Skip to main content

Volume-Outcome Relationship in Pancreatic Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Volume-Outcome Relationship in Oncological Surgery

Part of the book series: Updates in Surgery ((UPDATESSURG))

  • 236 Accesses

Abstract

In pancreatic surgery the correlation between hospital volume and postoperative outcomes has been widely demonstrated. Hospital volume is a recognized independent determinant for in-hospital mortality, mainly due to a different effectiveness in the management of major postoperative complications. European countries and the United States have been pursuing centralization policies based on minimal annual hospital and surgeon volumes, in order to guarantee the lowest morbidity and mortality rates. In Italy, two models have been proposed as an alternative to centralization and both are founded on the decentralization of expertise to low-volume centers. The most recent evidence drawn from the Italian pancreatic surgery scene have confirmed the volume-outcome relationship and have shown the worrying features of surgery in low-volume hospitals: more non-resective surgery, higher mortality, and excessive costs. Also, a geographical gradient in mortality rates has been demonstrated in Italy: the highest mortality is observed in southern regions and the lowest in northern regions, but patient mobility reduces this difference. A centralization policy, based either on individual hospital outcomes or on a volume criterion, is certainly needed in our country and should pass through the regional accreditation of high-quality surgery hospitals and the homogeneous distribution of referral centers throughout the national territory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Greenblatt DY, Kelly KJ, Rajamanickam V, et al. Preoperative factors predict perioperative morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(8):2126–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Niedergethmann M, Farag Soliman M, Post S. Postoperative complications of pancreatic cancer surgery. Minerva Chir. 2004;59(2):175–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson SR, Tosteson AN, et al. Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery. 1999;125(3):250–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. El Amrani M, Clement G, Lenne X, et al. Failure to rescue in patients undergoing pancreatectomy: is hospital volume a standard of quality improvement programs? Nationwide analysis of 12,333 patients. Ann Surg. 2018;268(5):799–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pecorelli N, Balzano G, Capretti G, et al. Effect of surgeon volume on outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high-volume hospital. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(3):518–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Krautz C, Haase E, Elshafei M, et al. The impact of surgical experience and frequency of practice on perioperative outcomes in pancreatic surgery. BMC Surg. 2019;19(1):108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0577-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Vonlanthen R, Lodge P, Barkun JS, et al. Toward a consensus on centralization in surgery. Ann Surg. 2018;268(5):712–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Milstein A, Galvin RS, Delbanco SF, et al. Improving the safety of health care: the leapfrog initiative. Eff Clin Pract. 2000;3(6):313–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(22):2128–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Polonski A, Izbicki JR, Uzunoglu FG. Centralization of pancreatic surgery in Europe. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23(10):2081–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bassi C, Balzano G, Zerbi A, Ramera M. Pancreatic surgery in Italy. Criteria to identify the hospital units and the tertiary referral centers entitled to perform it. Updat Surg. 2016;68(2):117–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tran TB, Dua MM, Worhunsky DJ, et al. An economic analysis of pancreaticoduodenectomy: should costs drive consumer decisions? Am J Surg. 2016;211(6):991–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahola R, Sand J, Laukkarinen J. Pancreatic resections are not only safest but also most cost-effective when performed in a high-volume centre: A Finnish register study. Pancreatology. 2019;19(5):769–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Capretti G, Balzano G, Gianotti L, et al. Management and outcomes of pancreatic resections performed in high-volume referral and low-volume community hospitals lead by surgeons who shared the same mentor: the importance of training. Dig Surg. 2018;35(1):42–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ravaioli M, Pinna AD, Francioni G, et al. A partnership model between high- and low-volume hospitals to improve results in hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery. Ann Surg. 2014;260(5):871–5; discussion 875–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Balzano G, Zerbi A, Capretti G, et al. Effect of hospital volume on outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy in Italy. Br J Surg. 2008;95(3):357–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Balzano G, Capretti G, Callea G, et al. Overuse of surgery in patients with pancreatic cancer. A nationwide analysis in Italy. HPB (Oxford). 2016;18(5):470–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Farges O, Bendersky N, Truant S, et al. The theory and practice of pancreatic surgery in France. Ann Surg. 2017;266(5):797–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Zerbi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Balzano, G., Bassi, C., Caraceni, G., Falconi, M., Montorsi, M., Zerbi, A. (2021). Volume-Outcome Relationship in Pancreatic Surgery. In: Montorsi, M. (eds) Volume-Outcome Relationship in Oncological Surgery. Updates in Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51806-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51806-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51805-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51806-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics