Skip to main content

Environmental Aspects of the Electric Vehicle

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Role of the Electric Vehicle in the Energy Transition

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to understand the complete environmental impact of Electric Vehicles (EVs) compared with traditional combustion engines (ICE). In addition, a review of how European rules have been adapting to cover these impacts is presented. Although the typical approach to the problem is based on the evaluation of the emissions during the use of vehicles, the approach presented here covers the whole life of the Vehicle (manufacturing, use of the vehicle and end of life and recycling) and estimates the amount of material and energy used, the emissions or the toxicity. Results show that EVs have an environmental impact, which is concentrated in the manufacturing phase. Compared with traditional ICEs, EVs have clearly lower emissions when driving, which is certainly critical when defining air quality policies in urban regions. The importance of coordination in environmental policies regional and worldwide is therefore required to guarantee a sustainable and fair transition to a decarbonized transportation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Colvile RN, Hutchinson EJ, Mindell JS, Warren RF (2001) The transport sector as a source of air pollution. Atmos Environ 35(9):1537–1565. ISSN 1352-2310, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00551-3

  2. Baumann H, Tillman A-M (2004) The Hitch Hiker’s Guide to LCA. In: An orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application. Lund, Sweden, Studentlitteratur

    Google Scholar 

  3. Curran MA (1996) Environmental life-cycle asessment. McGraw Hill Professional, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clift R (2006) Sustainable development and its implications for chemical engineering. Chem Eng Sci 61:4179–4187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2005.10.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Del Duce A et al (2013) ELCAR guidelines for the LCA of electric vehicles. Deliverable 2.1 of E-mobility life cycle assessment recommendations, FP7 EU Project

    Google Scholar 

  6. ReCiPe 2016 v1.1 A harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level Report I: characterization RIVM Report 2016-0104a

    Google Scholar 

  7. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:8a8ef5e8-99a0-11e5-b3b7-01aa75ed71a1.0012.02/DOC_1&format=PDF

  8. Ecoinvent Centre (2010) Ecoinvent data and reports, v2.2, Dübendorf Switzerland, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hirz M, Rossbacher P (2018) Integrated approach supporting virtual conception of passenger ergonomics in automated driving cars. In: Conference: 9th international conference on applied human factors and ergonomics—AHFE 2018 At, Orlando, USA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ellingsen LA-W, Majeau-Bettez G, Singh B et al (2014) Life cycle assessment of a lithium-ion battery vehicle pack. J Ind Ecol 18:113–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goodenough JB, Park KS (2013) The Li-ion rechargeable battery: a perspective. J Am Chem Soc 135(4):1167–1176. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja3091438

  12. IDTechEx (2014) Electric motors for electric vehicles 2013–2023: forecasts, technologies, players

    Google Scholar 

  13. Burnell (2013) Performance/cost comparison of induction-motor & permanent-magnet-motor in a hybrid electric car Malcolm Burwell. In: International Copper Association James Goss, Mircea Popescu—Motor Design Ltd, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  14. Le Petit Y (2017) Electric vehicle life cycle analysis and raw material availability. Trans Environ

    Google Scholar 

  15. Timmers VRJH, Achten PAJ (2016) Non-exhaust PM emissions from electric vehicles. Atmos Environ 134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.017

  16. Raustad R (2017) Electric vehicle life cycle cost analysis. EVTC Electric Vehicle Transportation Center

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chakraborty S, Lukasiewycz M, Buckl C, Fahmy S, Chang N, Park S, Kim Y, Leteinturier P, Adlkofer H (2012) Embedded systems and software challenges in electric vehicles. https://doi.org/10.1109/date.2012.6176508

  18. Turconi R, Boldrin A, Astrup TF (2013) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: overview, comparability and limitations Published. Renew Sustain Energy Rev Link to article. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.013

  19. Ager-Wick L, Hammer A (2017) Life cycle assessment of electric vehicles. In: 12th Concawe symposium

    Google Scholar 

  20. JRC (2017) CoM default emission factors for the member states of the European Union dataset version 2017

    Google Scholar 

  21. Notter DA, Gauch M, Widmer R et al (2010) Contribution of Li-ion batteries to the environmental impact of electric vehicles. Environ Sci Technol 44:6550–6556. https://doi.org/10.1021/es903729a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tagliaferri C et al (2016) Life cycle assessment of future electric and hybrid 1 vehicles: a cradle-to-grave systems engineering approach. Chem Eng Res Des 112:298–309 (Elsevier)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Heymans C, Walker SB, Young SB, Fowler M (2014) Economic analysis of second use electric vehicle batteries for residential energy storage and load-levelling. Energy Policy 71:22–30. ISSN 0301-4215

    Google Scholar 

  24. Casals LC, García BA, Canal C (2019) Second life batteries lifespan: rest of useful life and environmental analysis. J Environ Manag 232:354–363. ISSN 0301-4797

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vadenbo C (2009) Prospective environmental assessment of lithium recovery in battery recycling

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hawkins TR et al (2012) Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles. J Ind Ecol 17(1). https://www.pre-sustainability.com/download/Report_ReCiPe_2017.pdf

  27. Messagie M (2014) Life cycle analysis of the climate impact of electric vehicles. Transp Environ

    Google Scholar 

  28. Moro A, Lonza L (2018) Electricity carbon intensity in European member states: impacts on GHG emissions of electric vehicles. Transp Rese Part D: Transp Environ 64:5–14

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo Frías Marín .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Marín, P.F., De Miguel Perales, C. (2021). Environmental Aspects of the Electric Vehicle. In: Arcos-Vargas, A. (eds) The Role of the Electric Vehicle in the Energy Transition. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50633-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50633-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50632-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50633-9

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics