Skip to main content

Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Modernist Screenplay

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Screenwriting ((PSIS))

  • 193 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter revisits the central arguments of the book, most importantly the argument that it is possible and necessary to read screenplays from both functional and literary perspectives. It shows that the modernist screenplay could challenge and renew the practices of literary writing because of its embedment in film production, and conversely, the modernist screenplay could challenge and renew the practices of filmmaking because of its embedment in literature. The chapter argues for a pluralist approach to screenwriting, which is based on the double, functional and literary reading of scripts. It concludes with a glimpse into the history of experimental screenwriting after the advent of sound film.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The provenance of the term “emotional scenario” remains unclear. It is usually ascribed to Sergei Eisenstein with reference to his article “On Screenplay Form” (1928); however, Eisenstein does not use the word combination “emotional scenario” in the article. He writes that the screenplay “is merely a shorthand record of an emotional outburst” (1988, 134) and that it “sets out the emotional requirements” (135), but no word of an “emotional scenario.” By contrast, Viktor Shklovsky uses this exact word combination in his 1931 book How to Write Screenplays (Shklovsky 1931, 23). Thus the term most likely emerged somewhere between 1928 and 1931, but when and where exactly, I was not able to clarify.

References

  • Artaud, Antonin. 1972. Scenarios. On the Cinema. Interviews. Letters. Translated by Alastair Hamilton. Vol. 3 of Collected Works. London: Calder & Boyars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belodubrovskaya, Maria. 2016. “The Literary Scenario and the Soviet Screenwriting Tradition.” In A Companion to Russian Cinema, edited by Birgit Beumers, 251–69. Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, Sergei. 1971. Izbrannye proizvedeniia v shesti tomakh. Vol. 6. Moscow: Iskusstvo.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988. Writings: 1922–1934. Translated by Richard Taylor. Vol. 1 of Selected Works. London: British Film Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handke, Peter. 1975. Falsche Bewegung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988. “Die Helden sind die andern. Joachim von Mengerhausen spricht mit Peter Handke und Wim Wenders.” In Die Logik der Bilder: Essays und Gespräche, by Wim Wenders, edited by Michael Töteberg, 18–22. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag der Autoren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenez, Peter. 2001. “A History of Bezhin Meadow.” In Eisenstein at 100: A Reconsideration, edited by Albert J. LaValley and Barry P. Scherr, 193–206. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindlof, Thomas R. 2009. “Interpretive Communities Theory.” In [J - Y, index], Vol. 2 of Encyclopedia of Communication Theory, edited by Stephen W. Littlejohn and Karen A. Foss, 554–56. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, Ian W. 2013. Screenwriting Poetics and the Screen Idea. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manuel, J.-V. [José Viola Gamón]. 1943. Celui qui n’a pas de nom. Les pages libres de la main à plume, no. 7: n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maras, Steven. 2009. Screenwriting: History, Theory and Practice. London: Wallflower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rzheshevsky, Alexandr. 1982. Zhizn, kino. Moscow: Iskusstvo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shklovsky, Viktor. 1931. Kak pisat’ stsenarii: Posobiye dlya nachinayushchikh stsenaristov s obraztsami stsenariyev raznogo tipa. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe Izdatel’stvo Khudozhestvennoi Literatury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirk, David, and Elena Pinto Simon. 2005. “Jay Leyda and Bezhin Meadow.” In Eisenstein Rediscovered, edited by Ian Christie and Richard Taylor, 40–51. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra Ksenofontova .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ksenofontova, A. (2020). Conclusion. In: The Modernist Screenplay. Palgrave Studies in Screenwriting. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50589-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics