Skip to main content

Impact on Bentonite Due to the Presence of Various Concentrations of Lead and Copper Solutions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainable Environmental Geotechnics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 89))

  • 444 Accesses

Abstract

Heavy metals are directly introduced to the environment, groundwater and waterways by means of several industrial activities. Migration of metal from the landfill to the surrounding environment is a serious environmental issue worldwide. A liner is a low permeable material used in the waste disposal sites to prevent the migration of toxic pollutants to contaminate the surrounding atmosphere and groundwater resources. Compacted bentonite is used as a liner material because of its high sorption capacity, low hydraulic conductivity and high swelling capacity. The presence of chemicals in the leachate can shrink the thickness of the diffuse double layer (DDL) and may reduce the effectiveness of the liner by reducing its swelling capacity and increasing hydraulic conductivity. Therefore, in the present study, high swelling bentonite is analysed on the change in their behaviour due to the presence of copper (Cu2+) and lead (Pb2+) solutions. One of the essential behaviours of bentonite is consolidation, which is necessary for investigating the settlement analysis of the liner. The study was conducted to determine the impact of lead (Pb2+) and copper (Cu2+) solutions of different concentrations, on the consolidation behaviour of bentonite. In the existence of lead (Pb2+) and copper (Cu2+) of concentrations of 0, 500 and 1000 mg/L, various consolidation parameters, such as compression index (Cc), coefficient of consolidation (cv), volume change (mv) and time, are required for the completion of 90% of consolidation (t90), which were studied. Result shows that cv increases with an increase in concentration of the heavy metal, whereas Cc, mv and t90 of the bentonite decrease. The study also indicates that the rate of consolidation of the bentonite increases in the presence of copper and lead. The results of this study may deliver a general idea for estimating the liner performance in the presence of different kinds of toxic chemicals existing in the leachate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ernst WHO: Mine vegetation in Europe. Heavy metal tolerance in plants: evolutionary aspects. In: Shaw AJ (ed) CRC, BocaRaton (1990), pp 21–51

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ernst WHO: Decontamination or consolidation of metalcontaminated soils by biological means. Heavy metals: problems and solutions. In: Salomons W, Forstner U, Mader P (eds) Springer, Berlin (1995), pp 141–149

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang S, Shi X (2001) Molecular mechanisms of metal toxicity and carcinogenesis. Mol Cell Biochem 222:3–9 [PubMed: 11678608]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beyersmann D, Hartwig A (2008) Carcinogenic metal compounds: recent insight into molecular and cellular mechanisms. Arch Toxicol 82(8):493–512 [PubMed: 18496671]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dutta J, Mishra AK (2016) Consolidation behaviour of bentonite in the presence of salt solution. Appl Clay Sci 120:61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Khan SA, Riaz-ur-Rehman, Khan MA (1955b) Sorption of strontium on bentonite. Waste Manage 15(8):641–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-053X(96)00049-9

  7. Lo I, Luk A, Yang X (2004) Migration of heavy metals in saturated sand and bentonite/soil admixture. J Environ Eng 130:906–909. Special Issue: Waste Containment Barrier Materials (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ouhadi VR, Yong RN, Sedighi M (2006) Influence of heavy metal contaminants at variable pH regimes on rheological behaviour of bentonite. Appl Clay Sci 32:217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakano A, Li LY, Ohtsubo M, Mishra AK (2008) Lead retention mechanisms and hydraulic conductivity studies of various bentonites for geoenvironment applications. Environ Technol 29:505–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Du YJ, Fan RD, Reddy KR, Liu SY, Yang YL (2015) Impacts of presence of lead contamination in clayey soil–calcium bentonite cutoff wall backfills. Appl Clay Sci 108:111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ASTM (2000) Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. D 4318. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  12. ASTM (2001) Standard test method for swell index of clay mineral component of geosynthetic clay liners. D 5890. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  13. ASTM (2002) Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. D 422-63. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chapman HD (1965) Cation exchange capacity. Methods of soil analysis, part 2 chemical and microbiological properties. 2nd edn. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 891–895

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pratt PF (1965) Sodium, methods of soil analysis, part 2 chemical and microbiological properties, 2nd edn. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 1031–1034

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cerato AB, Lutenegger AJ (2002) Determination of surface area of fine-grained soils by the ethylene glycol monoethyl ether (EGME) method. Geotech Test J 25:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  17. ASTM D698 (2012) Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  18. Prudent P, Domeizel M, Massiani C (1996) Chemical sequential extraction as a decision-making tool: application to municipal solid waste and its individual constituents. Sci Total Environ 178:55–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. ASTM (1996) Standard test method for one-dimensional consolidation properties of soils. D 2435. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  20. Taylor DW (1948) Fundamentals of soil mechanics. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Ouhadi VR, Sedighi M (2003) Variation of experimental results of oedometer testing due to the changes of pore fluid. In: Deformation characteristics of geomaterials. Taylor & Francis, New York, pp 299–304

    Google Scholar 

  22. Robinson RG, Allam MM (1998) Effect of clay mineralogy on coefficient of consolidation. Clays Clay Miner 46(5):596–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mishra AK, Ohtsubo M, Li LY, Higashi T (2010) Influence of the bentonite on the consolidation behaviour of soil bentonite mixtures. Carbonates Evaporites 25(1):43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saswati Ray .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ray, S., Mishra, A.K., Kalamdhad, A.S. (2020). Impact on Bentonite Due to the Presence of Various Concentrations of Lead and Copper Solutions. In: Reddy, K.R., Agnihotri, A.K., Yukselen-Aksoy, Y., Dubey, B.K., Bansal, A. (eds) Sustainable Environmental Geotechnics. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 89. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51350-4_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51350-4_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51349-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51350-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics