Skip to main content

The Euro in a Triple Crisis Context and Its Impact on the European Union

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of EU Crises

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics ((PSEUP))

Abstract

This chapter examines the Eurozone crisis and the ways its interaction with the refugee crisis and Brexit impacted the European Union. After briefly describing each crisis, I turn to the intersections among these crises and the role of institutions in solving them. While institutions often help, they are not panaceas. Existing scholarship on the EU often implies that substantial improvements in welfare are just around the corner if only we “get our institutions right.” Focusing on the dynamic context of multiple crises underscores the ways in which differential integration is taking place in the EU. I argue that the Eurozone crisis presents the most opportunity for “heading forward” among member states, whereas both the refugee crisis and Brexit constitute failures to devise institutional solutions to the challenges facing the EU.

Revised and reprinted version of an original article: Caporaso (2018).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Admittedly, other interpretations are plausible, including one in which Orban sees German generosity as relieving pressure on Hungary to accept more refugees.

  2. 2.

    This is hotly contested in several countries not least of which is Germany.

References

  • Barnett, M. N., & Finnemore, M. (1999). The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations. International Organization, 53(4), 699–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betts, A. (2015). The Normative Terrain of the Global Refugee Regime. Ethics and International Affairs, 29(4), 363–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betts, A., & Collier, P. (2017). Refuge: Rethinking Refugee Policy in a Changing World. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boerzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2018). From the Euro to the Schengen Crises: European Integration Theories, Politicization, and Identity Politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 83–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordignon, M., & Moriconi, S. (2017). The Case for a Common European Refugee Policy. Bruegel Policy Contribution Issue 8. Bruegel, Brussels, Belgium, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnermeier, M. K., James, H., & Landau, J. P. (2016). The Euro and the Battle of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bully, D. (2017). Shame on EU? Europe, RtoP, and the Politics of Refugee Protection. Ethics and International Affairs, 31(1), 51–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caporaso, J. A. (2018). Europe’s Triple Crisis and the Uneven Role of Institutions: The Euro, Refugees and Brexit. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(6), 1345–1361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeGrauwe, P. (2011). Only a More Active ECB Can Solve the Euro Crisis. No. 250, August. Brussels, Belgium. Center for European Policy Studies, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGrauwe, P., & Ji, Y. (2013). Self-Fulfilling Crises in the Eurozone: An Empirical Test. Journal of International Money and Finance, 34, 15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economist. (2016, February 18). Taking Europe’s Pulse. Economist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabbrini, S. (2015). Which European Union?. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giglioli, I. (2016). Migration, Austerity, and Crisis at the Periphery of Europe. Othering and Belonging, Issue One, Summer. http://www.otheringandbelonging.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/OtheringAndBelonging_Issue1.pdf.

  • Heipertz, M., & Verdun, A. (2010). Ruling Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henning, R. C. (2017). Tangled Governance: International Regime Complexity, the Troika, and the Euro Crisis. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hollifield, J. F. (2016). The Refugee ‘Crisis’ in Europe and the Policy Responses. Policy Brief, 1–3. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, P., & Kollanyi, B. (2016). Bots, #Strongerin, and #Brexit. Comprop Research Note, 2016, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunyadi, B., & Molnar, C. (2016). Central Europe’s Faceless Strangers: The Rise of Xenophobia. Washington, DC: Freedom House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, W. (2017). Surplus Germany (Paper Series No. 8, 1–32). Washington, DC. Transatlantic Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jupille, J., & Caporaso, J. A. (2009). Domesticating Discourses: European Law, English Judges, and Political Institutions. European Political Science Review, 1(2), 205–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O. (1989). International Institutions and State Power. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindleberger, C., & Aliber, R. (2005). Manias, Panics, and Crashes. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (1992). Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, C., & Cram, L. (2016). Analyzing Opinion on UK-EU Referendum on Twitter. Proceedings of the Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthijs, M. (2017, January/February). Europe After Brexit. Foreign Affairs, 96(1), 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthijs, M., & McNamara, K. (2015). The Euro Crisis’ Theory Effects: Northern Saints, Southern Sinners, and the Demise of the Eurobond. Journal of European Integration, 37(2), 229–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride, J. (2017). What Brexit Means. Council on Foreign Relations. Available at: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/what-brexit-means. Accessed 21 August 2017.

  • Merler, S., & Pisani-Ferry, J. (2012). Sudden Stops in the Euro Area (pp. 1–16). Brussels, Belgium, Bruegel: Bruegel Policy Contribution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 85(2), 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miliband, D. (2016, October 13). The Best Way to Deal with the Refugee Crisis. New York Review of Books, 63(15).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (2003). Liberal International Relations Theory: A Scientific Assessment. In C. Elman & M. F. Elman (Eds.), Progress in International Relations Theory (pp. 159–204). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (2010). Liberal Theories of International Relations: A Primer, 1–15. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (2015, postscript 2016). Europe Entrapped. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M., Jr. (1996). Big Bills Left on the Sidewalk: Why Some Nations are Rich and Others Poor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(2), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porcaro, G., & Mueller, H. (2016). Tweeting Brexit: Narrative Building and Sentiment Analysis. Bruegel, Brussels, Blog Post. http://bruegel.org/2016/11/tweeting-brexit-narrative-building-and-sentiment-analysis/.

  • Rachman, G. (2016, January 25). Greek Debt Is the Key to Refugee Crisis. Financial Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (1993). Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution. In J. G. Ruggie (Ed.), Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form (pp. 3–47). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedelmeier, U. (2017). Political Safeguards Against Democratic Backsliding in the EU: The Limits of Material Sanctions and the Scope of Social Pressure. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(3), 337–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, C. A. (2012). Gaps in the Institutional Structure of the Euro Area. Banque de France. Financial Stability Review, 16(April), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James A. Caporaso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Caporaso, J.A. (2021). The Euro in a Triple Crisis Context and Its Impact on the European Union. In: Riddervold, M., Trondal, J., Newsome, A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of EU Crises. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51791-5_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics