Skip to main content

Acclimation and Treatability Studies on Slaugter House Wastewater by Hybrid UASB Reactor

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Climate Impacts on Water Resources in India

Part of the book series: Water Science and Technology Library ((WSTL,volume 95))

Abstract

The slaughterhouse wastewater (SWW) is highly influenced by carbonaceous and nitrogenous organic matter aside from significant quantity of dissolved inorganics. There are different streams of SWW, composite of which is exceptionally perfect for secondary biological treatment. The amount of biodegradable organic substances present in the slaughterhouse stream recommends that the anaerobic treatment process could be actualized as the best decision. In this study, the biological treatment of SWW was observed using the Hybrid Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactor (HUASBR) at a laboratory scale setup under continuous mode operation. In this study the reactor was subjected to various Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) loading rates in the range of (2.95–37.98) Kg COD/m3/d under the Hydraulic Retention Times (HRT) between 24 and 6 h. The outcome of the HUASB Reactor shows that maximum COD removal efficiency of 94% can be achieved at the OLR of 18.29 kg COD/m3/d under 10 h HRT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antwi P, Li J, Boadi PO, Meng J, Quashie FK, Wang X, Ren N, Buelna G (2017) Efficiency of an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor treating potato starch processing wastewater and related process kinetics, functional microbial community and sludge morphology. Biores Technol 239:105–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, American Public Health Association (APHA): Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazrafshan E, Mostafapour FK, Farzadkia M, Ownagh KA, Mahvi AH (2012) Slaughterhouse wastewater treatment by combined chemical coagulation and electrocoagulation process. PLoS ONE 7:e40108

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bustillo-Lecompte C, Mehrvar M (2017) Slaughterhouse wastewater: treatment, management and resource recovery. In: Physico-chemical wastewater treatment and resource recovery, InTech

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder A, Mahlberg B (2018) Size, subsidies and technical efficiency in renewable energy production: the case of Austrian biogas plants. Energy J 39

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Mashad HM, Zhang R (2010) Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste. Biores Technol 101:4021–4028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flugaur NJ (2003) Wastewater effluent treatments and control technologies in the beef processing industry, University of Wisconsin–Stout

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns M (1995) Developments in wastewater treatment in the meat processing industry: a review. Biores Technol 54:203–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lenz M, Enright AM, O’Flaherty V, van Aelst AC, Lens PN (2009) Bioaugmentation of UASB reactors with immobilized Sulfurospirillum barnesii for simultaneous selenate and nitrate removal. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 83:377–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loganath R, Mazumder D (2018a) Determination of kinetic co-efficients of anaerobic treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater. J Indian Chem Soc 95:467–473

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loganath R, Mazumder D (2018b) Performance study of hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor treating slaughterhouse wastewater. J Indian Chem Soc 95:365–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Loganath R, Mazumder D (2018c) Performance study on organic carbon, total nitrogen, suspended solids removal and biogas production in hybrid UASB reactor treating real slaughterhouse wastewater. J Environ Chem Eng 6:3474–3484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loganath R, Mazumder D (2020a) Development of a simplified mathematical model for anaerobic digestion. In: Sustainable waste management: policies and case studies 2020, Springer, Singapore, pp 571–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Loganath R, Mazumder D (2020b) Performance study on enlarged‐clarifier hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor for treating the slaughterhouse wastewater. Water Environ J

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedroza M, Souza J, Vieira G, Bezerra M (2017) Bio-oil and biogas from the pyrolysis of sewage sludge, and non-isothermal degradation on Usy Zeolite. Brazilian J Petrol Gas 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan D, Sukla LB, Sawyer M, Rahman PK (2017) Recent bioreduction of hexavalent chromium in wastewater treatment: a review. J Ind Eng Chem 55:1–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajakumar R, Meenambal T (2008) Comparative study on start-up performance of HUASB and AF reactors treating poultry slaughterhouse wastewater. Int J Environ Res 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajakumar R, Meenambal T, Banu JR, Yeom I (2011) Treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater in upflow anaerobic filter under low upflow velocity. Int J Environ Sci Technol 8:149–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajakumar R, Meenambal T, Saravanan P, Ananthanarayanan P (2012) Treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater in hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor packed with pleated poly vinyl chloride rings. Biores Technol 103:116–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajeshwari K, Balakrishnan M, Kansal A, Lata K, Kishore V (2000) State-of-the-art of anaerobic digestion technology for industrial wastewater treatment. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 4:135–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ravindranath E, Kalyanaraman C, Begum SS, Gopalakrishnan AN (2010) Effect of recirculation rate on anaerobic treatment of fleshing using UASB reactor with recovery of energy

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaider LA, Rodgers KM, Rudel RA (2017) Review of organic wastewater compound concentrations and removal in onsite wastewater treatment systems. Environ Sci Technol 51:7304–7317

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schroyen M, Van Hulle SW, Holemans S, Vervaeren H, Raes K (2017) Laccase enzyme detoxifies hydrolysates and improves biogas production from hemp straw and miscanthus. Biores Technol 244:597–604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Speece RE (1996) Anaerobic biotechnology for industrial wastewaters. In: Anaerobic biotechnology for industrial wastewaters

    Google Scholar 

  • Torkian A, Eqbali A, Hashemian S (2003) The effect of organic loading rate on the performance of UASB reactor treating slaughterhouse effluent. Resour Conserv Recycl 40:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsapekos P, Kougias P, Treu L, Campanaro S, Angelidaki I (2017) Process performance and comparative metagenomic analysis during co-digestion of manure and lignocellulosic biomass for biogas production. Appl Energy 185:126–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ün ÜT, Koparal AS, Öğütveren ÜB (2009) Hybrid processes for the treatment of cattle-slaughterhouse wastewater using aluminum and iron electrodes. J Hazard Mater 164:580–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US-EPA (2002) Environmental assessment of proposed effluent limitations guidelines and standards for the meat and poultry products industry point source. In: Office of water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA-821-B-01008

    Google Scholar 

  • US-EPA (2004) Effluent limitations guidelines and new source performance standards for the meat and poultry products point source category. In: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Federal Register 69 (173)

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lier JB, Mahmoud N, Zeeman G (2008) Anaerobic wastewater treatment, biological wastewater treatment, principles, modelling and design, pp 415–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Verstraete I (1983) Biomethanation of wastes: perspectives and potentials. In: International conference on the commercial applications and implications of biotechnology. vol 1, pp 725–742

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacławek S, Lutze HV, Grübel K, Padil VV, Černík M, Dionysiou DD (2017) Chemistry of persulfates in water and wastewater treatment: a review. Chem Eng J 330:44–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasar A, Rasheed R, Tabinda AB, Tahir A, Sarwar F (2017) Life cycle assessment of a medium commercial scale biogas plant and nutritional assessment of effluent slurry. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 67:364–371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Liu Y, Tian C, Wang Z, Cheng M, Chen N, Feng C (2014) A bibliometric analysis of research on upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) from 1983 to 2012. Scientometrics 100:189–202

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Loganath .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Loganath, R., Mazumder, D. (2021). Acclimation and Treatability Studies on Slaugter House Wastewater by Hybrid UASB Reactor. In: Pandey, A., Mishra, S., Kansal, M., Singh, R., Singh, V. (eds) Climate Impacts on Water Resources in India. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 95. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51427-3_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics