Skip to main content

Quantifying Video Gaming Expertise

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences (AHFE 2020)

Abstract

Participants’ self- report of their level of expertise in video game play (VG) is the basis for establishing a baseline of VG experience in many studies. In this study, expert players assessed participants’ actual game play and rated it based on the number of points earned in the game and the decisions they made during their game play with an included rubric. The expert rating was regressed on the self-report of the number of hours of play per week, the self-rating of video game expertise and a spatial cognition measure. The findings suggest that self-report of expertise in video game play is inaccurate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Feng, J., Spence, I., Pratt, J.: Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition. Psych. Sci. 18(10), 850–855 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Green, C.S., Bavelier, D.: Action video game experience alters the spatial resolution of vision. Psych. Sci. 18(1), 88–94 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sims, V.K., Mayer, R.E.: Domain specificity of spatial expertise: the case of video game players. Appl. Cognit. Psych. 16(1), 97–115 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kahn, A.S., Ratan, R., Williams, D.: Why we distort in self-report: Predictors of self-report errors in video game play. J. Comput. Mediat. Communi. 19(4), 1010–1023 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Latham, A.J., Patston, L.L., Tippett, L.J.: Just how expert are “expert” video-game players? Assessing the experience and expertise of video-game players across “action” video-game genres. Front. Psychol. 4, 941 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ericsson, K.A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P.J., Hoffman, R.R.: The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Maeda, Y., Yoon, S.Y.: A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured by the Purdue spatial visualization tests: visualization of rotations (PSVT: R). Ed. Psych. Rev. 25(1), 69–94 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Jo Elliott .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Rubric

Appendix: Rubric

Rating

Engagement

Reaction to contact

Unnecessary action

In a nutshell

1

Player seems to never search for the enemy. The effort is poor and ineffective, shooting inaccuracy due to a lack of aim

Player seems to never know when he gets shot, showing no reaction to the red tabs on the screen. Not reactive to explosives. Movement is stilted

Player roams aimlessly through-out the map and does weird things like go prone for no reason and crawl around often

Dies all the time

2

Player may make an attempt to search for the enemy but may have difficulties

Shooting and aiming are not precise osometimes, resulting in more deaths than kills

Player still may not respond to being shot or incoming grenades

However, the player seems to have a general understanding of how to move on the game

Player roams around aim-lessly and rarely does things that serve no purpose in killing the enemy

Dies most of the time

3

Player searches for enemy and engages the enemy. Does an average job of killing the enemy, the same amount of kills as deaths. Aiming attempts accurate shooting is often

Player on average does a decent job at reacting to being shot and locates the individual who shot him. Player tries to run away from incoming handheld explosives

Player roams around for just a little while maybe to get used to the map or controls

Dies about the same amount as kills

4

Player searches to engage the enemy and shoots before the enemy shoots back. Aiming is precise and shooting is accurate. Kills are always higher than deaths

Player discovers who shot him or her and returns fire on opponent. Player successfully runs away from handheld explosives

Player doesn’t roam around much at all or perform any weird actions

Dies sometimes

5

Player seems to know where the enemy is going to be all of the time. Player always is the first to shoot and in most cases the last to shoot. Aiming is precise and shooting is accurate and there are always way more kills with minimal deaths

Player discovers who shot him or her quickly and returns fire to kill the opponent. Player also successfully runs away from handheld explosives and sometimes will pick it up and throw it back at the enemy

Player is so good that he or she seems to already know the controls and perhaps even the map. There is no hindrance of lack of know-ledge of controls or map

Dies rarely

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Elliott, L.J. et al. (2020). Quantifying Video Gaming Expertise. In: Nazir, S., Ahram, T., Karwowski, W. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1211. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50896-8_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics