Skip to main content

How to Democratize Internet of Things Devices: A Participatory Design Study to Improve Digital Literacy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Industrial Design (AHFE 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1202))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The global introduction of affordable Internet of Things (IoT) devices offers an opportunity to empower a large variety of users with different needs. However, many off-the-shelf digital products are still not widely adopted by people who are hesitant technology users or by older adults, notwithstanding that the design and user-interaction of these devices is recognized to be user-friendly. Considering the habits and preferences of those who have used mainly analog devices for most of their lives, such users may encounter challenges such as digital illiteracy and technology anxiety when faced with newly-released digital IoT-based products. In view of the potential of IoT-based devices, how can we reduce the obstacles of a cohort with low digital literacy and technology anxiety and enable them to be equal participants in the digitalized world? This article shows the method and results achieved in a community-stakeholder workshop, developed through the participatory design methodology, aiming at brainstorming problems and scenarios through a focus group and a structured survey. The research activity focused on understanding factors to increase the usability of off-the-shelf IoT devices for hesitant users and identifying strategies for improving digital literacy and reducing technology anxiety.

A notable result was a series of feedback items pointing to the importance of facilitating educational experiences through learning resources to support individuals with different abilities, age, gender expression, to better adopt off-the-shelf IoT-based solutions. This fundamental first step of user experience research generated considerations for designing open-source learning tools to foster inclusive and more accessible use of IoT-based technologies for improving older people’s daily activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. European Commission: Population ageing in Europe. https://bit.ly/2NcjHC7. Accessed 18 Jan 2020

  2. United Nations: Sustainable Development Goals, August 2016. https://bit.ly/2d4dcA4. Accessed 20 Jan 2020

  3. World Health Organisation: Measuring the age-friendliness of cities (2015). https://bit.ly/2ARrhjY. Accessed 20 Jan 2020

  4. Jorgensen, B., Stedman, R.: Sense of place as an attachment: Lakeshore owners’ attitudes toward their properties. J. Environ. Psychol. 21, 233–248 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp2001.0226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Task Force on Research and Development for Technology to Support Aging Adults. Emerging Technologies to Support an Aging Population; Committee on Technology of the National Science & Technology Council: Washington, DC, USA (2019). https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Emerging-Tech-to-Support-Aging-2019.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2020

  6. Peek, S.T., Luijkx, K.G., Rijnaard, M.D., Nieboer, M.E., Van der Voort, C.S., Aarts, S., Van Hoof, J., Vrijhoef, H.J., Wouters, E.J.: Older adults’ reasons for using technology while aging in place. Gerontology 62(2), 226–237 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoque, R., Sorwar, G.: Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mHealth by the elderly: an extension of the UTAUT model. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2017(101), 75–84 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vaportzis, E., Clausen, M.G., Gow, A.J.: Older adults perceptions of technology and barriers to interacting with tablet computers: a focus group study. Front. Psychol. 8, 1687 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsai, H.S., Shillair, R., Cotten, S.R.: Social support and “playing around”: an examination of how older adults acquire digital literacy with tablet computers. J. Appl. Gerontol.: Off. J. Southern Gerontol. Soc. 36(1), 29–55 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464815609440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Martínez-Alcalá, C.I., Rosales-Lagarde, A., Alonso-Lavernia, M.Á., Ramírez-Salvador, J.Á., Jiménez-Rodríguez, B., Cepeda-Rebollar, R.M., López-Noguerola, J.S., Bautista-Díaz, M.L., Agis-Juárez, R.A.: Digital inclusion in older adults: a comparison between face-to-face and blended digital literacy workshops. Front. ICT 5, 21 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2018.00021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zallio, M., Fisk, M.J.: Smart Homes. In: Gu, D., Dupre, M. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging. Springer, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lorenz, A., Oppermann, R.: Mobile health monitoring for the elderly: designing for diversity. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 5, 478–495 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, S., Bolling, K., Mao, W., Reichstadt, J., Jeste, D., Kim H.C., Nebeker, C.: Technology to support aging in place: older adults’ perspectives. In: Healthcare, vol. 7, no. 60 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7020060

  14. Schreurs, K., Quan‐Haase, A., Martin, K.: Problematizing the digital literacy paradox in the context of older adults’ ICT use: aging, media discourse, and self-determination. Can. J. Commun. 42(2) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Muller, M.J., Kuhn, S.: Participatory design. Commun. ACM 36(6), 24–28 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Muller, M.J.: PICTIVE—an exploration in participatory design. In: Robertson, S.P., Olson, G.M., Olson, J.S. (eds.) Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1991), pp. 225–231. ACM, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Spinuzzi, C.: The methodology of participatory design. Tech. Commun. 52, 163–174 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Clement, A.: Computing at work: empowering action by “low-level” users. Commun. ACM 37(1), 52–63 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Morgan, D.L., Spanish, M.T.: Focus groups: a new tool for qualitative research. Qual. Sociol. 7, 253 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Phillips, A.W.: Proper applications for surveys as a study methodology. Western J. Emerg. Med. 18(1), 8–11 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.11.32000

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Wittink, D.R., Bayer, L.R.: The measurement imperative. Mark. Res. 6, 14–23 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zallio, M., McGrory, J., Berry, D.: How to democratize internet of things devices. A participatory design research (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.06308

  23. Linkage Connect Technology Survey. https://linkageconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/2019-Link-age-Connect-Technology-Study-Report.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2020

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research, as an impulse into a larger international project (Hands-on SHAFE funded under the ERASMUS+programme), was made possible thanks to the Active Assisted Living Forum, in Aarhus, Denmark on September 23–25, 2019. A team of researchers from Stanford University (USA) and Technological University Dublin (Ireland) developed the participatory design research and successfully run the collaborative workshop supported by the AAL Programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Zallio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zallio, M., McGrory, J., Berry, D. (2020). How to Democratize Internet of Things Devices: A Participatory Design Study to Improve Digital Literacy. In: Di Bucchianico, G., Shin, C., Shim, S., Fukuda, S., Montagna, G., Carvalho, C. (eds) Advances in Industrial Design. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1202. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51194-4_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51194-4_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51193-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51194-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics