Advertisement

Learning Analytics and MOOCs

Conference paper
  • 782 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 12205)

Abstract

There are new discoveries in the field of educational technologies in the 21st century, which we can also call the age of technology. Learning Analytics (LA) has given itself an important research field in the area of Technology Enhanced Learning. It offers analysis, benchmarking, review and development techniques for example in online learning platforms such as those who host Massive Open Online Course (MOOC). MOOCs are online courses addressing a large learning community. Among these participants, large data is obtained from the group with age, gender, psychology, community and educational level differences. These data are gold mines for Learning Analytics. This paper examines the methods, benefits and challenges of applying Learning Analytics in MOOCs based on a literature review. The methods that can be applied with the literature review and the application of the methods are explained. Challenges and benefits and the place of learning analytics in MOOCs are explained. The useful methods of Learning Analytics in MOOCs are described in this study. With the literature review, it indicates: Data mining, statistics and mathematics, Text Mining, Semantics-Linguistics Analysis, visualization, Social network analysis and Gamification areas are implementing Learning Analytics in MOOCs allied with benefits and challenges.

Keywords

Educational technology Learning analytics MOOCs 

References

  1. 1.
    Saqr, M.: A literature review of empirical research on learning analytics in medical education. Int. J. Health Sci. 12(5), 1–6 (2018)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bahçeci, F.: Öğrenme Yönetim Sistemlerinde Kullanılan Öğrenme Analitikleri Araçlarının İncelenmesi. Turk. J. Educ. Stud. 2(1), 41–58 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chang, V., Gütl, C., Ebner, M.: Trends and opportunities in online learning, MOOCs, and cloud-based tools. In: Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Lai, K.-W. (eds.) Second Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education. SIHE, pp. 935–953. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9_64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Siemens, G.: Learning analytics the emergence of a discipline. Am. Behav. Sci.t 57(10), 1380–1400 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elias, T.: Learning analytics: definitions, processes and potential. https://landing.athabascau.ca/file/download/43713. Accessed 23 Apr 2019
  6. 6.
    Dawson, S., Joksimovic, S., Poquet, O., Siemens, G.: Increasing the impact of learning analytics. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge,https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3303784&dl=ACM&coll=DL,last. Accessed 22 Apr 2019
  7. 7.
    Khalil, M.: Learning analytics in massive open online courses. Doctoral thesis, Graz University of Technology, Graz (2018). https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/E-Learning-Using-Data-Mining-Elaal/16c4625f2e31307dd11223464b551db097c36cc4
  8. 8.
    Baturay, M.H.: An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 174, 427–433 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bozkurt, A.: Kitlesel Açık Çevrimiçi Dersler (Massive open online courses - MOOCs) ve Sayısal Bilgi Çağında Yaşamboyu Öğrenme Fırsatı. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi 1(1), 56–81 (2015)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mali, A.K.: Massive open online courses. EduInspire: Int. E-J. 3(1) 1–9 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dhar, V.: Data science and prediction. Commun. ACM 56(12), 64–73 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Piety, P.J., Behrens, J., Rea, R.: Educational data science and the need for interpretive skills. Am. Educ. Res. Assoc. 27 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    O’Reily, U.M., Veeromochoneni, K.: Technology for mining the big data of MOOCs. Res Pract. Assess. 9, 29–37 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khalil, M., Ebner, M.: What is learning analytics about? A survey of different methods used in 2013–2015. In: Smart Learning Conference Dubai, pp. 294–304 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tucker, C., Pursel, B.K., Divinsky, A.: Mining student-generated textual data in MOOCs and quantifying their effects on student performance and learning outcomes. Comput. Educ. J. 5(4), 84 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ionita, I.: Data mining techniques for e-learning. J. Appl. Comput. Sci. Math. 10(22), 26–31 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Abd Elaal, S.A.E.: E-learning using data mining. Chin.-Egypt. Res. J. (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lile, A.: Analyzing e-learning systems using educational data mining techniques. Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci. 2(3), 403–419 (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Al-Shabandar, R., Hussain, A.J., Liatsis, P., Keight, R.: Analyzing learners behavior in MOOCs: an examination of performance and motivation using a data-driven approach. IEEE Access 6, 73669–73685 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chatti, M.A., Dyckhoff, A.L., Schroeder, U., Thüs, H.: A reference model for learning analytics. Int. J. Technol. Enhanced Learn. (IJTEL) 4(5), 318–331 (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Taraghi, B., Saranti, A., Ebner, M., Schön, M.: Markov chain and classification of difficulty levels enhances the learning path in one digit multiplication. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) LCT 2014. LNCS, vol. 8523, pp. 322–333. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07482-5_31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wen, M., Yang, D., Rose, C.P.: Sentiment analysis in MOOC discussion forums: what does it tell us? In: Conference: Educational Data Mining (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dang, S., Ahmad, P.H.: Text mining: techniques and its application. IJETI Int. J. Eng. Technol. Innovations 1(4), 22–25 (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gama, S., Gonçalves, D.: Visualizing educational datamining patterns. In: Eurographics Conference on Visualization (EuroVis), United Kingdom (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Williamson, B.: Digital education governance: data visualization, predictive analytics, and ‘real-time’ policy instruments. J. Educ. Policy 31(2), 123–141 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Latha, S., Raj, M.R.C., Sukumaran, R.: Use of visualization techniques for active learning engagement in environmental science engineering courses. Int. Sch. Sci. Res. Innovation 10(4), 1340–1344 (2016)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Filva, D.A., Penalvo, F.J.G., Forment, M.A.: Social network analysis approaches for social learning support. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, Spain, pp. 269–274 (2014)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Perovic, D.: Data mining influence on e-learning. In: The Sixth International Conference on e-Learning, Serbia, Belgrade (2015)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Butts, C.T.: Social network analysis: a methodological introduction. Asian J. Soc. Psychol. 11, 13–41 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Khalil, M., Wong, J., de Koning, B.B., Ebner, M., Paas, F.: Gamification in MOOCs: a review of the state of the art. In: IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, pp. 1635–1644 (2018)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Glover, I.: Play as you learn: gamification as a technique for motivating learners, Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1078-5281,last. Accessed 22 Apr 2019
  32. 32.
    Brull, S., Finlayson, S.: Importance of gamification in increasing learning. J. Continuing Educ. Nurs. 47(8), 372–375 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., Angelova, G.: Gamification in education: a systematic mapping study. Educ. Technol. Soc. 18(3), 75–88 (2015)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Khalil, M., Taraghi, B., Ebner, M.: Engaging learning analytics in MOOCS: the good, the bad, and the ugly. In: International Conference on Education and New Developments (2016)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chang, G., Healey, M., McHugh, J.A.M., Wang, T.L.: Mining the World Wide Web An Information Search Approach. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston (2001)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sundari, J.G., Sundae, D.: A study of various text mining techniques. Int. J. Adv. Netw. Appl. (IJANA) 8(5), 82–85 (2017)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pardos, Z.A., Horodyskyj, L.: Analysis of student behaviour in habitable worlds using continuous representation visualization. J. Learn. Anal. 6(1), 1–15 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Müller, T.: Social network analysis: a practical method to improve knowledge sharing, hands-on knowledge co-creation and sharing; practical methods and techniques. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1467609. Accessed 25 Apr 2019
  39. 39.
    Morschheuser, B., Hassan, L., Werder, K., Hamari, J.: How to design gamification? A method for engineering gamified software. Inf. Softw. Technol. 95, 219–237 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chea, C.: Benefits and challenges of massive open online courses. ASEAN J. Open Distance Learn. 8(1), 16–23 (2016)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Manderveld, J.: Grand challenges for learning analytics and open & online education. In: Open and Online Education, pp. 70–74 (2015)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Avella, J.T., Kebrithchi, M., Nunn, S.G., Knai, T.: Learning analytics methods, benefits, and challenges in higher education: a systematic literature review. Online Learn. 20(2), 13–29 (2016)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ebner, M., Pronegg, M.: Use of learning analytics applications in mathematics with elementary learners. Int. J. Acad. Res. Educ. 1(2), 26–39 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mukala, P., Buijs, J.C.A.M., Van Der Aalst, W.M.P.: Exploring students’ learning behaviour. In: Moocs Using Process Mining Techniques, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, pp. 179–196 (2015)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tucker, C., Pursel, B.K.: Mining student-generated textual data in MOOCs and quantifying their effects on student performance and learning outcomes. ASEE Comput. Educ. (CoED) J. 4(5), 84 (2014)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zhang, T., Yuan, B.: Visualizing MOOC user behaviors: a case study on XuetangX. In: Yin, H., Gao, Y., Li, B., Zhang, D., Yang, M., Li, Y., Klawonn, F., Tallón-Ballesteros, Antonio J. (eds.) IDEAL 2016. LNCS, vol. 9937, pp. 89–98. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46257-8_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kellogg, S., Booth, S., Oliver, K.: A social network perspective on peer supported learning in MOOCs for educators. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 15(5), 263–289 (2014)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Vaibhav, A., Gupta, P.: Gamification of Moocs for increasing user engagement. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on MOOC, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE), pp. 290–295 (2014)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ferguson, R.: Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. Int. J. Technol. Enhanced Learn. 4(5/6), 304–317 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Clow, D.: An overview of learning analytics. Teach. High. Educ. 18(6), 683–695 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Educational TechnologyGraz University of TechnologyGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations