Skip to main content

Envisioning Mixed Realities on the Flight Deck

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation (AHFE 2020)

Abstract

Conformal 3D symbology presented on a head tracked head-mounted display (HMD) has the capability to enhanced pilot situation awareness, performance and workload by providing an unlimited field of view of operational hazards. In recent years, a body of research has emerged highlighting the technical advancements (i.e. HMD encumbrance and optical enhancements) that could enable the unique capabilities and benefits of HMDs to be realized on commercial and business flight decks in the near future. The current paper provides a systematic review of the HMD-related pilot benefits (performance, workload, situational awareness, and usability) that have been reported in the literature. We conclude by highlighting the operational contexts where HMDs might enhance pilot performance, flight safety and efficiencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mulder, J.A., Van Paassen, M.M., Mulder, M.: Perspective guidance displays show the way ahead. J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun. 1(11), 428–431 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.14069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fadden, S., Ververs, P.M., Wickens, C.D.: Costs and benefits of head-up display use: a meta-analytic approach. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 1, 16–20 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129804200105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Snow, M.P., French, G.A.: Effects of primary flight symbology on workload and situation awareness in a head-up synthetic vision display. In: AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics System Conference - Proceedings, vol. 2, pp. 1–10 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/dasc.2002.1052981

  4. Fadden, S., Ververs, P.M., Wickens, C.D.: Pathway HUDs: are they viable? Hum. Factors 43(2), 173–193 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1518/001872001775900841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wickens, C.D., Alexander, A.L.: Attentional tunneling and task management in synthetic vision displays. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 19(2), 182–199 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/10508410902766549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wickens, C.D., Ward, J.: Cockpit displays of traffic and weather information: effects of 3D perspective versus 2D coplanar rendering and database integration. Int. J. Aerosp. Psychol. 27(1–2), 44–56 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yeh, M., Wickens, C.D., Seagull, F.J.: Effects of frame of reference attentional issues with helmet mounted displays (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Peinecke, N., Schmerwitz, S., Döhler, H.-U., Lüken, T.: Review of conformal displays: more than a highway in the sky. Opt. Eng. 56(5), 051406 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.oe.56.5.051406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arthur, J.T.J., et al.: Review of head-worn displays for the next generation air transportation system. Opt. Eng. 56(5), 051405 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kramer, L.J., Bailey, R.E., Ellis, K.K.E., Norman, R.M., Williams, S.P.: Enhanced and synthetic vision for terminal maneuvering area nextgen operations. In: Proceedings of SPIE (2011). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.883036

  11. R. J. Stone and F. J. Knight, “3D displays: a human-centred review. Unclassif. Bae Syst. Propr., p. 73 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mcintire, J., Mcintire, J.P., Havig, P.R., Geiselman, E.E.: Stereoscopic 3D displays and human performance: a comprehensive review Stereoscopic 3D displays and human performance: a comprehensive review. Displays 35(1), 18–26 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2013.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Arthur, J.T.J., et al.: A review of head-worn display research at NASA Langley. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 9470, pp. 1–15 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2180436

  14. Arthur, J.T.J., et al.: Performance comparison between a head-worn display system and a head-up display for low visibility commercial operations. In: Proceedings of SPIE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lorenz, B., Tobben, H., Schmerwitz, S.: Human performance evaluation of a pathway HMD. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 5802, pp. 166–176 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.603280

  16. Mulder, M.: An information-centered analysis of the tunnel-in-the-sky display part two: curved tunnel trajectories. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 13(2), 131–151 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Prinzel, L., Risser, M.: Head-Up Displays and Attention Capture, vol. 213000 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schmerwitz, S., Lueken, T., Doehler, H.-U., Peinecke, N., Ernst, J.M., da Silva Rosa, D.L.: Conformal displays: human factor analysis of innovative landing aids. Opt. Eng. 56(5), 051407 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.oe.56.5.051407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Doehler, H., Schmerwitz, S., Lueken, T.: Visual-conformal display format for helicopter guidance (2015). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2052677

  20. Schmerwitz, S., Knabl, P.M., Lueken, T., Doehler, H.-U.: Drift indication for helicopter approach and landing. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 9471, pp. 1–10 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2177816

  21. Doehler, H., Knabl, P.M., Schmerwitz, S., Eger, T., Klein, O.: Evaluation of DVE landing display formats. In: Airborne Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance (ISR) Systems and Applications IX, vol. 8360, pp. 1–12 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.922459

  22. Bailey, R.E., Arthur III, J.J., Prinzel III, L., Kramer, L.J.: Evaluation of head-worn display concepts for commercial aircraft taxi operations. In: Head- Helmet-Mounted Displays XII Design Applications, vol. 6557, p. 65570Y (2007). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.717221

  23. Arthur, J.T.J., Prinzel, L.J., et al.: Synthetic vision enhanced surface operations with head-worn display for commercial aircraft. Int. J. Aviat. 19(2), 158–181 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article is based on work performed in the programme: Open Flight Deck, which has received funding from Innovate UK programme, the UK’s Innovation Agency, with support from the UK Aerospace Technology Institute (grant reference number 113108). The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and are not intended to represent the position or opinions of the Open Flight Deck consortium or any of the individual partner organisations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Blundell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Blundell, J., Huddlestone, J., Collins, C., Scott, S., Sears, R., Plioutsias, A. (2020). Envisioning Mixed Realities on the Flight Deck. In: Stanton, N. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1212. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50943-9_62

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50943-9_62

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50942-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50943-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics