Skip to main content

The Models of Structural Mechanics for Geodetic Accuracy Assignment: A Case Study of the Finite Element Method

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Contributions to International Conferences on Engineering Surveying

Abstract

It is well-known that two of the third parts of geodetic works comprise staking-out works and geodetic monitoring. Both of these tasks of applied geodesy as a scientific discipline face with the question of the measurement accuracy assignment. There are many ways how to assign an appropriate accuracy of measurements. However, all of them lack a rigorous approach. There is only one right way that consists of using the structural mechanics’ models for the calculation of probable construction displacements to assign the appropriate accuracy as a part of total construction’s displacements. The measurements’ accuracy is being treated as a function of those displacements. Geodesists have to have special skills in the structures’ design and simulation to find such displacements, which, in turn, is a complicated task. The solution is in using the finite element method (FEM) that allows modeling large structures with straightforward computations. The paper considers the general idea of the FEM and its models with the application to the geodetic accuracy assignment. Based on these models, the general approach for the accuracy assignment was developed and implemented. As a hands-on example, the different structures were analyzed, and its finite element models were constructed. For the case of staking-out works, the problem of high-rise building erection was considered. The FEM simulation allowed us to determine the influence of the structure displacements on the accuracy of staking-out works. The geodetic monitoring problem was studied on the example of underground structures. For this structure, the FEM simulation was carried out. By the simulation results, an appropriate accuracy of monitoring was assigned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barazzetti, L., Banfi, F., Brumana, R., Gusmeroli, G., Oreni, D., Previtali, M., Roncoroni, F., Schiantarelli, G. (2015) BIM from laser clouds and finite element analysis: combining structural analysis and geometric complexity. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. XL-5/W4: 8103–8120. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-W4-345-2015.

  2. Castagnetti, C., Cosentini, R.M., Lancellotta, R., Capra, A. (2017) Geodetic monitoring and geotechnical analyses of subsidence induced settlements of historic structures. Struct Control Health Monit.: 24, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2030.

  3. Crespi, P., Franchi, A., Ronca, P., Giordano, N., Scamardo, M., Gusmeroli, G., Schiantarelli, G. (2016) From BIM to FEM: the analysis of an historical masonry building. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment. 149: 581–592. https://doi.org/10.2495/BIM150471.

  4. Dardanelli, G., Pipitone, C. (2017) Hydraulic models and finite elements for monitoring of an earth dam, by using GNSS techniques. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering. 61(3): 421–433. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.8217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Galgana, G.A., Newman, A.V., Hamburger, M.W., Solidumd, R.U. (2014) Geodetic observations and modeling of time-varying deformation at Taal Volcano, Philippines. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research: 271, 11–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/s141121889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gikas, V., Sakellariou, M. (2008) Horizontal deflection analysis of a large earthen dam by means of geodetic and geotechnical methods. 13th FIG Symposium on Deformation Measurement and Analysis, 4th IAG Symposium on Geodesy for Geotechnical and Structural Engineering, 12–18 May 2008 Lisbon, Portugal, pp 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hesse, C., Heer, R., Horst, S., Neuner, H. (2006) A concept for monitoring wind energy turbines with geodetic techniques. In Proc. 3rd IAG / 12th FIG Symposium, 22–24 May, 2006, Baden, Germany, pp 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hickey, J., Gottsmann, J., Mothes, P., Odbert, H., Prutkin, I., Vajda, P. (2019) The ups and downs of volcanic unrest: insights from integrated geodesy and numerical modelling. Advs in Volcanology: 203–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11157_2017_13.

  9. Jäger, R., González, F. (2005) GNSS/LPS based online control and alarm system (GOCA)—mathematical models and technical realization of a system for natural and geotechnical deformation monitoring and hazard prevention. In Proc. IAG Symposium, 17–19 March, 2005, Jaén, Spain, pp 293–303.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kapović, Z., Novaković, G., Paar, R. (2005) Deformation monitoring of the bridges by conventional and GPS methods. 5th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference - SGEM2005, Albena, Bulgaria, pp 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kontogianni, V.A., Stiros, S.C. (2005) Induced deformation during tunnel excavation: Evidence from geodetic monitoring. Engineering Geology. 79: 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.10.012.

  12. Lee, H.-H. (2015) Finite Element Simulations with ANSYS Workbench 16: Theory, Applications, Case Studies. SDC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li, H.-N., Yi, T.-H., Yi, X.-D., Wang, G.-X. (2007) Measurement and analysis of wind- induced response of tall building based on GPS technology. Advances in Structural Engineering. 10(1): 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, G.R., Quek, S.S. (2003) The Finite Element Method: A Practical Course. Butterworth- Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Logan, D.L. (2012) A First Course in the Finite Element Method. 5th ed. CENGAGE Learning, University of Wisconsin-Platteville.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pantazis, G., Skarlatos, D., Pelecanos, L. (2019) Long-term geodetic monitoring of seasonal deformations of earth dams and relevant finite element verification. In Proc. 4th Joint Inter- national Symposium on Deformation Monitoring (JISDM), 15–17 May 2019, Athens, Greece, pp 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Roberts, G., Meng, X., Meo, M., Dodson, A., Cosser, E., Iuliano, E., Morris, A. (2003) A remote bridge health monitoring system using computational simulation and GPS sensor data. In Proc. 11th FIG Symposium on Deformation Measurements, 2003, Santorini, Greece, pp 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shamshiri, R., Motagh, M., Baes, M., Sharifi, M.A. (2014) Deformation analysis of the Lake Urmia Causeway (LUC) embankments in northwest Iran: insights from multi-sensor interferometry synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) data and finite element modeling (FEM). Journal of Geodesy. 88: 1171–1185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-014-0752-6.

  19. Szostak-Chrzanowski, A., Chrzanowski, A., Massiéra, M., Bazanowski, M., Whitaker, C. (2008) Study of a long-term behavior of large earth dam combining monitoring and finite element analysis results. 13th FIG Symposium on Deformation Measurement and Analysis, 4th IAG Symposium on Geodesy for Geotechnical and Structural Engineering, 12–18 May 2008 Lisbon, Portugal, pp 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Taşçi, L. (2015) Deformation monitoring in steel arch bridges through close-range photogrammetry and the finite element method. Experimental Techniques. 39: 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/ext.12022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsakiri, M., Ioannidis, C., Papanikos, P., Kattis, M. (2004) Load testing measurements for structural assessment using geodetic and photogrammetric techniques. 1st FIG International Symposium on Engineering Surveys for Construction Works and Structural Engineering, 28 June–1 July, 2004, Nottingham, United Kingdom, pp 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Welsch, W.M., Heunecke, O. (2001) Models and terminology for the analysis of geodetic monitoring observations - Official Report of the Ad-Hoc Committee of FIG Working Group6.1. The 10th FIG International Symposium on Deformation Measurements, 19–22 March 2001 Orange, California, USA, pp 390–412.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yalçinkaya, M., Satir, B., Akköse, M. (2006) Determining the displacement occurred in the tunnels using different measurement and finite elements methods: a case study for Trabzon- 2 tunnel, in Turkey. In Proc. 3rd IAG / 12th FIG Symposium, 22–24 May, 2006, Baden, Germany, pp 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yang, H., Xu, X., Neumann, I. (2018) Optimal finite element model with response surface methodology for concrete structures based on terrestrial laser scanning technology. Composite Structures. 183: 2–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roman Shults .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shults, R. (2021). The Models of Structural Mechanics for Geodetic Accuracy Assignment: A Case Study of the Finite Element Method. In: Kopáčik, A., Kyrinovič, P., Erdélyi, J., Paar, R., Marendić, A. (eds) Contributions to International Conferences on Engineering Surveying. Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51953-7_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics