Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Challenges and Developments in Integrated Container Supply Chains: A Research Agenda for the Europe-China Research Network on Integrated Container Supply Chains (ENRICH) Project

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Collaborative Logistics and Intermodality

  • 540 Accesses

Abstract

Since the start of the current century the world has experienced uncertainties in the form of climate change, epidemics, terrorism threats and increasing economic upheaval. These uncertainties create risks for the proper functioning of logistics management and have stimulated research into the development of resilient and sustainable container supply chains (CSCs). The purpose of this study is to examine the research challenges facing the development of resilient and sustainable CSCs and, more specifically, to identify opportunities and provide recommendations for future studies into the operational research, safety, security and resilience, climate change, ICT and intermodal transportation aspects of CSCs. The work will highlight the most difficult research problems in the engineering, operations and management of CSC systems. The proposed research will have a significant impact on our understanding of how the resilience and sustainability of CSC systems can be enhanced through the gathering and exchange of knowledge and expertise in different aspects of CSCs in a newly established consortium funded by the EU (i.e. ENRICH—EC-ChiNa Research Network on Integrated Container Supply Chains, 2013–2017). The success of the research project will provide vital information on how to improve the resilience of CSCs more effectively and how to enhance the sustainability of supply chains in an ever-changing environment where new technologies are developed and introduced. To achieve this objective, this work reviews the major research challenges for, and developments in, integrated CSCs and demonstrates the major uncertainties in CSC operations due to climate change, terrorist threats and increasing economic upheaval. It will also provide insights into the research directions and agenda necessary for tackling these uncertainties in a holistic way at the level of the entire chain, through the use of ICT and intermodal logistics management techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acciaro, M., & McKinnon, A. (2013). Efficient hinterland transport infrastructure and services for large container ports. In International Transport Forum Discussion Paper. http://www.internationaltransportforum.org/jtrc/RoundTables/2013-Container-Shipping/Acciaro-MackinnonHintgerlandNov2013.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2014.

  • Arendt, F., Meyer-Larsen, N., Muller, R., & Veenstra, A. W. (2012). Practical approaches towards enhanced security and visibility in international intermodal container supply chains. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 4(2), 182–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, T. J. (1981). Packaging trends and implications in the container revolution. Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, 12, 427–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aven, T. (2009). Identification of safety and security critical systems and activities. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 94, 404–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bier, V. M., & von Winterfeldt, D. (2007). Meeting the challenges of terrorism risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 27, 503–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchery, Y., & Fransoo J. (2014a). Cost, carbon emissions and modal shift in intermodal network design decisions. Internal Report, BETA publication: Working Papers, 452, 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchery, Y., & Fransoo J. (2014b). Intermodal hinterland network design with multiple actors. Internal Report, BETA publication: Working Papers, 449, 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braekers, K., Janssens, G. K., & Caris, A. (2011). Challenges in managing empty container movements at multiple planning levels. Transport Reviews, 31(6), 681–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braekers, K., Caris, A., & Janssens, G. K. (2013). Integrated planning of loaded and empty container movements. OR Spectrum, 35(2), 457–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canada. (2003). Security & emergency preparedness, marine transportation regulations. Canada: Government of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caris, A., Macharis, C., & Janssens, G. K. (2013). Decision support in intermodal transport: A new research agenda. Computers in Industry, 64(2), 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cepolina, S. (2011). Fostering the garment industry competitiveness: The ICT contribution. Global Journal of Enterprise Information System, 3(2), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M. (1998). Logistics and supply management. London: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Císařová, H., & Široký, J. (2009). Logistics technology and the city logistics. Logistics in Materials, 4(4), 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comendador, J., López-Lambas, M. E., & Monzón, A. (2012). A GPS analysis for urban freight distribution. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39, 521–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daschkovska, K., & Scholz-Reiter B. (2011). How can electronic seals contribute to the efficiency of global container system? In: Dynamics in logistics (pp. 457–467). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, R. L., Liebe, R. M., & Bestafka, T. (2009). Risk-based decision making for terrorism applications. Risk Analysis, 29, 321–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2004). Regulation (EC) No. 725/2004 on enhancing ship and port facility security. EU Official Journal, L129, 0006–0091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finley, T., & Schuchard, R. (2011). Adapting to climate change: A guide for the transportation industry, BSR Report. http://www.bsr.org/en/our-insights/report-view/adapting-to-climate-change-a-guide-for-the-transportation-industry. Accessed 30 September 2014.

  • Frohlich, M. T., & Westbrook, R. (2001). Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies. Journal of Operations Management, 19, 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrick, B. J. (2002). Perspectives on the use of risk assessment to address terrorism. Risk Analysis, 22, 421–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunasekarana, A., Patelb, C., & McGaugheyc, R. E. (2004). A framework for supply chain performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, 87, 333–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A., & Fichtinger, J. (2013). Managing variability in ocean shipping. International Journal of Logistics Management, 24(1), 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, H., & Cheng, H. (2012). Analyzing key influence factors of city logistics development using the fuzzy decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method. African Journal of Business Management, 6, 11281–11293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMO. (2003). International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code. International Maritime Organisation, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janic, M. (2011). Assessing some social and environmental effects of transforming an airport into a real multimodal transport node. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16, 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jedermann, R., Ruiz-Garcia, L., & Lang, W. (2009). Spatial temperature profiling by semi-passive RFID loggers for perishable food transportation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 65(2), 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lammgård, C., & Andersson, D. (2014). Environmental considerations and trade-offs in purchasing of transportation services. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 10, 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latora, V., & Marchiori, M. (2001). Efficient behavior of small-world networks. Physical Review Letters, 87(19), 198701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latora, V., & Marchiori, M. (2003). Economic small-world behavior in weighted networks. The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 32(2), 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, I., Rodriguez, J., Buron, J. M., & Garcia, A. (2009). A methodology for evaluating environmental impacts of railway freight transportation policies. Energy Policy, 37, 5393–5398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macharis, C., & Bontekoning, Y. M. (2004). Opportunities for OR in intermodal freight transport research: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 153, 400–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macharis, C., Van Hoeck, E., Pekin, E., & van Lier, T. (2010). A decision analysis framework for intermodal transport: Comparing fuel price increases and the internalisation of external costs. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 44(7), 550–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. (2014). The packaging of efficiency in the development of the intermodal shipping container. Mobilities, 9, 432–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masse T., O’Neil S., & Rollins J. (2007). The Department of Homeland security’s risk assessment methodology: Evolution, issues, and options for congress. Congressional Research Service Report No. RI33858, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moura, A., & Oliveira, J. F. (2009). An integrated approach to the vehicle routing and container loading problems. OR Spectrum, 31(4), 775–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam, H. S., & Song, D. W. (2011). Defining maritime logistics hub and its implication for container port. Maritime Policy & Management, 38(3), 269–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, P. (2012). The political economy of carbon markets: The CDM and other stories. Climate Policy, 12, 135–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, A., Chen, S., Cahoon, S., Brooks, B., & Yang, Z. (2013). Climate change and the adaptation strategies of ports: The Australian experiences. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8, 186–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolanda, R. B., & Lemb, L. L. (2002). A review of the evidence for induced travel and changes in transportation and environmental policy in the US and the UK. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 7(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panayides, P. M., & Song, D. W. (2008). Evaluating the integration of seaport container terminal in supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(7), 562–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, S. A., & Apostolakis, G. E. (2007). Identification of critical locations across multiple infrastructures for terrorist actions. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 92, 1183–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rastrick, K., & Corner, J. (2010). Understanding ICT based advantages: A technosavvy case study. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 5, 305–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadegheih, A., Li, D., Sribenjachot, S., & Drake, P. R. (2010). Applying mixed integer programming for green supply chain management. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 21(2), 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saghir M. (2004, April 30–May 3). The concept of packaging logistics. In The second world conference on POM and 15th annual POM conference, Cancun, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • SteadieSeifi, M., Dellaert, N. P., Nuijten, W., Van Woensel, T., & Raoufi, R. (2014). Multimodal freight transportation planning: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 233(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thai, V. V. (2008). Service quality in maritime transport: conceptual model and empirical evidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 20(4), 493–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theofanis, S., & Boile, M. (2009). Empty marine container logistics: facts, issues and management strategies. GeoJournal, 74(1), 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toloue, R. (2014, September 29). Carbon policies targeting road transport: Is there a safety consequence? In Proceedings of European Transport Conference 2014. Frankfurt, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • USA. (2002). Maritime Transportation Security Act. http://www.tsa.gov/assets/pdf/MTSA.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2009.

  • Vickery, S. K., Jayaram, J., Droge, C., & Calantone, R. (2003). The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationship. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 523–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wamba, S. F., & Chatfield, A. T. (2009). A contingency model for creating value from RFID supply chain network projects in logistics and manufacturing environments. European Journal of Information Systems, 18(6), 615–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. H., & Cullinane, K. P. B. (2014). Traffic consolidation in East Asian container ports: A network flow analysis. Transportation Research A: Policy and Practice, 61C, 152–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., & Trbojevic, V. M. (2006). Design for safety of large marine and offshore engineering products. London, UK: Institute of Marine Engineering, Science and Technology (IMarEST).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, B., Tang, H., Guo, C., Xiu, Z., & Zhou, T. (2006). Optimization of network structure to random failures. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 368(2), 607–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, H. H. (2007). Guiding resource allocations based on terrorism risk. Risk Analysis, 27, 597–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z. L., Bonsall, S., & Wang, J. (2009). Use of fuzzy evidential reasoning in maritime security assessment. Risk Analysis, 29, 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z., Ng, A. K. Y., & Wang, J. (2013). Prioritizing security vulnerabilities in ports. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 5, 622–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z., Ng, A. K. Y., & Wang, J. (2014). Incorporating quantitative risk analysis in port facility security assessment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 59, 72–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z., Ng, A., Lee, P. T. W., Wang, T., Qu, Z., Rodrigues, V. S., Pettit, S., Harris, I., Zhang, D., & Lau, Y. T. (2017). Risk and cost evaluation of port adaptation measures to climate change impacts. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.004

  • Yeo, G. T., Pak, J. Y., & Yang, Z. (2013). Analysis of dynamic effects on seaport adopting port security. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 49, 285–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. (2012). Examining the effects of green supply chain management practices and their mediations on performance improvements. International Journal of Production Research, 50(5), 1377–1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is partially funded by the EU FP7 Marie Curie IRSES project “ENRICH” (612546).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK

    Z. Yang, J. Wang, R. Riahi & Z. Qu

  2. Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK

    Y. Wang

  3. The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

    D. Li, D. Song, P. Drake & J. E. Hernandez

  4. Molde University College, Molde, Norway

    H. Hjelle & N. Lin

  5. Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China

    X. Yan & D. Zhang

  6. Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China

    X. Shi & A. Huang

  7. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    K. Cullinane

  8. Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China

    Z. Jin & L. Shen

Authors
  1. Z. Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Y. Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H. Hjelle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. X. Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. X. Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. K. Cullinane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. D. Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. A. Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. J. Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. R. Riahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. D. Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. P. Drake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. J. E. Hernandez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Z. Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. L. Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Z. Qu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. N. Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Z. Yang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Management School, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

    Jorge E. Hernández

  2. Management School, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

    Dong Li

  3. Mexican Institute of Transportation, Pedro Escobedo, Querétaro, Mexico

    José Elias Jimenez-Sanchez

  4. Mexican Logistics & Supply Chain Association (AML), Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, San Luis Potosi, Mexico

    Miguel Gaston Cedillo-Campos

  5. School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China

    Luo Wenping

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yang, Z. et al. (2021). Challenges and Developments in Integrated Container Supply Chains: A Research Agenda for the Europe-China Research Network on Integrated Container Supply Chains (ENRICH) Project. In: Hernández, J.E., Li, D., Jimenez-Sanchez, J.E., Cedillo-Campos, M.G., Wenping, L. (eds) Collaborative Logistics and Intermodality. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50958-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation