Skip to main content

Sustainability of Vertical Barriers for Environmental Containment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainable Environmental Geotechnics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 89))

Abstract

Vertical barriers have long been used to control groundwater flow and subsurface contaminant migration from contaminated land sites. Commonly employed vertical barrier types available to owners and designers include those constructed using slurry trenching techniques such as soil-bentonite (SB), and cement-bentonite with slag (slag-CB), in situ soil mixed walls (SMW), as well as driven barriers such as sheet piles. The selection of the appropriate vertical barrier technique depended upon site geology, cost, and regulatory requirements with no consideration of the global environmental impact of the type of vertical barrier chosen in terms of sustainable engineering. In this paper, the sustainability of four commonly deployed vertical barrier techniques is discussed. Using the case study method, the paper evaluates a previously completed project where an SB slurry wall was constructed. Evaluations are described for an environmental sustainability assessment (based on the materials, fuels, and equipment used; transport distances for personnel travel and materials/equipment transport), an economic sustainability assessment (based on the direct and indirect costs), and a social sustainability assessment (based on a survey taken by stakeholders/professionals/experts). The paper closes with findings, conclusions, and recommendations regarding the sustainability of vertical barriers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Evans JC (1993) Vertical Cutoff Walls, Chap. 17. In: Daniel DE (ed) Geotechnical practice for waste disposal. Chapman and Hall

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ruffing DG, Evans JC, Coughenour N (2018) Soil-Bentonite Slurry trench cutoff wall longevity. In: International foundations congress and equipment expo, pp 214–223

    Google Scholar 

  3. Opdyke SM, Evans JC (2005) Slag-cement-Bentonite Slurry Walls. ASCE J. Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131(6):673–681

    Google Scholar 

  4. Evans JC, Garbin EJ (2009) The TRD Method for In Situ Mixed Vertical Barriers. In: Proceedings of the U.S.-China workshop on ground improvement technologies GSP188, pp 271–280

    Google Scholar 

  5. Reddy KR, Kumar G (2019) Application of triple bottom line sustainability framework to select remediation method at industrial contaminated site. In: Proceedings of GeoCongress, ASCE, Reston, VA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reddy KR, Adams JA (2015) Sustainable remediation of contaminated sites. Momentum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reddy KR, Chetri JK, Kiser K (2018) Quantitative sustainability assessment of various remediation alternatives for contaminated lake sediments: case study. Sustain J Record 11(6):307–321. (https://doi.org/10.1089/sus.2018.0021)

  8. Pré (2018) SimaPro 8.5 LCA software. Amersfoort, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  9. International Standardization Organization (ISO) (2006) Environmental management –life cycle assessment –principles and framework ISO 14040

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bare JC (2002) TRACI. J Ind Ecol 6(3‐4):49–78

    Google Scholar 

  11. USEPA (2017) The Social Cost of Carbon. https://19january2017snapshot.epa.gov/climatechange/social-cost-carbon_.html. (Accessed 29 Jan 2018)

  12. U.S.C. §4321 et seq (1969) http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/social-sustainability.html

  13. Reddy KR, Sadasivam BY, Adams JA (2014) Sustainability evaluation matrix (SSEM) to quantify social aspects of sustainable remediation. In: ICSI 2014: creating infrastructure for a sustainable world, ASCE, pp 831–841

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation (Award# 1463198) that enabled the construction of the SB cutoff wall used as a basis for this sustainability analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey C. Evans .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Evans, J.C., Ruffing, D.G., Reddy, K.R., Kumar, G., Chetri, J.K. (2020). Sustainability of Vertical Barriers for Environmental Containment. In: Reddy, K.R., Agnihotri, A.K., Yukselen-Aksoy, Y., Dubey, B.K., Bansal, A. (eds) Sustainable Environmental Geotechnics. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 89. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51350-4_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51350-4_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51349-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51350-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics