Abstract
Recent literature suggests that emigration can affect political and institutional outcomes (voting in elections, government accountability, voting for pro-democratic parties, prevalence of democracy, involvement in and tolerance of corrupt exchanges etc.) in the migrants’ countries of origin. This chapter outlines the conceptual channels through which emigration may affect institutional quality back home, highlighting Hirschman’s model of ‘Exit and Voice’, Levitt’s ‘Social Remittances’ hypothesis, and explanations related to the receipt of monetary remittances. It then reviews the growing empirical literature on the question. A common finding emerging from empirical analyses is that migrants going to countries with better governance are more likely to have a positive effect on the institutional quality back home. The chapter concludes by identifying gaps and suggesting directions for future research.
Keywords
- Migration
- Institutions
- Development
- Social remittances
- Monetary remittances
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
I acknowledge an excellent policy brief by Lodigiani (2016). I expand on her work by considering contributions from a broader range of disciplines (in particular, political science) and a broader range of institutional outcomes (in particular, corruption).
- 2.
The same effect might apply to the substantial migration into Russia from other former Soviet republics, but no empirical studies exist on that.
- 3.
The classification of autocracies here follows Geddes et al. (2014).
- 4.
The correlational evidence is also important as it reveals “stylised facts” that need to be explained.
References
Abdih, Y., Chami, R., Dagher, J., & Montiel, P. (2012). Remittances and Institutions: Are Remittances a Curse? World Development, 40(4), 657–666.
Agerpres. (2018). Romanians from Abroad Gather in Bucharest; Rally in Piata Victoriei Announced on Social Media. Retrieved fromhttps://www.agerpres.ro/english/2018/08/10/romanians-from-abroad-to-gather-in-bucharest-rally-in-piata-victoriei-announced-on-social-media%2D%2D158677
Balkaninsight. (2018). Thousands Join Romanian Diaspora Anti-corruption Protest. Retrieved from https://balkaninsight.com/2018/08/10/romanian-diaspora-rally-gathers-thousands-in-bucharest-08-10-2018/
Barsbai, T., Rapoport, H., Steinmayr, A., & Trebesch, C. (2017). The Effect of Labor Migration on the Diffusion of Democracy: Evidence from a Former Soviet Republic. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9(3), 36–69.
Bastiaens, I., & Tirone, D. C. (2019). Remittances and Varieties of Democratization in Developing Countries. Democratization, 26(7), 1132–1153.
Batista, C., Seither, J., & Vicente, P. C. (2019). Do Migrant Social Networks Shape Political Attitudes and Behavior at Home? World Development, 117, 328–343.
Batista, C., & Vicente, P. C. (2011). Do Migrants Improve Governance at Home? World Bank Economic Review, 25(1), 77–104.
Beine, M., & Sekkat, K. (2013). Skilled Migration and the Transfer of Institutional Norms. IZA Journal of Migration, 2, 9.
Berdiev, A. N., Kim, Y., & Chang, C. P. (2013). Remittances and Corruption. Economics Letters, 118(1), 182–185.
Burgess, K. (2012). Migrants, Remittances and Politics: Loyalty and Voice after Exit. Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 36(1), 43–55.
Chauvet, L., Gubert, F., & Mesplé-Somps, S. (2016). Do Migrants Adopt New Political Attitudes from Abroad? Evidence Using a Multi-sited Exit-Poll Survey During the 2013 Malian Elections. Comparative Migration Studies, 4(1), 1–31.
Chauvet, L., & Mercier, M. (2014). Do Return Migrants Transfer Political Norms to Their Origin Country? Evidence from Mali. Journal of Comparative Economics, 42(3), 630–651.
Cooray, A., & Schneider, F. (2016). Does Corruption Promote Emigration? An Empirical Examination. Journal of Population Economics, 29(1), 293–310.
Córdova, A., & Hiskey, J. (2015). Shaping Politics at Home: Cross-Border Social Ties and Local-Level Political Engagement. Comparative Political Studies, 48(11), 1454–1487.
De la Garza, R., & Hazan, M. (2003). Looking Backward, Moving Forward: Mexican Organizations in the US as Agents of Incorporation and Dissociation. The Tomas Rivera Policy Institute.
Docquier, F., Lodigiani, E., Rapoport, H., & Schiff, M. (2016). Emigration and Democracy. Journal of Development Economics, 120, 209–223.
Douarin, E.,&Radu, D. (2020). Drivers of Political Participation: Are Prospective Migrants Different? UCL Centre for Comparative Studies of Emerging Economies (CCSEE)—Working Paper Series.
Escribà-Folch, A., Meseguer, C., & Wright, J. (2015). Remittances and Democratization. International Studies Quarterly, 59(3), 571–586.
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. (2019). The Transition Report 2019–2020: Better Governance, Better Economies. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
Geddes, B., Wright, J., & Frantz, E. (2014). Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Data Set. Perspectives on Politics, 12(2), 313–331.
Goodman, G., & Hiskey, J. (2008). Exit Without Leaving: Political Disengagement in High Migration Municipalities in Mexico. Comparative Politics, 40(2), 169–188.
Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, Voice, Loyalty Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hladnik, M. (2009). From a Dollar Bill in an Envelope to a Petition to the White House: The Significance of Slovenian Migrants for Those Back Home. In U. Brunnbauer (Ed.), Transnational Societies, Trans Territorial Politics. Migrations in the (Post-)Yugoslav Region, 19th–21st Century. Munich: R. Oldenbourg Verlag.
Höckel, L. S., Santos Silva, M., & Stöhr, T. (2018). Can Parental Migration Reduce Petty Corruption in Education? World Bank Economic Review, 32(1), 109–126.
Hoffmann, B. (2010). Bringing Hirschman Back In: “Exit”, “Voice”, and “Loyalty” in the Politics of Transnational Migration. The Latin Americanist, 54(2), 57–73.
Ivlevs, A., & King, R. (2017). Does Emigration Reduce Corruption? Public Choice, 171(3–4), 389–408.
Ivlevs, A., & King, R. (2020). To Europe or Not to Europe? Migration and Public Support for Joining the European Union in the Western Balkans. International Migration Review, 54(2), 559–584.
Jones, S., & Tarp, F. (2016). Does Foreign aid Harm Political Institutions? Journal of Development Economics, 118, 266–281.
Kapur, D. (2014). Political Effects of International Migration. Annual Review of Political Science, 17, 479–502.
Karakoç, E., Köse, T., & Özcan, M. (2017). Emigration and the Diffusion of Political Salafism: Religious Remittances and Support for Salafi Parties in Egypt during the Arab Spring. Party Politics, 23(6), 731–745.
Lahiri, S., & Raimondos-Møller, P. (2000). Lobbying by Ethnic Groups and Aid Allocation. The Economic Journal, 110(462), C62–C79.
Levitt, P. (1998). Social Remittances: Migration Driven Local-Level Forms of Cultural Diffusion. International Migration Review, 32(4), 926–948.
Levitt, P. & Lamba-Nieves, D. (2011). Social Remittances Revisited. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(1), 1–22.
Lodigiani, E. (2016). The Effect of Emigration on Home-Country Political Institutions. IZA World of Labor, 2016, 307.
Mercier, M. (2016). The Return of the Prodigy Son: Do Return Migrants Make Better Leaders? Journal of Development Economics, 122, 76–91.
Merino, J.(2005). Transition to Democracy Under a Clientelistic Autocracy: Remittances in the Making of Independent Citizens in Mexico. Working Paper, APSA Annual Meeting 2005.
Miletic, A. (2009). (Extra-)Institutional Practices, Restrictions and Corruption. Emigration Policy in the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes (1918–1928). In Brunnbauer, U. (Ed.), Transnational Societies, Transterritorial Politics. Migrations in the (Post-)Yugoslav Region, 19th–21st Century. Munich: R. OldenbourgVerlag.
Pfutze, T. (2012). Does Migration Promote Democratization? Evidence from the Mexican Transition. Journal of Comparative Economics, 40(2), 159–175.
Reuters. (2018). Anti-government Protest in Romania Turns Violent. Retrieved fromhttps://www.reuters.com/article/us-romania-protests/anti-government-protest-in-romania-turns-violent-idUSKBN1KV1YO
Shain, Y., & Barth, A. (2003). Diasporas and International Relations Theory. International Organization, 57(3), 449–479.
Spilimbergo, A. (2009). Democracy and Foreign Education. American Economic Review, 99(1), 528–543.
The Guardian. (2018). Migrants Left for a Better Life. Now They Fight for a Better Romania. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/aug/22/romania-migrant-diaspora-protest-police-crackdown-corruption
Tuccio, M., Wahba, J., & Hamdouch, B. (2019). International Migration as a Driver of Political and Social Change: Evidence from Morocco. Journal of Population Economics, 32(4), 1171–1203.
Tyburski, M. D. (2012). The Resource Curse Reversed? Remittances and Corruption in Mexico. International Studies Quarterly, 56, 339–350.
Vertovec, S. (2004). Migrant Transnationalism and Modes of Transformation. International Migration Review, 38(3), 970–1001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ivlevs, A. (2021). Does Emigration Affect Political and Institutional Development in Migrants’ Countries of Origin?. In: Douarin, E., Havrylyshyn, O. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Comparative Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50888-3_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50888-3_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50887-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50888-3
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)