Skip to main content

The Refugee Crisis and the EU Border Security Policies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of EU Crises

Abstract

This chapter examines the impact of the refugee crisis of 2015–2016 on the border policy developments in the EU. Following the conceptual framework outlined in this Handbook, three theory-driven scenarios were considered: ‘breaking down’, ‘muddling through’, and ‘heading forward’. Given the severity of the crisis which threatened EU flagship integration projects such as Schengen, member states would normally be expected to work towards common policies rather than take unilateral action. Yet, contrary to this assumption, the crisis has not resulted in a supranationalisation of the EU border security regime, but in a mixture of temporary and limited disintegration on the one hand (‘breaking down’), and incremental and marginal reforms of existing policies, on the other hand (‘muddling through’). Member states rejected distributional policies such as the refugee quotas proposed by the Commission, as they feared larger numbers of asylum seekers as well as supranational encroachments on their sovereign prerogatives. Contrastingly, national governments reached rapid agreement on a series of incremental policy reforms, which enabled them to reduce refugee influxes and prevent the disintegration of Schengen/Dublin, while also retaining strong control over the decision-making process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basilien-Gainche, M. (2017). Leave and Let Die: The EU Banopticon Approach to Migrants at Sea. In V. Moreno-Lax & E. Papastavridis (Eds.), ‘Boat Refugees’ and Migrants at Sea: A Comprehensive Approach. Integrating Maritime Security with Human Rights (pp. 327–350). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC. (2015, April 20). Mediterranean Migrant Deaths: EU Faces Renewed Pressure.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, D. (2016). A Stronger, More Supranational Union. In H. Zimmermann & A. Dür (Eds.), Key Controversies in European Integration (pp. 48–54). 2nd edition, London, New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F., Guérin, N., Jagdhuber, S., Rittberger, B., & Weiss, M. (2017). Political (Non)-Reform in the Euro Crisis And The Refugee Crisis: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Explanation. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(2), 246–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boin, A., Hart, P., Stern, E., & Sundelius, B. (2005). The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership Under Pressure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borrás, S., & Radaelli, C. M. (2011). The Politics of Governance Architectures: Creation, Change and Effects of the EU Lisbon Strategy. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(4), 463–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. (2016). From EU Governance of Crisis to Crisis of EU Governance: Regulatory Failure, Redistributive Conflict and Eurosceptic Publics. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(S1), 8–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairney, P., & Zahariadis, N. (2016). Multiple Streams Approach: A Flexible Metaphor Presents an Opportunity to Operationalize Agenda Setting Processes. In N. Zahariadis (Ed.), Handbook of Public Policy Agenda Setting (pp. 87–106). Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Capoccia, G., & Kelemen, R. (2007). The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism. World Politics, 59(3), 341–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrera, S., & den Hertog, L. (2016, March). A European Border and Coast Guard: What`s in a Name? CEPS Paper in Liberty and Security in Europe No. 88. Brussels: CEPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccorulli, M. (2019). Back to Schengen: The Collective Securitization of the EU Free-Border Area. West European Politics, 42(2), 302–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A Garbage can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collett, E., & Ahad, A. (2017). EU Migration Partnerships: A Work in Progress. Transatlantic Council on Migration and Migration Policy Institute. Available at https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/eu-migration-partnerships-work-progress. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  • Council of the EU (2015a). Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/972 of 22 June 2015 Launching the European Union Military Operation in the Southern Central Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED), OJ 157/51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council. (2015b). European Council Meeting (17 and 18 December 2015): Conclusions. EUCO 28/15, 18 December, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council. (2016a). EU-Turkey Statement. Press release 144/16, 18 March. Available at https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2016/03/18/eu-turkey-statement/. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  • Council. (2016b). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Border and Coast Guard and Repealing Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004, Regulation (EC) No 863/2007 and Council Decision 2005/267/EC-Mandate for negotiations with the European Parliament. 7649/16, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daley, S. (2015, November 15). Nordic Countries, Overwhelmed by Migrants, Retreat from Generous Traditions. The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Hertog, L. (2016, May). EU Budgetary Responses to the ‘Refugee Crisis’: Reconfiguring the Funding Landscape (CEPS Paper No. 93). Brussels: CEPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • EEAS. (2018). Strategic Review on EUNAVFOR MED Op Sophia, EUBAM Libya & EU Liaison and Planning Cell. Working document of the EEAS, EEAS(2018) 835.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2015a). Communication: A European Agenda on Migration. COM(2015)240 final, 13 May, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2015b). Standard Eurobarometer 83 Spring 2015: European Citizenship. 31 July 2015, Brussels. Available at https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-5451_en.htm. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  • European Commission. (2015c). Communication on a European Border and Coast Guard and Effective Management of Europe`s External Borders. COM(2015) 673 final, 15 December, Strasbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2015d). A European Border and Coast Guard to protect Europe`s External Borders. Press release IP/15/6327, 15 December, Strasbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2015e). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Border and Coast Guard. COM(2015)671 final, 15 December, Strasbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2016a). Communication: Final Report on Relocation and Resettlement. COM(2016)165 final, 16 March, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2016b). Communication on Establishing a New Partnership Framework with Third Countries Under the European Agenda on Migration. COM(2016)385, 7 June, Strasbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2016c, October 20). European Council 20–21 October 2016: European Border and Coast Guard—from Policy Decision to Operational Implementation. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/commission/publications/european-council-20-21-october-2016-european-border-and-coast-guard-policy-decision_ro. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  • European Commission. (2016d). Securing Europe`s External Borders: Launch of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency. Press release IP/16/3281, 6 October. Available at https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-16-3281_en.htm. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  • Ferguson, Y. H. (2015). Diversity in IR Theory: Pluralism as an Opportunity for Understanding Global Politics. International Studies Perspectives, 16(1), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, M. (2018). Frontex and Human Rights: Responsibility in ‘Multi-Actor Situations’ Under the ECHR and EU Public Liability Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genschel, P., & Jachtenfuchs, M. (2018). From Market Integration to Core State Powers: The Eurozone Crisis, the Refugee Crisis and Integration Theory. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(1), 178–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grün, G. C. (2018, November 28). How The EU`s Resettlement Plan is Failing to Meet Its Goal. DW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2019). Grand Theories of European Integration in the Twenty-First Century. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(8), 1113–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House of Lords. (2017). Operation Sophia: A Failed Mission. 2nd Report, Session 2017–19, HL Paper 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOM. (2015, December 22). Irregular Migrant, Refugee Arrivals in Europe Top One Million in 2015: IOM.. Available at https://www.iom.int/news/irregular-migrant-refugee-arrivals-europe-top-one-million-2015-iom. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  • Jones, E., Kelemen, D., & Meunier, S. (2016, July 5). Is Europe failing, or Is it “failing forward”? The Washington Post.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juncker, J. C. (2015). State of the Union 2015: Time for Honesty, Unity and Solidarity. Strasbourg, 9 September. Available at: https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-15-5614_en.htm. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  • Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavenex, S. (1999). Safe Third Countries: Extending the EU Asylum and Immigration Policies to Central and Eastern Europe. Budapest: CEU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leruth, B., Gänzle, S., & Trondal, J. (2019). Exploring Differentiated Disintegration in a Post-Brexit European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(5), 1013–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynggaards, K., Manners, I., & Lofgren, K. (2015). Research Methods in European Union Studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. (2002). Legacies of Liberalism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power (pp. 1–27). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monar, J. (2006). The Project of a European Border Guard: Origins, Models and Prospects in the Context of the EU`s Integrated External Border Management. In M. Caparini & O. Marenin (Eds.), Borders and Security Governance: Managing Borders in a Globalised World (pp. 193–208). Geneva: DCAF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (1998). The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2019). Liberal Intergovernmentalism. In A. Wiener, T. Börzel, & T. Risse (Eds.), European Integration Theory (pp. 64–84). 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Lax, V. (2018). The EU Humanitarian Border and the Securitization of Human Rights: The “Rescue-Through-Interdiction/Rescue-Without-Protection” Paradigm. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(1), 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newsome, A. (2018). Credible Champions? Transatlantic Relations and Human Rights in Refugee Crises. Journal of European Integration, 40(5), 587–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemann, A., & Speyer, J. (2018). A Neofunctionalist Perspective on the European Refugee Crisis: the Case of the European Border and Coast Guard. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(1), 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemann, A., & Zaun, N. (2018). EU Refugee Policies and Politics in Times of Crisis: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, P., & Kurowska, X. (2012). The Fog on the Border: The Fragmentation of the European Union`s Border Policies. In C. Kaunert, S., S. Léonard, & P. Pawlak (Eds.), European Homeland Security. A European strategy in the making? (pp. 126–144). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Riddervold, M. (2018). A Humanitarian Mission in Line with Human Rights? Assessing Sophia, the EU’s Naval Response to the Migration Crisis. European Security, 27(2), 158–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, B. (2019). The Migration Crisis and the European Union Border Regime. In M. Cremona & J. Scott (Eds.), EU Law Beyond EU Borders: The Extraterritorial Reach of EU Law (pp. 197–228). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saurugger, S. (2014). Theoretical Approaches to European Integration. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2018). Liberal Intergovernmentalism and the Crises of the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(7), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scipioni, M. (2017). De Novo Bodies and EU Integration: What is the Story Behind EU Agencies` Expansion? Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(4), 768–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scipioni, M. (2018). Failing Forward in EU Migration Policy? EU Integration After the 2015 Asylum and Migration Crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(9), 1357–1375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tardy, T. (2015, September). Operation Sophia: Tackling the Refugee Crisis with Military Means, EUISS Brief Issue No. 30. Available at https://www.iss.europa.eu/content/operation-sophia-tackling-refugee-crisis-military-means. Accessed 4 October 2020.

  • Trauner, F. (2016). Asylum Policy: The EU’s ‘Crises’ and the Looming Policy Regime Failure. Journal of European Integration, 38(3), 311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsipras, A. (2015, April 23). Main Points of the Prime Minister’s, Alexis Tsipras. Intervention at the EU Special Summit on Migration. Available at http://primeminister.gr/english/2015/04/24/main-points-of-the-prime-ministers-alexis-tsipras-intervention-at-the-eu-special-summit-on-migration/. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  • UNHCR. (2015, July 3). The Sea Route to Europe: The Mediterranean Passage in the Age of Refugees. Available at http://www.unhcr.org/5592bd059.html. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  • Verdun, A. (2015). A Historical Institutionalist Explanation of the EU’s Responses to the Euro Area Financial Crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(2), 219–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, D. (2017). Can the EU survive? In D. Dinan, N. Nugent, & W. E. Paterson (Eds.), The European Union in Crisis (pp. 336–359). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. M., & Baláž, V. (2012). Migration, Risk, and Uncertainty: Theoretical Perspectives. Population, Space and Place, 18(2), 167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahariadis, N. (2003). Ambiguity and Choice in Public Policy: Political Decision Making in Modern Democracies. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahariadis, N. (2008). Ambiguity and Choice in European Public Policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(4), 514–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaun, N. (2018). States as Gatekeepers in EU Asylum Politics: Explaining the Non-Adoption of a Refugee Quota System. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(1), 44–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bosilca, RL. (2021). The Refugee Crisis and the EU Border Security Policies. In: Riddervold, M., Trondal, J., Newsome, A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of EU Crises. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51791-5_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics