Skip to main content

Designer Thinking, A Unique Combination of Cognitive Modes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Industrial Design (AHFE 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1202))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2833 Accesses

Abstract

The theory of cognitive modes states that individuals have unique and dominant ways of receiving, processing, and using information and that these styles influence behaviors and abilities. These abilities are natural talents. Every profession uses different. The work someone is most likely to enjoy and be successful in is work that uses his or her specific abilities. Research identifies three dominant cognitive modes for industrial designers: creative thinking, visual thinking, and adaptive thinking. This paper describes a series of experiences developed to help assess creative, visual, and adaptive thinking in students that are considering the industrial design program at Brigham Young University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agor, W.: How top executives use their intuition to make important decisions. Bus. Horiz. 29(1), 49–53 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bochner, S.: Defining intolerance of ambiguity. Psychol. Rec. 15, 393–400 (1965). http://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393605

  • Budner, S.: Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. J. Pers. 30, 29–50 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L., Shepard, R.: Turning something over in the mind. Sci. Am. 251(6), 106–115 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelb, M.: How to Think Like Leonardo da Vinci. Dell Publishing, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J.P., Hoepfner, R.: The Analysis of Intelligence. McGraw-Hill, New York (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, E.: Psychological Testing at Work: How to Use, Interpret, and Get the Most Out of the Newest Tests in Personality, Learning Style, Aptitudes, Interests, and More!. McGraw-Hill, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Donald Jr., A.P.: Revised scale for ambiguity tolerance: reliability and validity. Psychol. Rep. 26(3), 791–798 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLain, D.L., Kefallonitis, E., Armani, K.: Ambiguity tolerance in organizations: definitional clarification and perspectives on future research. Front. Psychol. 6, 344 (2015). http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg

  • NASAD.: National Association of Schools of Art and Design, Brigham Young University Visitors Report. Reston, VA (2016a)

    Google Scholar 

  • NASAD. 2016. National Association of Schools of Art and Design Handbook, Standards and Guidelines, 106. Reston, VA (2016b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe, N., Frick, A.: Early education for spatial intelligence: why, what, and how. Mind Brain Educ. 4(3), 102–111 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M.: Divergent Thinking (Creativity Research), vol. xi, p. 199. Ablex Publishing, Norwood (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, L.: Finding and Serving Gifted Children with Learning Disabilities. Address to the Colorado Parent Institute, Denver (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaggs, P.: Aptitudes for industrial design. Master’s thesis, Rochester Institute of Technology (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R., Lubart, T.: Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity. Free Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, H., Hiraki, K.: Constraints and their relaxation in the processes of insight. Cogn. Stud. Bull. Jpn. Cogn. Sci. Soc. 5(2) (1998). http://wsd.irc.aoyama.ac.jp/hiblog/suzuki/files/2009/07/etlreport97.pdf

  • Torrance, P.: A national climate for creativity and invention. Gifted Child Today 15(1), 10–14 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware, C.: Visual Thinking: For Design. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Skaggs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Skaggs, P. (2020). Designer Thinking, A Unique Combination of Cognitive Modes. In: Di Bucchianico, G., Shin, C., Shim, S., Fukuda, S., Montagna, G., Carvalho, C. (eds) Advances in Industrial Design. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1202. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51194-4_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51194-4_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51193-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51194-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics