Advertisement

Gender and Genre Differences in Multiplayer Gaming Motivations

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 12211)

Abstract

This study examines gaming motivations for two different genres of multiplayer games—casual social network games (SNGs) and massively multiplayer online (MMO) games—and tests for gender differences in motivation after considering genre. We conducted a survey of 515 SNG players and 505 MMO players in the U.S. through Mechanical Turk, asking about their motivations for play and basic gaming behavior such as frequency and length of play. Using a self-determination theory approach to categorize motivations, we looked at how game genre and gender are associated with six types of motivation. We find that hypotheses of gender differences from previous games research are contradicted or unsupported—for example, female players for both SNGs and MMOs reported higher levels of external game regulation than males, contradicting previous studies of men being more achievement oriented than women. There are also major genre differences in relation to different motivations. Results reflect a cultural shift in gaming away from gender stereotypes, supporting the importance of reconsidering previous scholarship in this area. Future research should account for both the affordances and culture associated with different game genres rather than generalizing gender effects to all games.

Keywords

Multiplayer games Gender Genre Motivation 

References

  1. Bialas, M., Tekofsky, S., Spronck, P.: Cultural influences on play style. In: 2014 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games, pp. 1–7. IEEE, August 2014Google Scholar
  2. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., Gosling, S.D.: Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 6(1), 3–5 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cassell, J., Jenkins, H. (eds.): From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and Computer Games. Cambridge, MIT Press (1998)Google Scholar
  4. Casual Games Association: Casual Games Association report (2012)Google Scholar
  5. Deci, E.L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B.C., Leone, D.R.: Facilitating internalization: the self-determination theory perspective. J. Pers. 62(1), 119–142 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deci, E.L., Koestner, R., Ryan, R.M.: A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol. Bull. 125(6), 627–68–700 (1999). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10589297
  7. Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: A motivational approach to self: integration in personality. In: Dienstbier, R. (ed.) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Perspectives on Motivation, vol. 38. University of Nebraska Press (1991). http://www.mendeley.com/research/a-motivational-approach-to-self-integration-in-personality/
  8. De Grove, F., Breuer, J., Hsueh Hua Chen, V., Quandt, T., Ratan, R., Van Looy, J.: Validating the digital games motivation scale for comparative research between countries. Commun. Res. Rep. 34(1), 37–47 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Entertainment Software Association: Essential facts about the computer and video game industry (2017). http://essentialfacts.theesa.com/mobile/
  10. Fox, J., Tang, W.Y.: Sexism in online video games: the role of conformity to masculine norms and social dominance orientation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 33, 314–320 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fuster, H., Oberst, U., Griffiths, M., Carbonell, X., Chamarro, A., Talarn, A.: Psychological motivation in online role-playing games: a study of Spanish World of Warcraft players. Anales de Psicología/Ann. Psychol. 28(1), 274–280 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. Gardner, B., Lally, P.: Does intrinsic motivation strengthen physical activity habit? Modeling relationships between self-determination, past behaviour, and habit strength. J. Behav. Med. 36, 488–497 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-012-9442-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hamari, J., Tuunanen, J.: Player types: A metasynthesis. Trans. Digit. Games Res. Assoc. 1(2), 29–53 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. Hartmann, T., Klimmt, C.: Gender and computer games: Exploring females’ dislikes. J. Comput.-Mediated Commun. 11(4), 910–931 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. Heeter, C.: Playstyles and learning styles. In Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education. IGI Global (2008). http://gel.msu.edu/carrie/publications/playstyleANDlearninghandbook2008.pdf
  16. Kahn, A.S., et al.: The Trojan Player Typology: a cross-genre, cross-cultural, behaviorally validated scale of video game play motivations, 354–361 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.018
  17. Kaye, L.K., Pennington, C.R.: ‘Girls can’t play’: the effects of stereotype threat on females’ gaming performance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 59, 202–209 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lafrenière, M.A.K., Verner-Filion, J., Vallerand, R.J.: Development and validation of the gaming motivation scale (GAMS). Personality Individ. Differ. 53(7), 827–831 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee, Y.-H., Wohn, D.Y.: Are there cultural differences in how we play? Examining cultural effects on playing social network games. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(4), 1307–1314 (2012). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563212000568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lehdonvirta, V., Ratan, R., Kennedy, T.L.M., Williams, D.: Pink and blue pixel$: gender and economic disparity in two massive online games. Inf. Soc. 30, 243–255 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2014.915277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Levesque, C., Copeland, K.J., Sutcliffe, R.A.: Conscious and nonconscious processes: implications for self-determination theory. Can. Psychol. 49(3), 218–224 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shen, C., Ratan, R., Leavitt, A., Cai, Y.D.: Do men advance faster than women? Debunking the gender performance gap in two massively multiplayer online games. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 21, 312–329 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lucas, K., Sherry, J.L.: Sex differences in video game play: a communication-based explanation. Commun. Res. 31(5), 499–523 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650204267930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Markland, D., Tobin, V.: A modification of the behavioral regulation in exercise questionnaire to include an assessment of amotivation. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 26, 191–196 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nagygyörgy, K., et al.: Typology and sociodemographic characteristics of massively multiplayer online game players. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 29, 192–200 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Niederle, M., Vesterlund, L.: Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much?. Q. J. Econ. 122(3), 1067–1101 (2007)Google Scholar
  27. Omori, M.T., Felinto, A.S.: Analysis of motivational elements of social games: a puzzle match 3-games study case. Int. J. Comput. Games Technol. 2012, 9 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Przybylski, A.K., Rigby, C.S., Ryan, R.M.: A motivational model of video game engagement. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 14, 154–166 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019440
  29. Quantic Foundry: Beyond 50/50: Breaking Down The Percentage of Female Gamers by Genre (2017). http://quanticfoundry.com/2017/01/19/female-gamers-by-genre/
  30. Ratan, R., Taylor, N., Hogan, J., Kennedy, T.L.M., Williams, D.: Stand by your man: an examination of gender disparity in League of Legends. Games Cult. 10, 438–462 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412014567228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Richard, G.T., Hoadley, C.M.: Investigating a supportive online gaming community as a means of reducing stereotype threat vulnerability across gender. In: Proceedings of Games, Learning & Society 9.0, pp. 261–266. ETC Press (2013)Google Scholar
  32. Ryan, R., Deci, E.: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25, 54–67 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ryan, R.M., Rigby, C.S., Przybylski, A.: The motivational pull of video games: a self-determination theory approach. Motiv. Emot. 30(4), 344–360 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9051-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shapiro, D.N., Chandler, J., Mueller, P.A.: Using Mechanical Turk to study clinical populations. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 1, 213–220 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702612469015
  35. Steele, C.M., Aronson, J.: Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69(5), 797 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sung, J., Bjornrud, T., Lee, Y., Wohn, D.Y.: Social network games: audience traits. In: Proceedings of the 28th of the International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA 2010, pp. 3649–3654. ACM Press, New York (2010). http://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1754033
  37. Vallerand, R., Bissonnette, R.: Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational styles as predictors of behavior: a prospective study. J. Pers. 60(3), 599–620 (1992). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00922.x/abstractCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vandegrift, D., Brown, P.M.: Gender differences in the use of high-variance strategies in tournament competition. J. Socio-Econ. 34, 834–849 (2005)Google Scholar
  39. Van Reijmersdal, E.A., Jansz, J., Peters, O., Van Noort, G.: Why girls go pink: game character identification and game-players’ motivations. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(6), 2640–2649 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vermeulen, L., Castellar, E.N., et al.: Challenging the other: exploring the role of opponent gender in digital game competition for female players. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 17, 303–309 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Williams, D., Yee, N., Caplan, S.E.: Who plays, how much, and why? Debunking the stereotypical gamer profile. J. Comput.-Mediated Commun. 13, 993–1018 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00428.x
  42. Wohn, D.Y.: From faux-social to pro-social: the mediating role of copresence in developing expectations of social support in a game. Presence Teleop. Virt. Environ. 25(1), 61–74 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wohn, D.Y., Lampe, C., Wash, R., Ellison, N., Vitak, J.: The “S” in social network games: initiating, maintaining, and enhancing relationships. In: 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10. IEEE (2011). http://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.400
  44. Wohn, D.Y., Lee, Y., Sung, J., Bjornrud, T.: Building common ground and reciprocity through social network games. In: Proceedings of the 28th of the International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA 2010, pp. 4423–4428. ACM Press, New York (2010). http://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1754164
  45. Wohn, D.Y., Lee, Y.-H.: Players of Facebook games and how they play. Entertain. Comput. 4(3), 171–178 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2013.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yee, N.: Motivations for play in online games. CyberPsychol. Behav. 9, 772–775 (2006a). http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yee, N.: The demographics, motivations, and derived experiences of users of massively multi-user online graphical environments. Presence Teleop. Virt. Environ. 15, 309–329 (2006b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yee, N.: As gamers age, the appeal of competition drops the most. strategy is the most age-stable motivation. Quantic Foundry (2016). http://quanticfoundry.com/2016/02/10/gamer-generation/
  49. Yee, N., Ducheneaut, N., Nelson, L.: Online gaming motivations scale: development and validation. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2803–2806. ACM (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New Jersey Institute of TechnologyNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Michigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations