Abstract
Technology-assisted behaviour awareness and change is on the rise. Examples include apps and sites for fitness, healthy eating, mental health and smoking cessation. These information systems recreated principles of influence and persuasion in a digital form allowing real-time observation, interactivity and intervention. Peer support groups are one of the behavioural influence techniques which showed various benefits, including hope installation and relapse prevention. However, unmoderated groups may become a vehicle for comparisons and unmanaged interactions leading to digression, normalising the negative behaviour and lowering self-esteem. A typical requirement of such groups is to be of a social and supportive nature whereas moderation, through humans or artificial agents, may face a risk of being seen as centralised and overly managed governance approach. In this paper, we explore the requirements and different preferences about moderators as seen by members. We follow a mixed-method approach consisting of a qualitative phase that included two focus groups and 16 interviews, followed by a quantitative phase, including a survey with 215 participants who declared having well-being issues. We report on the qualitative phase findings achieved through thematic analysis. We also report and discuss the survey results studying the role of gender, self-control, personality traits, culture, the perception of usefulness and willingness to join the group as predictors of the members’ expectations from moderators, resulted from the qualitative phase.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Taherdoost, H.: A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Proc. Manuf. 22, 960–967 (2018)
Olson, J.M., Ross, M.: False feedback about placebo effectiveness - consequences for the misattribution of speech anxiety. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 24(4), 275–291 (1988)
Hunt, T.J.: Leader-member exchange relationships in health information management. Perspect Health Inf. Manag. 11(Spring) (2014)
Imhoff, R., Erb, H.P.: What motivates nonconformity? Uniqueness seeking blocks majority influence. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 35(3), 309–320 (2009)
Schafer, M., Crichlow, S.: Antecedents of groupthink: a quantitative study. J. Conflict Resolut. 40(3), 415–435 (1996)
Zajonc, R.B.: Social facilitation. Science 149, 269–274 (1965)
Platania, J., Moran, G.P.: Social facilitation as a function of the mere presence of others. J. Soc. Psychol. 141(2), 190–197 (2001)
Crisp, R.J., Turner, R.N.: Essential Social Psychology, vol. 4th. SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd., Thousand Oaks (2017). pages cm
Dai, S.L., Li, Y.C., Zhang, W.: Personality traits of entrepreneurial top management team members and new venture performance. Soc. Behav. Pers. 47(7), 15 (2019)
Stamkou, E., van Kleef, G.A., Homan, A.C.: Feeling entitled to rules: entitled individuals prevent norm violators from rising up the ranks. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 84(1), 10 (2019)
Hofstede Insights. Compare countries (2019). https://www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries/. Accessed 28 April 2019
Scholl, A., Sassenberg, K., Ellemers, N., Scheepers, D., De Wit, F.: Highly identified power-holders feel responsible: the interplay between social identification and social power within groups. Brit. J. Soc. Psychol. 57(1), 112–129 (2018)
Delrue, J., Soenens, B., Morbée, S., Vansteenkiste, M., Haerens, L.: Do athletes’ responses to coach autonomy support and control depend on the situation and athletes’ personal motivation? Psychol. Sport Exerc. 43, 321–332 (2019)
Matud, M.a.P., Ibañez, I., Bethencourt, J.M., Marrero, R., Carballeira, M.: Structural gender differences in perceived social support. Pers. Individ. Differ. 35(8), 1919–1929 (2003)
Strom, J., Høybye, M.T., Laursen, M., Jørgensen, L.B., Nielsen, C.V.: Lumbar spine fusion patients’ use of an internet support group: mixed methods study. J. Med. Internet Res. 21(7), 17 (2019)
van Zomeren, M., Louis, W.R.: Culture meets collective action: exciting synergies and some lessons to learn for the future. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 20(3), 277–284 (2017)
Henrich, J., Heine, S.J., Norenzayan, A.: The weirdest people in the world? Behav. Brain Sci. 33(2–3), 61–83 (2010)
Suler, J.: The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 7(3), 321–326 (2004)
Ciocarlan, A., Masthoff, J., Oren, N.: Kindness is contagious: study into exploring engagement and adapting persuasive games for wellbeing. In: Proceedings of the 26th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, pp. 311–319. ACM, July 2018
Rajani, N.B., Weth, D., Mastellos, N., Filippidis, F.T.: Use of gamification strategies and tactics in mobile applications for smoking cessation: a review of the UK mobile app market. BMJ Open 9(6), e027883 (2019)
McKay, F.H., Wright, A., Shill, J., Stephens, H., Uccellini, M.: Using health and well-being apps for behavior change: a systematic search and rating of apps. JMIR mHealth uHealth 7(7), e11926 (2019)
Alrobai, A., Algashami, A., Dogan, H., Corner, T., Phalp, K., Ali, R.: COPE.er method: combating digital addiction via online peer support groups. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 16(7), 1162 (2019)
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Terry, G.: Thematic analysis. Qual. Res. Clin. Health Psychol. 24, 95–114 (2014)
Matthews, J., Win, K.T., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Freeman, M.: Persuasive technology in mobile applications promoting physical activity: a systematic review. J. Med. Syst. 40(3), 72 (2016)
Orji, R., Mandryk, R.L.: culturally relevant design guidelines for encouraging healthy eating behavior. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 72(2), 207–223 (2014)
Orji, R., Mandryk, R.L., Vassileva, J.: Gender, age, and responsiveness to Cialdini’s persuasion strategies. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9072, pp. 147–159. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_14
Alkış, N., Temizel, T.T.: The impact of individual differences on influence strategies. Pers. Individ. Differ. 87, 147–152 (2015)
Ciocarlan, A., Masthoff, J., Oren, N.: Kindness is contagious: exploring engagement in a gamified persuasive intervention for wellbeing. In: PGW@ CHI PLAY (2017)
Lowensteyn, I., Berberian, V., Berger, C., Da Costa, D., Joseph, L., Grover, S.A.: The Sustainability of a workplace wellness program that incorporates gamification principles: participant engagement and health benefits after 2 years. Am. J. Health Promot. 33(6), 850–858 (2019)
Cialdini, R.: Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion
Rammstedt, B., John, O.P.: Measuring personality in one minute or less: a 10-item short version of the big five inventory in English and German. J. Res. Pers. 1(41), 203–212 (2007)
Tangney, J.P., Baumeister, R.F., Boone, A.L.: High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. J. Pers. 2(72), 271–324 (2004)
Maro, S., Sundklev, E., Persson, C.-O., Liebel, G., Steghöfer, J.-P.: Impact of gamification on trace link vetting: a controlled experiment. In: Knauss, E., Goedicke, M. (eds.) REFSQ 2019. LNCS, vol. 11412, pp. 90–105. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15538-4_6
Barn, Balbir S., Barn, R.: Human and value sensitive aspects of mobile app design: a foucauldian perspective. In: Krogstie, J., Reijers, Hajo A. (eds.) CAiSE 2018. LNCS, vol. 10816, pp. 103–118. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91563-0_7
Haake, P., et al.: Configurations of user involvement and participation in relation to information system project success. In: Krogstie, J., Reijers, Hajo A. (eds.) CAiSE 2018. LNCS, vol. 10816, pp. 87–102. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91563-0_6
Aldhayan, M., Cham, S., Kostoulas, T., Almourad, M.B., Ali, R.: Online peer support groups to combat digital addiction: user acceptance and rejection factors. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Reis, L.P., Costanzo, S. (eds.) WorldCIST’19 2019. AISC, vol. 932, pp. 139–150. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16187-3_14
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Aldhayan, M., Naiseh, M., McAlaney, J., Ali, R. (2020). Online Peer Support Groups for Behavior Change: Moderation Requirements. In: Dalpiaz, F., Zdravkovic, J., Loucopoulos, P. (eds) Research Challenges in Information Science. RCIS 2020. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 385. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50316-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50316-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50315-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50316-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)