Dermatol. 2015;54(12):1429–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Muller MD, Sauder CL, Ray CA. Mental stress elicits sustained and reproducible increases in skin sympathetic nerve activity. Physiol Rep. 2013;1(1):e00002.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Rainer BM, Fischer AH, Da Silva DLF, Kang S, Chien AL. Rosacea is associated with chronic systemic diseases in a skin severity–dependent manner: results of a case-control study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73(4):604–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chang ALS, Raber I, Xu J, Li R, Spitale R, Chen J, Kiefer AK, Tian C, Eriksson NK, Hinds DA, Tung JY. Assessment of the genetic basis of rosacea by genome-wide association study. J Investig Dermatol. 2015;135(6):1548–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Silverberg MS, Cho JH, Rioux JD, McGovern DP, Wu J, Annese V, Achkar J-P, Goyette P, Scott R, Xu W, Klei L, Daly MJ, Abraham C, Bayless TM, Bossa F, Griffiths AM, Ippoliti AF, Lahaie RG, Latiano A, Paré P, Proctor DD, Regueiro MD, Steinhart AH, Targan SR, Schumm LP, Kistner EO, Lee AT, Gregersen PK, Rotter JI, Brant SR, Taylor KD, Roeder K, Duerr RH, Barmada MM. Ulcerative colitis–risk loci on chromosomes 1p36 and 12q15 found by genome-wide association study. Nat Genet. 2009;41(2):216.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Weinstock LB, Steinhoff M. Rosacea and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: prevalence and response to rifaximin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;68(5):875–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Egeberg A, Hansen PR, Gislason GH, Thyssen JP. Clustering of autoimmune diseases in patients with rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74(4):667–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Egeberg A, Hansen PR, Gislason GH, Thyssen JP. Exploring the association between rosacea and Parkinson disease: a Danish nationwide cohort study. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73(5):529–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Egeberg A, Ashina M, Gaist D, Gislason GH, Thyssen JP. Prevalence and risk of migraine in patients with rosacea: a population-based cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(3):454–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Spoendlin J, Voegel JJ, Jick SS, Meier CR. Migraine, triptans, and the risk of developing rosacea: a population-based study within the United Kingdom. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69(3):399–406.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gupta MA, Gupta AK, Chen SJ, Johnson AM. Comorbidity of rosacea and depression: an analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and National Hospital Ambulatory Care Survey—outpatient department data collected by the US National Center for Health Statistics from 1995 to 2002. Br J Dermatol. 2005;153(6):1176–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Egeberg A, Hansen PR, Gislason GH, Thyssen JP. Patients with rosacea have increased risk of depression and anxiety disorders: a Danish nationwide cohort study. Dermatology. 2016;232(2):208–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Parodi A, Paolino S, Greco A, Drago F, Mansi C, Rebora A, Parodi A, Savarino V. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in rosacea: clinical effectiveness of its eradication. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6(7):759–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Cheema D, Coomarasamy A, El-Toukhy T. Non-hormonal therapy of post-menopausal vasomotor symptoms: a structured evidence-based review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007;276(5):463–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bachmann GA. Menopausal vasomotor symptoms: a review of causes, effects and evidence-based treatment options. J Reprod Med. 2005;50(3):155–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wilkin JK, Wilkin O, Kapp R, Donachie R, Chernosky ME, Buckner J. Aspirin blocks nicotinic acid–induced flushing. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1982;31(4):478–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Wilkin JK, Fortner G, Reinhardt LA, Flowers OV, Kilpatrick SJ, Streeter WC. Prostaglandins and nicotinate-provoked increase in cutaneous blood flow. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1985;38(3):273–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wilkin JK. Vasodilator rosacea. Arch Dermatol. 1980;116(5):598.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Saleem MD, Wilkin JK. Evaluating and optimizing the diagnosis of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea. Dermatol Clin. 2017;36(2):127–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wilkin JK. Flushing reactions in the cancer chemotherapy patient: the lists are longer but the strategies are the same. Arch Dermatol. 1992;128(10):1387–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Abram K, Silm H, Maaroos HI, Oona M. Risk factors associated with rosacea. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010;24(5):565–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Aldrich N, Gerstenblith M, Fu P, Tuttle MS, Varma P, Gotow E, Cooper KD, Mann M, Popkin DL. Genetic vs environmental factors that correlate with rosacea: a cohort-based survey of twins. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(11):1213–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Yazici AC, Tamer L, Ikizoglu G, Kaya TI, Api H, Yildirim H, Adiguzel A. GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes as possible heritable factors of rosacea. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2006;22(4):208–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Breton AL, Truchetet F, Véran Y, Doumat-Batch F, Baumann C, Barbaud A, Schmutz J-L, Bursztejn AC. Prevalence analysis of smoking in rosacea. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011;25(9):1112–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Curnier A, Choudhary S. Rhinophyma: dispelling the myths. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(2):351–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Vieira ACC, Höfling-Lima AL, Mannis MJ. Ocular rosacea: a review. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2012;75(5):363–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Vieira AC, Mannis MJ. Ocular rosacea: common and commonly missed. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69(6):S36–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Olazagasti J, Lynch P, Fazel N. The great mimickers of rosacea. Cutis. 2014;94(1):39–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Okiyama N, Kohsaka H, Ueda N, Satoh T, Katayama I, Nishioka K, Yokozeki H. Seborrheic area erythema as a common skin manifestation in Japanese patients with dermatomyositis. Dermatology. 2008;217(4):374–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Naleway AL, Greenlee RT, Melski JW. Characteristics of diagnosed polymorphous light eruption. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2006;22(4):205–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Aroni K, Tsagroni E, Kavantzas N, Patsouris E, Ioannidis E. A study of the pathogenesis of rosacea: how angiogenesis and mast cells may participate in a complex multifactorial process. Arch Dermatol Res. 2008;300(3):125–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Ramelet AA, Perroulaz G. Rosacea: histopathologic study of 75 cases. In: Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie, vol. 115(8). Paris: Masson; 1988, p. 801–6.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Aroni K, Tsagroni E, Lazaris AC, Patsouris E, Agapitos E. Rosacea: a clinicopathological approach. Dermatology. 2004;209(3):177–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Powell FC. The histopathology of rosacea: ‘where’s the beef? Dermatology. 2004;209(3):173–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Cribier B. Pathophysiology of rosacea: redness, telangiectasia, and rosacea. In: Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie, vol. 138. Paris: Elsevier Masson; 2011. p. S184–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wilkin, J.K., McGee, J.S. (2020). Introduction to Clinical Rosacea. In: Cary, J.H., Maibach, H.I. (eds) Rosacea. Updates in Clinical Dermatology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52097-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52097-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52096-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52097-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics