Skip to main content

Failing Forward in Financial Stability Regulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of EU Crises

Abstract

This chapter asks three questions: To what degree has the European financial and debt crises spurred new policies and purposeful action toward improved financial stability regulation? Secondly, how can we theorize the processes that link crises and policy? And thirdly, we ask if what has been achieved is likely to be sufficient to avoid another crisis? We measure policy change along three dimensions: level of aggregation, level of governance, and functional scope, and find significant change along the two first. This is explained by the “failing forward plus learning” framework that we develop. We do, however, find enough chinks in the EUs newly erected armour to predict that processes of failing forward will continue. Thus, we conclude that muddling through best describes the EU’s post-crisis efforts in financial stability regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The American AIG had only about 40% domestic business in 2008 when they nearly failed (ibid.: 31). If the US government bailed out AIG, only 40% of the benefit would go to them. It was only saved because the Americans perceived the benefits for them to be large enough.

  2. 2.

    The last conflict is not relevant for the three dimensions. However, non-Eurozone countries were allowed to opt in (Howarth and Quaglia 2013: 114–115).

References

  • Baker, A. (2013a). The Gradual Transformation? The Incremental Dynamics of Macroprudential Regulation. Regulation & Governance, 7(4), 417–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A. (2013b). The New Political Economy of the Macroprudential Ideational Shift. New Political Economy, 18(1), 112–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A. (2018). Macroprudential Regimes and the Politics of Social Purpose. Review of International Political Economy, 25(3), 293–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borio, C. (2009). Implementing the Macroprudential Approach to Financial Regulation and Supervision. Financial Stability Review [Bank of France], 13, 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, J., & Howarth, D. (2010). Internal Market: Gesture Politics? Explaining the EU’s Response to the Financial Crisis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(1), 119–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caravelis, G. (2010). The EU Financial Supervision in the Aftermath of the 2008 Crisis: An Appraisal (EUI Working Papers No. 2010/11). Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. San domenico di Fiesole.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, J., Oosterloo, S., & Schoenmaker, D. (2009). European Financial Markets and Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Larosière, J., Balcerowicz, L., Issing, O., Masera, R., McCarthy, C., Nyberg, L., et al. (2009). Report of the High-Level Group on Financial Supervision in the EU. Brussels: DG Internal Market and and DG Economic and Financial Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, C. (2009). The Systemic Risk Board. Eurointelligence: A Return to the EMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECB. (2018). List of Supervised Entities. https://www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/ecb/pub/pdf/ssm.list_of_supervised_entities_201812.en.pdf. Accessed 22 June 2019.

  • ECB. (2019). Single Supervisory Mechanism. https://www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/about/thessm/html/index.en.html. Accessed 10 Aug 2019.

  • Epstein, R. A., & Rhodes, M. (2016). The Political Dynamics Behind Europe’s New Banking Union. West European Politics, 39(3), 415–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESRB. (2019). A Review of Macroprudential Policy in the EU in 2018. Frankfurt am Main: ESRB.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2009). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community Macro Prudential Oversight of the Financial System and Establishing a European Systemic Risk Board (COM(2009) 499 final). Brussels: EUR-Lex.

    Google Scholar 

  • FSB, IMF, & BIS. (2011). Macroprudential Policy Tools and Frameworks: Progress Report to G20. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/external/np/g20/pdf/102711.pdf.

