Skip to main content

Utilizing Change Management Principles to Establish Organizational Infrastructure and Operations That Drive Salary Equity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Closing the Gender Pay Gap in Medicine
  • 780 Accesses

Abstract

Salary equity initiatives require intentionality, vision, longitudinal planning, and fortitude. Organizations should employ change management models and techniques to create governance structures, anticipate and address responses to equity initiatives, communicate compensation philosophies and policies, and conduct data-driven assessments of current and future states. Rigorous salary studies are essential to identify baseline inequities and should be ongoing to ensure sustainability and forward movement in closing the pay gap. Making sure the data gathered are reliable and reproducible builds trust in the effort as does consistent communication about goals and progress. Assessing organizational culture and practices for implicit gender bias that fuels salary disparities is critical as is institutional financial commitment. Avoiding the temptation to fix everything and not allowing the enormity of the situation to distract from what can be done drive success. Overcoming processes that have been in place for decades will take time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Morahan PS, Rosen SE, Richman RC, Gleason KA. The Leadership Continuum: a framework for organizational and individual assessment relative to the advancement of women physicians and scientists. J Women’s Health. 2011;20:387–56. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2010.2055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kotter JP. Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Juneja P. Organization change and transition management. MSC Management Study Guide. www.managementstudyguide.com/organizational-change-and-transition-management.htm. Accessed 15 Nov 2019.

  4. Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Cycle. 2009. https://innovations.ahrq.gov/qualitytools/plan-do-study-act-pdsa-cycle. Accessed 16 Nov 2019.

  5. Lewis RE, Silver JK, Bernstein CA, Mills AM, Overholser B, Spector ND. Is academic medicine making mid-career women physicians invisible? J Women’s Health. 2020;29:187. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2019.7732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sinek S. Start with why: how great leaders inspire everyone to take action. 16th ed. London: Penguin; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Canal E. 25 inspirational quotes by powerful women. Forbes. 2016 May. Available from https://www.forbes.com/sites/emilycanal/2016/03/19/25-inspirational-quotes-by-powerful-women/#25d8132a2d84. Accessed 8 Mar 2020.

  8. Carr PL, Gunn CM, Kaplan SA, Raj A, Freund KM. Inadequate progress for women in academic medicine: findings from the National Faculty Study. J Women’s Health. 2015;24:190. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2014.4848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dandar VM, Lautenberger DM, Garrison GE. Promising practices for understanding and addressing salary equity at US Medical Schools. Association of American Medical Colleges. 2019. https://store.aamc.org/downloadable/download/sample/sample_id/278/. Accessed 8 Mar 2020.

  10. Heru AM. Pink-collar medicine: women and the future of medicine. Gend Issues. 2005;22:20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-005-0008-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Spector ND, Asante PA, Marcelin JR, Poorman JA, Larson AR, Salles A, et al. Women in pediatrics: progress, barriers, and opportunities for equity, diversity and inclusion. Pediatrics. 2019;144(5):e20192149. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-2149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Berlin G, Darino L, Greenfield M, Starikova I. Women in the healthcare industry. McKinsey & Co. June 2019. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/healthcare-systems-and-services/our-insights/women-in-the-healthcare-industry.

  13. Schor NF. The decanal divide: women in decanal roles at U.S. Medical Schools. Acad Med. 2018;93:237–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heru PL, Raj A, Kaplan SE, Terrin N, Breeze JL, Freund KM. Gender differences in academic medicine: retention, rank, and leadership comparisons from the national faculty survey. Acad Med. 2018;93:1694–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jena AB, Khullar D, Ho O, Olenski AR, Blumenthal DM. Sex differences in academic rank in US Medical Schools in 2014. JAMA. 2015;314(11):1149–58. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.10680.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Templeton K, Bernstein CA, Sukhera J, Nora LM, Newman C, Burstin H, et al. Gender-based differences in burnout: issues faced by women physicians. 2019. https://nam.edu/gender-based-differences-in-burnout-issues-faced-by-women-physicians. Accessed 8 Mar 2020.

  17. Smith D, Rosenstein J, Nikolov M. The different words we use to describe male and female leaders. Harvard Business Review, May 2018. https://hbr.org/2018/05/the-different-words-we-use-to-describe-male-and-female-leaders. Accessed 27 July 2020.

  18. Moss-Racusin CA, Dovidio JF, Brescoll VL, Graham MJ, Handelsman J. Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(41):16474–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Trix F, Psenka C. Exploring the color of glass: letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse Soc. 2003;14(2):191–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mackenzie L, Wehner J, Correll SJ. Why most performance evaluations are biased, and how to fix them. Harvard Business Review, January 2019. https://hbr.org/2019/01/why-most-performance-evaluations-are-biased-and-how-to-fix-them. Accessed 8 Mar 2020.

  21. Rock D, Jones B. Why more and more companies are ditching performance ratings. Harvard Business Review, September 2015. www.hbr.org/2015/09/why-more-and-more-companies-are-ditching-performance-ratings. Accessed 16 Nov 2019.

  22. Benton M, Ridziwill N. Merit pay in higher education. J Qual Particip. 2016;39:39–3.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lo Sasso AT, Armstrong D, Forte G, Gerber SE. Differences in starting pay for male and female physicians persist: explanations for the gender gap remain elusive. Health Aff. 2020;39:256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Thibault G. Women in academic medicine. Acad Med. 2016;91:1045–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rao AD, Nicholas SE, Kachniarz B, Hu C, Redmond KJ, Deville C, et al. Association of a simulated institutional gender equity initiative with gender-based disparities in medical school faculty salaries and promotions. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(8):e186054. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.605.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimara Ellefson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ellefson, K., Eide, K. (2021). Utilizing Change Management Principles to Establish Organizational Infrastructure and Operations That Drive Salary Equity. In: Gottlieb, MD, FACP, A.S. (eds) Closing the Gender Pay Gap in Medicine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51031-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51031-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51030-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51031-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics