Abstract
Urban education needs a set of conceptual tools that go beyond the simple description of particular urban phenomena, give due acknowledgement to macro-level forces, and also explore local variations in urban contexts that have the potential to expose local possibilities for action. This chapter articulates a newly synthesised discursive conceptual argument about what urban education might mean and how such an argument should become a central way of understanding some of the similar and yet distinct dynamics of education in urban contexts. In essence the broad argument developed in this chapter details a theory of the urban that appreciates the global dynamics of urban processes but does so through a historically and locally understood and articulated sense of place. Then such thinking is embedded in our critique of much of the urban education research literature and is exemplified through an exploration of our thinking with regard to a recent empirical study of young people’s educational aspirations in two urban contexts in Wales, a constituent country of the UK. Building on our exemplified theory of urban education developed in this chapter, we then explore in brief and schematic ways how such thinking might contribute to the challenges and possibilities of education in Central Asia documented in this book. We do so by focusing on educational pathways to labour market transitions in the city of Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, as a particular case in point. In summary, the chapter argues for the importance of foundational urban theorising, appropriately contextualised, as a way of understanding the social, economic, and cultural foundations upon which young people and urban schooling operate.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The authors of this chapter work in the Disadvantage and Poverty Research Group at the Manchester Institute of Education, a group that is also affiliated to the Manchester Urban Institute’s Spatial Inequalities and Poverty signature theme.
- 2.
The argument about differently constituted experiences of urban place, identity, and diversity is well documented by Allen and Hollingworth (2013). In many respects, such research, and our own thinking, critique Beck’s argument (2011) that we need to move wholesale conceptually and methodologically from analytical notions of essential grouped identities linked to multiculturalism to methodological cosmopolitanism. What Beck perhaps fails to recognise is how urban theory can account for analytical differences in diversity generated by the differences in urban processes.
References
Ainscow, M., & West, M. (Eds.). (2006). Improving urban schools: Leadership and collaboration. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Allen, K., & Hollingworth, S. (2013). ‘Sticky subjects’ or ‘cosmopolitan creatives’? Social class, place and urban young people’s aspirations for work in the knowledge economy. Urban Studies, 50(3), 499–517.
Archer, L., Hollingworth, S., & Mendrick, H. (2010). Urban youth and schooling. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Godec, S., King, H., Mau, A., Nomikou, E., & Seakins, A. (2018). Using Bourdieu in practice? Urban secondary teachers’ and students’ experiences of a Bourdieusian-inspired pedagogical approach. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39(3), 283–298.
Ball, S. J. (2003). Class strategies and the educational market: The middle classes and social advantage. London: Routledge Falmer.
Baumann, A., Jansova, E., Saar, E. (2013). Transition from school to work in Kyrgyzstan: Results of the 2011/12 transition survey, European training foundation report. https://www.etf.europa.eu/sites/default/files/m/F468B191CAD95B8BC1257BBE005530DF_School-to-work%20transition_Kyrgyzstan.pdf. Accessed 9 Sept 2018.
Beck, U. (2011). Multiculturalism or cosmopolitanism: How can we describe and understand the diversity of the world? Social Sciences in China, 32(4), 52–58.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education (Society and culture). London: Sage.
Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2015). Towards a new epistemology of the urban. City, 19, 151–182.
Brighouse, T., & Fullick, L. (Eds.). (2007). Education in a global city. Essays from London. London: Institute of Education.
Bright, G. (2011). ‘Non-servile virtuosi’ in insubordinate spaces: School disaffection, refusal and resistance in a former English coalfield. European Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2011.10.4.502.
Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Campbell, C., & Whitty, G. (2007). Urban education in the United Kingdom: Section editors introduction. In G. Noblit & W. Pink (Eds.), International handbook of urban education (Springer international handbooks of education) (Vol. 19, pp. 929–942). Dordrecht: Springer.
Castells, M. (1972). La question urbaine. Paris: Maspero.
Cochrane, A. (2006). Understanding urban policy: A critical introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cremin, T., Mottram, M., Collins, F., & Drury, R. (2015). Researching literacy lives: Building communities between home and school. Oxford: Routledge.
DeLanda, M. (2002). Intensive science and virtual philosophy. London: Continuum.
Dillabough, J., & Kennelly, J. (2010). Lost youth in the global city: Class, culture and the urban imaginary. London: Routledge.
Donati, P., & Archer, M. (2015). The relational subject. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dreier, O. (2008). Learning in structures of social practice. In S. Brinkmann, C. Elmholdt, G. Kraft, P. Musaeus, K. Nielsen, & L. Tanggaard (Eds.), A qualitative stance: Essays in honor of Steinar Kvale (pp. 85–96). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
Dreier, O. (2011). Personality and the conduct of everyday life. Nordic Psychology, 63(2), 4–23.
Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2004). Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In J. V. Henderson & J.-F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Evans, C. (2016). Framing young people’s educational transitions: The role of local and contemporary economic contexts. British Journal of Sociology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2016.1150154.
Gonzalez, N., Moll, L., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorising practices in households, communities and classroom. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Government Statistical Service. (2016). Guide to applying the 2011 rural urban classification to data. London: DEFRA.
Grace, G. (Ed.). (1984). Education and the city. Abingdon: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Grace, G. (2006). Urban education: Confronting the contradictions: An analysis with special reference to London. London Review of Education, 4(2), 115–131.
Grace, G. (2007). Urban education theory revisited: From the urban question to the end of the millennium. In G. Noblit & W. Pink (Eds.), International handbook of urban education (Springer international handbooks of education) (Vol. 19, pp. 959–978). Dordrecht: Springer.
Gulson, K., & Symes, C. (2007). Knowing one's place: Space, theory, education. Critical Studies in Education, 48(1), 97–110.
Harvey, D. (1973). Social justice and the city. London: Edward Arnold.
Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. London: Verso.
Hodgson, A., & Spours, K. (2013). An ecological analysis of the dynamics of localities: A 14+ low opportunity progression equilibrium in action. Journal of Education and Work. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2013.80518.
Hubbard, P., Kitchin, R., & Valentine, G. (2004). Editors’ introduction. In P. Hubbard, R. Kitchin, & G. Valentine (Eds.), Key thinkers on space and place (pp. 1–15). London: Sage.
Jackson, P. (1989). Geography, race and racism. In R. Peet & N. Thrift (Eds.), New models in geography (Vol. 2). London: Unwin Hymen.
Kerr, K., Dyson, A., & Raffo, C. (2014). Education, disadvantage and place: Making the local matter. Bristol: Policy Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lefebvre, H. (1970). La révolution urbaine. Paris: Gallimard.
Levin, B. (2008). How to change 5000 schools: A practical and positive approach for leading change at every level. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
Lipman, P. (2004). High stakes education. London: Routledge Falmer.
Lipman, P. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the City. New York: Routledge.
Lipman, P. (2013). Economic crisis, accountability, and the state’s coercive assault on public education in the USA. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 557–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2012.758816.
Lupton, R. (2016). Re-thinking values and schooling in white working class neighbourhoods. In C. Timmerman, N. Clycq, M. McAndrew, B. Alhassane, L. Braeckmans, & S. Mels (Eds.), Youth in education: The necessity of valuing ethnocultural diversity (pp. 233–248). New York: Routledge.
Maguire, M., Wooldridge, T., & Pratt-Adams, S. (2006). The urban primary school. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Massey, D. (1991). Flexible sexism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 9(1), 31–57.
McFarlane, C. (2011). Assemblage and critical urbanism. City, 15(2), 204–224.
Mould, O. (2015). A limitless urban theory? A response to Scott and Storper’s ‘the nature of cities: The scope and limits of urban theory’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12288.
Noblit, G., & Pink, W. (2007). Introduction: Urban education in the globalizing world. In G. W. Noblit & W. T. Pink (Eds.), International handbook of urban education (Vol. 19, pp. xv–xxxvi). Dordrecht: Springer.
Ofsted (2013). Unseen children: Educational access and achievement 20 years on: Evidence report.. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/unseen-children-access-and-achievement-20-years-on. Accessed 18 Oct 2018.
Park, R. E., Burgess, E. W., & McKenzie, R. D. (1925). The city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Phillips, D. (2005). Policy borrowing in education: Frameworks for analysis. In J. Zajda (Ed.), International handbook on globalisation, education and policy research (pp. 23–34). Dordrecht: Springer.
Pink, W. T., & Noblit, G. W. (2017). Globalised urban education: Tracking change. In W. T. Pink & G. W. Noblit (Eds.), Second international handbook of urban education (pp. li–lxvi). Dordrecht: Springer.
Pinoncely, V. (2014). Poverty, place and inequality: Why place-based approaches are key to tackling poverty and inequality. Policy paper RTBI, Scotland. http://www.rtpi.org.uk/media/1811222/poverty_place_and_inequality.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2018.
Raffo, C. (2011). Educational equity in poor urban contexts: Exploring issues of place/space and young People's identity and agency. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(1), 1–19.
Raffo, C. (2014). Improving educational equity in urban contexts. Abingdon: Routledge.
Raffo, C., & Dyson, A. (2007). Full service extended schools and educational inequality in urban contexts--new opportunities for progress? Journal of Education Policy, 22(5), 263–282.
Raffo, C., Dyson, A., Kerr, K. (2014). Positive discrimination in European education and training systems--lessons from the implementation of area-based initiatives for policy and practice (an independent report authored for the European Commission by the NESET network of experts). http://www.nesetweb.eu/news/neset-report-lessons-area-based-initiatives-education-and-training. Accessed 18 Oct 2018.
Reay, D., Crozier, G., & James, D. (2011). White middle-lass identities and urban schooling. Basingstoke: Palgrame Macmillan.
Rees, G., Power, S., & Taylor, C. (2007). The governance of educational inequalities: The limits of area-based initiatives. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 9(3), 261–274.
Roberts, K., Kamruzzaman, P., & Tholen, J. (2009). Young people’s education to work transitions and inter-generational social mobility in post-soviet Central Asia. Nordic Journal of Youth Research, 17(1), 59–80.
Roth, W.-M. (2016). Concrete human psychology. New York: Routledge.
Rubery, J., Johnson, M., Lupton, R., Zapata Roman, G. (2017). Human development report for Greater Manchester. http://www.research.mbs.ac.uk/ewerc/Portals/0/Documents/human-development-report.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2018.
Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.
Sassen, S. (1991). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Schröder, P. (2016). Urban spaces and lifestyles in Central Asia and beyond: An introduction. Central Asian Survey, 35(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2016.1155862.
Scott, A. J., & Storper, M. (2015). The nature of cities: The scope and limits of urban theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(1), 1–15.
Spicker, P. (2001). Poor areas and the 'ecological fallacy'. Radical Statistics, 76(Winter). http://www.radstats.org.uk/no076/spicker.htm. Accessed 18 Oct 2018.
Spivak, G. C. (2008). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Macmillan: Basingstoke.
Storper, M., & Scott, A. J. (2016). Current debates in urban theory: A critical assessment. Urban Studies, 53(6), 1114–1136.
Taylor, I., Evans, K., & Fraser, P. (1996). A tale of two cities: Global change, local feeling and everyday life in the North of England. A Study in Manchester and Sheffield. London: Routledge.
Thomson, P. (2002). Schooling the rustbelt kids: Making the difference in changing times. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
Thrupp, M., & Lupton, R. (2006). Taking school contexts more seriously: The social justice challenge. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(3), 308–328.
Townsend, T. (Ed.). (2007). International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement: Review, reflection and reframing. Dordrecht: Springer.
Waldinger, R., & Bozorgmehr, M. (Eds.). (1996). Ethnic Los Angeles. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Wessendorf, S. (2016). Settling in a super-diverse context: Recent migrants’ experiences of conviviality. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 37(5), 449–463.
Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, S., Dodd, L. J., Steele, C., & Randall, R. (2015). A systematic review of current understandings of employability. Journal of Education and Work. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2015.1102210.
Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 1–24.
Acknowledgements
Our gratitude goes to Ruth Lupton, Helen Gunter, Wolff-Michael Roth, Kevin Ward, Philipp Schröder, and Denise Egéa for their perceptive comments on earlier drafts of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Raffo, C., Kerr, K., Dyson, A. (2020). Urban Education: Challenges and Possibilities. In: Egéa, D. (eds) Education in Central Asia. Education, Equity, Economy, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50127-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50127-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50126-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50127-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)