  • Gros, D. (2013). Banking Union with a Sovereign Virus. Intereconomics, 48(2), 93–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy, A. (2014). Redesigning Financial Supervision in the European Union (2009–2013). Journal of European Public Policy, 21(2), 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjertaker, I., & Tranøy, B. S. (2017). Ustabilitetens politiske økonomi: Om fremveksten av finansialisert kapitalisme. Oslo: Cappelen Damm akademisk.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Lords. (2009). The Future of EU Financial Regulation and Supervision (HL Paper 106-II). London: Authority of the House of Lords.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, D., & Quaglia, L. (2013). Banking Union as Holy Grail: Rebuilding the Single Market in Financial Services, Stabilizing Europe’s Banks and ‘Completing’ Economic and Monetary Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(S1), 103–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, D., & Quaglia, L. (2014). The Steep Road to European Banking Union: Constructing the Single Resolution Mechanism. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(S1), 125–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, D., & Quaglia, L. (2015). The New Intergovernmentalism in Financial Regulation and Banking Union. In C. Bickerton, D. Hodson, & U. Puetter (Eds.), The New Intergovernmentalism: States and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era (pp. 146–162). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jabko, N. (2012). International Radicalism, Domestic Conformism: France’s Ambiguous Stance on Financial Reforms. In R. Mayntz (Ed.), Crisis and Control: Institutional Change in Financial Market Regulation (pp. 97–118). Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. (2015). The Forgotten Financial Union: How You Can Have a Euro Crisis Without a Euro. In M. Matthijs & M. Blyth (Eds.), The Future of the Euro (pp. 44–69). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E., Kelemen, R. D., & Meunier, S. (2015). Failing Forward? The Euro Crisis and the Incomplete Nature of European Integration. Comparative Political Studies, 49(7), 1010–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kranke, M., & Yarrow, D. (2018). The Global Governance of Systemic Risk: How Measurement Practices Tame Macroprudential Politics. New Political Economy, 24, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menéndez, A. J. (2009). When the Market Is Political: The Socio-Economic Constitution of the European Union Between Market-Making and Polity-Making. In R. Letelier & A. J. Menéndez (Eds.), The Sinews of European Peace: Reconstituting the Democratic Legitimacy of the Socio-Economic Constitution of the European Union (pp. 39–62). Oslo: ARENA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menéndez, A. J. (2016). The Refugee Crisis: Between Human Tragedy and Symptom of the Structural Crisis of European Integration. European Law Journal, 22(4), 388–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, H. P. (2015 [1982]). Can “It” Happen Again? Essays on Instability and Finance. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, T. G. (2014). Shadow Banking: Policy Challenges for Central Banks (Levy Economics Institute Working Paper, 802), pp. 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (1993). Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(4), 473–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • OJ EU. (2010). Regulation (EU) No 1092/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on European Union Macro-Prudential Oversight of the Financial System and Establishing a European Systemic Risk Board, L 331/1 C.F.R.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quaglia, L. (2010). Governing Financial Services in the European Union: Banking, Securities and Post-Trading (Vol. 12). London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quaglia, L. (2013). Is European Union Governance Ready to Deal with the Next Financial Crisis? In H. K. Anheier (Ed.), Governance Challenges and Innovations: Financial and Fiscal Governance. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rixen, T. (2013). Why Reregulation After the Crisis Is Feeble: Shadow Banking, Offshore Financial Centers, and Jurisdictional Competition. Regulation & Governance, 7(4), 435–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1996). Democratic Policy in Europe. European Law Journal, 2(2), 136–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (2002). The European Social Model: Coping with the Challenges of Diversity. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), 645–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenmaker, D. (2008). The Trilemma of Financial Stability. Paper Presented at the CFS-IMF Conference, A Financial Stability Framework for Europe: Managing Financial Soundness in an Integrating Market, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenmaker, D. (2013). Governance of International Banking: The Financial Trilemma. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spendzharova, A. (2012). Is More ‘Brussels’ the Solution? New European Union Member States’ Preferences About the European Financial Architecture. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(2), 315–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenstad, E. T. (2017). Failing Forward Towards Reduced Instability? Integration and Aggregation in EU Financial Regulation. ARENA Report 4/17. Oslo: ARENA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, P. (2011, February 18). Discussion of Lord Turner’s Lecture,“Reforming Finance: Are We Being Radical Enough?” [Keynote Speech]. Clare Distinguished Lecture in Economics. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A. (2010). The Crisis, Conventional Economic Wisdom, and Public Policy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(5), 1317–1329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stenstad, E.T., Tranøy, B.S. (2021). Failing Forward in Financial Stability Regulation. In: Riddervold, M., Trondal, J., Newsome, A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of EU Crises. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51791-5_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics