Skip to main content

Investigating Enablers to Improve Transparency in Sustainable Food Supply Chain Using F-BWM

  • 1575 Accesses

Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC,volume 1197)

Abstract

Food Supply Chains (FSC) are complex and dynamic in behavior and prone to increasing risks of unsustainability. Consumers increasingly demand food quality, safety, and sustainability, which are fast becoming issues of great importance in FSC. Lack of real-time information sharing and connectivity among stakeholders make these issues tougher to mitigate. Supply chain transparency (SCT) is thus an essential attribute to manage these supply chain complexities and enhance the sustainability of FSC. The paper identifies and analyses key enablers for SCT in FSC. Several technical, as well as sustainability-related enablers, contribute to the implementation of SCT. The identified enablers are analyzed using Fuzzy-best worst methodology (F-BWM), which determine the most critical factors using the decision maker’s opinion. Extending BWM with fuzzy logic incorporates the vagueness of human-behaviour into decision making approach. The results of this research provides decision makers with the priority of enablers to the decision maker. Enhancing these enablers in will help improve the transparency for better management of FSC. The article expands upon the practical as well as theoretical implications of SCT on sustainability in FSC. It addresses the requirement of including sustainability in the decision-making process. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the F-BWM for the decision making process. The study is conducted by considering downstream supply chain activities in Indian context. It is one of the first studies that analyzes SCT enablers using F-BWM method in Indian context. The study contributes towards improving the environmental, economical, and social sustainability of FSC.

Keywords

  • Supply chain transparency
  • Fuzzy-best worst method
  • Sustainable food supply chain

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-51156-2_65
  • Chapter length: 9 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-51156-2
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

References

  1. Kumar, A., Mangla, S.K., Kumar, P., Karamperidis, S.: Challenges in perishable food supply chains for sustainability management: a developing economy perspective (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2470

  2. Confederation of Indian Industry: Food Traceability in India A study report by CII FACE & GS1 India (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shankar, R., Gupta, R., Pathak, D.K.: Modeling critical success factors of traceability for food logistics system. Transp. Res. 119, 205–222 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2018.03.006

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, J., Yue, H.: Food safety pre-warning system based on data mining for a sustainable food supply chain. Food Control 73, 223–229 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.09.048

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Astill, J., Dara, R.A., Campbell, M., Farber, J.M., Fraser, E.D.G., Sharif, S., Yada, R.Y.: Transparency in food supply chains: a review of enabling technology solutions. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 91, 240–247 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.024

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar, S., Kumar, P., Kumar, M.: Resources, conservation and recycling risk analysis in green supply chain using fuzzy AHP approach: a case study. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 104, 375–390 (2015)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G.: Decision making with the analytic network process economic, political, social and technological applications with benefits, opportunities, costs and risks (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7279-7

  8. Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H.: Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156, 445–455 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1

    CrossRef  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Tyagi, M., Kumar, P., Kumar, D.: Assessment of CSR based supply chain performance system using an integrated fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 21, 378–406 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2017.1422707

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Rezaei, J.: Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega (United Kingdom). 53, 49–57 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Wognum, P.M., Bremmers, H., Trienekens, J.H., Van Der Vorst, J.G.A.J., Bloemhof, J.M.: Systems for sustainability and transparency of food supply chains - current status and challenges. Adv. Eng. Inf. 25, 65–76 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2010.06.001

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Bai, C., Sarkis, J.: A supply chain transparency and sustainability technology appraisal model for blockchain technology. Int. J. Prod. Res. 1–21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1708989

  13. Ringsberg, H.: Perspectives on food traceability: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 19, 558–576 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-01-2014-0026

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. Bastian, J., Zentes, J.: Supply chain transparency as a key prerequisite for sustainable agri-food supply chain management (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2013.834836. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2013.834836

  15. Bosona, T., Gebresenbet, G.: Food traceability as an integral part of logistics management in food and agricultural supply chain. Food Control 33, 32–48 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.02.004

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao, G., Liu, S., Lopez, C., Lu, H., Elgueta, S., Chen, H., Boshkoska, B.M.: Blockchain technology in agri-food value chain management: a synthesis of applications, challenges and future research directions. Comput. Ind. 109, 83–99 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.04.002

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. Cagliano, R., Worley, C.G., Caniato, F.F.A.: The challenge of sustainable innovation in agri-food supply chains. Organ. Sustain. Eff. 5, 1–30 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/S2045-060520160000005009

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. Bilyea, T., Mcinnes, D.: With natural capital and trust, Canada can become an agrifood powerhouse (2016). https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/rob-commentary/with-capital-and-trust-canada-can-become-an-agrifood-powerhouse/article30989002/

  19. Insight, L.: How consumer demand for transparency is shaping the food industry (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Faisal, M.N.: A study of inhibitors to transparency in red meat supply chains in Gulf cooperation council (GCC) countries. Bus. Process Manag. J. 21, 1299–1318 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-11-2014-0107

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu, X., Lu, Y., Xu, H., Lv, M., Hu, D., He, Z., Liu, L., Wang, Z., Feng, Y.: Challenges to improve the safety of dairy products in China (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.03.019

  22. Gupta, R., Shankar, R.: Ranking of collusive behaviour in Indian agro-supply chain using interval 2-tuple linguistic TOPSIS method. J. Model. Manag. 11, 949–966 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-03-2015-0006

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  23. Creydt, M., Fischer, M.: Blockchain and more - algorithm driven food traceability. Food Control 105, 45–51 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.05.019

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  24. Mani, V., Gunasekaran, A.: Four forces of supply chain social sustainability adoption in emerging economies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 199, 150–161 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.02.015

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaur, H.: Modelling internet of things driven sustainable food security system. Benchmarking (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2018-0431

  26. Guo, S., Zhao, H.: Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Knowl.-Based Syst. 121, 23–31 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.01.010

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  27. Karimi, H., Sadeghi-Dastaki, M., Javan, M.: A fully fuzzy best–worst multi attribute decision making method with triangular fuzzy number: a case study of maintenance assessment in the hospitals. Appl. Soft Comput. J. 86 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105882

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasanur Kayikci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kumar, A., Mangla, S.K., Kumar, P., Kayikci, Y. (2021). Investigating Enablers to Improve Transparency in Sustainable Food Supply Chain Using F-BWM. In: Kahraman, C., Cevik Onar, S., Oztaysi, B., Sari, I., Cebi, S., Tolga, A. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques: Smart and Innovative Solutions. INFUS 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1197. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51156-2_65

Download citation