Skip to main content

Participant Observation: The Personal Commitment in Native Life—A Problematic Methodological Topos

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethnography

Abstract

While it is well known that fieldwork started long before Malinowski, it is equally well known that the ethnographic method based on participant observation has been, since the 1920s, taken as a foundation for anthropological research and for the scientific status of the knowledge acquired by its means. This essay has several purposes: highlighting some issues related to Malinowski’s theory and practice of research, which are full of implications not always grasped in their theoretical and methodological complexity; recalling some criticisms that have been put forward in the anthropological debate toward the notion of reflexive observation; discussing some uses and abuses of ethnographic practice in disciplinary domains other than anthropology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam, J.-M. (2002). Aspetti del racconto in antropologia. In J.-M. Adam, M.-J. Borel, C. Calame, & M. Kilani (Eds.), Il discorso antropologico. Descrizione, narrazione, sapere (pp. 265–294). Palermo: Sellerio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alliegro, E. V. (2011). Antropologia italiana. Storia e storiografia 1869–1975. Florence: SEID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsterdamski, S. (1981). Scienza. In Enciclopedia (Vol. 12, pp. 531–599). Turin: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianco, C. (1988). Dall’evento al documento. Rome: CISU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le sens pratique. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cirese, A. M. (1979). Cultura egemonica e culture subalterne. Palermo: Palumbo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemente, P. (2013). Le parole degli altri. Gli antropologi e le storie di vita. Pisa: Pacini.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J. (1988a). On Ethnographic Authority. In J. Clifford, The Predicament of Culture. Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art (pp. 21–54). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J. (1988b). On Ethnographic Self-Fashioning: Conrad and Malinowski. In J. Clifford, The Predicament of Culture. Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art (pp. 92–114). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copans, J. (1999). L’enquête ethnologique de terrain. Paris: Nathan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuturi, F. (2013). Parole. In C. Pennacini (Ed.), La ricerca sul campo in antropologia. Oggetti e metodi (pp. 125–186). Rome: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Agostino, G. (2016). Sottotraccia. Percorsi tra antropologia e contemporaneità. Acireale: Bonanno Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Agostino, G. (2020). Postfazione. La museografia etnoantropologica in Italia e i processi di patrimonializzazione. In R. Harrison, Il patrimonio culturale. Un approccio critico (pp. 211–249). Italian edition by L. Rimoldi, V. Matera. Milan: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dal Lago, A., & De Biasi, R. (Eds.). (2004). Un certo sguardo. Introduzione all’etnografia sociale. Bari-Rome: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dei, F. (2009). Cultura popolare. Antropologia museale,22, 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dei, F. (2012). L’antropologia italiana e il destino della lettera D. L’Uomo. Società Tradizione Sviluppo,1–2, 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranti, A. (1992). Etnografia del parlare quotidiano. Rome: La Nuova Italia Scientifica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa, anno I, numero 1, aprile 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabietti, U. (1999/20012). Antropologia culturale. L’esperienza e l’interpretazione. Bari-Rome: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabietti, U., & Matera, V. (1997). Etnografia. Scritture e rappresentazioni dell’antropologia. Rome: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faeta, F. (2005). Questioni italiane. Demologia, antropologia, critica culturale. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faeta, F. (2011). Le ragioni dello sguardo. Poetiche dell’osservazione, della rappresentazione e della memoria. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972). L’ordine del discorso. It. trans., Turin: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallini, C. (Ed.). (1986). Ernesto de Martino: la ricerca, i suoi percorsi. Special issue La ricerca folklorica, XIII, 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannerz, U. (1980). Exploring the City. Inquiries Toward an Urban Anthropology. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hannerz, U. (2010). Anthropology’s World: Life in a Twenty-First-Century Discipline. London: Pluto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. (2013). Heritage: Critical Approaches. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, W. (1999). Lo sfondo filosofico della fisica moderna. Italian trans. by G. Gembillo & E. A. Giannetto. Palermo: Sellerio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2008). Anthropology Is Not Ethnography. Proceedings of British Academy,154, 69–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2014). That’s Enough About Ethnography! Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 383–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2017). In Human Correspondence. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, n.s. 23, 9–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lares, special issue “La demologia come ‘scienza normale’? Ripensare Cultura egemonica e culture subalterne”, anno LXXXI, nn. 2–3, maggiodicembre 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • L’Uomo. Società Tradizione Sviluppo, special issue “La ricerca sul terreno”, vol. IV, n. 2, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malighetti, R., & Molinaro, A. (2016). Il metodo e l’antropologia. Il contributo di una scienza inquieta. Milan: Raffaello Cortina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of Western Pacific. With a Preface by Sir James, George Frazer. London: George Routledge & Sons and New York: E. P. Dutton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (1944/1962). A Scientific Theory of Culture and Other Essays. With a Preface by Huntington Cairns. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (1967). A Diary in the Strict Sense of the Term. London: RKP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matera, V. (1996). Raccontare gli Altri. Lo sguardo e la scrittura nei libri di viaggio e nella letteratura etnografica. Lecce: Argo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivier de Sardan, J.-P. (1995). La politique du terrain. Sur la production des données en anthropologie. Enquête,1, 71–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palumbo, B. (2018). Lo strabismo della DEA. Antropologia, accademia e società in Italia. Palermo: Edizioni Museo Pasqualino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, R. E. (1925/1967). The City: Suggestions for the Investigation of Human Behavior in the Urban Environment. In R. E. Park, E. W. Burgess, & R. D. McKenzie, The City (pp. 1–46). With an Introduction by M. Janowitz. Chicago: The University Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, B. D. (1953). Interview Techniques and Field Relations. In A. L. Kroeber (Ed.), Anthropology Today (pp. 430–451). Chicago: The University Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavanello, M. (2010). Fare antropologia. Bologna: Zanichelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations. The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remotti, F. (2012). Antropologia: un miraggio o un impegno? In L’Uomo. Società Tradizione Sviluppo,1–2, 51–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remotti, F. (2014). Per un’antropologia inattuale. Milan: Elèuthera.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remotti, F. (2019). Somiglianze. Una via per la convivenza. Bari-Rome: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Signorelli, A. (2015). Ernesto de Martino. Teoria antropologica e metodologia della ricerca. Rome: L’Asino d’oro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Signorelli, A., & Sanga G. (Eds.). (2013, aprileottobre). Ernesto de Martino: etnografia e storia. Special issue La ricerca folklorica, 67–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, S. (2005). The United States. In F. Barth, A. Gingrich, R. Parkin, & S. Silverman (Eds.), One Discipline, Four Ways: British, German, French and American Anthropology (pp. 257–348). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocking, G. W., Jr. (1982). Afterward: A View from the Center. Ethnos,47(1–2), 172–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stocking, G. W., Jr. (1983). The Ethnographer’s Magic. Fieldwork in British Anthropology from Tylor to Malinowski. In G. W. Stocking (Ed.), Observers Observed, History of Anthropology I (pp. 70–120). Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedlock, B. (1991). From Participant Observation to the Observation of Participation. The Emergence of Narrative Ethnography. Journal of Anthropological Research,47, 69–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wax, M. L. (1972, February). Tenting with Malinowski. American Sociological Review, 37, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, A. (1992). Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriella D’Agostino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

D’Agostino, G. (2021). Participant Observation: The Personal Commitment in Native Life—A Problematic Methodological Topos. In: Matera, V., Biscaldi, A. (eds) Ethnography. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51720-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51720-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51719-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51720-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics