Abstract
The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates older adults aged 60+ will double by 2050 with 80% living in low to moderate income countries. As remote research studies supported by digital devices increase separation between researchers and participants, it is important to maintain participant trust. Research participants have expressed an interest in accessing both group and individual level results, which are not readily available. To bridge this gap, we engaged residents of a local continuing care senior housing community (CCSHC) to co-design documents used to convey information about study results. The process informed the refinement of informational materials for communicating scientific research that the CCSHC community considers accessible and meaningful.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
United Nations: Ageing. https://www.un.org/en/sections/issues-depth/ageing/
Matthew-Maich, N., Harris, L., Ploeg, J., Markle-Reid, M., Valaitis, R., Ibrahim, S., Gafni, A., Isaacs, S.: Designing, implementing, and evaluating mobile health technologies for managing chronic conditions in older adults: a scoping review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 4, e29 (2016)
Dunseath, S., Weibel, N., Bloss, C.S., Nebeker, C.: NIH support of mobile, imaging, pervasive sensing, social media and location tracking (MISST) research: laying the foundation to examine research ethics in the digital age. npj Digital Med. 1, 1–6 (2018)
Denny, J.C., Goldstein, D.B., Philippakis, A., Smoller, J.W., Jenkins, G., Dishman, E.: The “All of Us” research program. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 668–676 (2019)
Khodyakov, D., Mendoza-Graf, A., Berry, S., Nebeker, C., Bromley, E.: Return of value in the new era of biomedical research—one size will not fit all. AJOB Empirical Bioethics 10, 265–275 (2019)
National Academies of Sciences: Engineering, Medicine: Returning Individual Research Results to Participants: Guidance for a New Research Paradigm., Washington, DC (2018)
Wong, C.A., Hernandez, A.F., Califf, R.M.: Return of research results to study participants: uncharted and untested. JAMA 320, 435–436 (2018)
Wang, S., Bolling, K., Mao, W., Reichstadt, J., Jeste, D., Kim, H.-C., Nebeker, C.: Technology to support aging in place: older adults’ perspectives. Healthcare (Basel), 7, 60 (2019)
Jeste, D.V., Glorioso, D., Lee, E.E., Daly, R., Graham, S., Liu, J., Paredes, A.M., Nebeker, C., Tu, X.M., Twamley, E.W., Patten, R.V., Yamada, Y., Depp, C., Kim, H.-C.: Study of independent living residents of a continuing care senior housing community: sociodemographic and clinical associations of cognitive, physical, and mental health. Am. J. Geriatric Psychiatry 27, 895–907 (2019)
Gorny, A.W., Liew, S.J., Tan, C.S., Müller-Riemenschneider, F.: Fitbit charge HR wireless heart rate monitor: validation study conducted under free-living conditions. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 5, e157 (2017)
de Zambotti, M., Goldstone, A., Claudatos, S., Colrain, I.M., Baker, F.C.: A validation study of Fitbit Charge 2TM compared with polysomnography in adults. Chronobiol. Int. 35, 465–476 (2018)
Fitabase - Research Device Data and Analytics. https://www.fitabase.com/
Bunnik, E.M., van Bodegom, L., Pinxten, W., de Beaufort, I.D., Vernooij, M.W.: Ethical framework for the detection, management and communication of incidental findings in imaging studies, building on an interview study of researchers’ practices and perspectives. BMC Med Ethics. 18, (2017)
Illes, J., Kirschen, M.P., Edwards, E., Stanford, L.R., Bandettini, P., Cho, M.K., Ford, P.J., Glover, G.H., Kulynych, J., Macklin, R., Michael, D.B., Wolf, S.M.: Incidental findings in brain imaging research. Science 311, 783–784 (2006)
McGuire, A.L., Joffe, S., Koenig, B.A., Biesecker, B.B., McCullough, L.B., Blumenthal-Barby, J.S., Caulfield, T., Terry, S.F., Green, R.C.: Ethics and genomic incidental findings. Science 340, 1047–1048 (2013)
Wolf, S.M.: The continuing evolution of ethical standards for genomic sequencing in clinical care: restoring patient choice. J. Law, Med. Ethics 45, 333–340 (2017)
Zawati, M.H., Knoppers, B.M.: International normative perspectives on the return of individual research results and incidental findings in genomic biobanks. Genet Med. 14, 484–489 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wang, S., Lee, E.E., Zywicki, B., Kim, HC., Jeste, D., Nebeker, C. (2020). Predictive Analytics and the Return of “Research” Information to Participants. In: Spohrer, J., Leitner, C. (eds) Advances in the Human Side of Service Engineering. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1208. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51057-2_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51057-2_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51056-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51057-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)