Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Politics and Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Theoretical Approaches to Economic Growth and Development

Abstract

This chapter, analyzes the relationship between politics and political institutions and how it affects the economic outcomes. Thus, the relationship between policy decision-making and income distribution explains how structural reforms and political costs have a major impact on policymaking by governments. In order to address the issue more thoroughly, the analysis follows the relationship of democracy and the economic system, the role of elites and pressure groups in policymaking and the interconnection of politics with the cultural background and the role of the media as behavior shaping factors. Finally, the concept of state resilience is described and how it relates to a well-functioning society. Also, the major political upheavals in the world over the last decades are analyzed, with particular reference to the main change in the relative position of the middle class in the world and the rise of populist policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acemoglu, D. (2005). Politics and economics in weak and strong states. Journal of Monetary Economics, 52, 1199–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D. (2008). Political economy of institutions and development: Lecture 1. Retrieved from web.mit.edu/14.773/www/2003%20Class%20notes.pdf.

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J. A., & Yared, P. (2008). Income and democracy. American Economic Review, 98(3), 808–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., Naidu, S., Restrepo, P., & Robinson, J. A. (2013). Democracy, redistribution and inequality (NBER Working Paper, No. 19746).

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2000). Why did the west extend the franchise? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 1167–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., Suresh, N., Restrepo, P., & Robinson, J. A. (2014). Democracy does cause growth (NBER Working Paper, No. 20004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & Glaeser, E. L. (2004). Fighting poverty in the US and Europe: A world of difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1996). Income distribution, political instability and investment. European Economic Review, Elsevier, 40(6), 1203–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & Roubini, N. (1992). Political cycles in OECD economies. Review in Economics Studies I, 59, 663–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Ozler, S., Roubini, N., & Swagel, P. (1996). Political instability and economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 189–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1989). A cross country study of growth, saving and government (NBER Working Paper, No. 2855).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, CVI(425), 407–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1996). Democracy and growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1999). Determinants of democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 107(S6), 158–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonfiglioli, A., & Gancia, G. (2011). The political cost of reforms (CEPR Discussion Paper, 8421).

    Google Scholar 

  • Borner, S., Brunetti, A., & Weder, B. (1995). Political credibility and economic development. New York: Macmillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butkiewicz, J., & Yanikkaya, H. (2006). Institutional quality and economic growth: Maintenance of the rule of law or democratic institutions, or both. Economic Modeling, 23, 648–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervellati, M., & Fortunato, P. (2004). Growth and endogenous political institutions. Retrieved from www2.dse.unibo.it/…/Endogenous%20Political%20Institutions_MIT_DP2004.pdf.

  • Coates, D., & Heckelman, J. C. (2003). Interest groups and investment: A further test of the Olson hypothesis. Public Choice, 117, 333–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, D., Heckelman, J. C., & Wilson, B. (2007). Determinants of interest group formation. Public Choice, 133, 377–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dao, M., Das, M., Koczan, Z., & Lian, W. (2017, September 8). Routinisation, globalisation, and the fall in labour’s share of income. VoxEu.org.

  • De Jong, E. (2013). Culture and economics: On values, economics and international business. London: Routledge, Routledge Advanced Texts in Economics and Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Long, B. (2016). A brief history of modern inequality. World Economic Forum and Project Syndicate.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiCaprio, A. (2012). Introduction: The role of elites in economic development. In A. H. Amsden, A. DiCaprio, & J. A. Robinson (Eds.), The role of elites in economic development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • European Union Global Strategy. (2016). Shared vision, common action: A stronger Europe. A global strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favero, C. A., & Galasso, V. (2015). Demographics and the secular stagnation hypothesis in Europe (CEPR, DP10887).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, R., & Rodrik, D. (1991). Resistance to reform: Status quo bias in the presence of individual-specific uncertainty. American Economic Review, 81(5), 1146–1155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J. (2014). How to address inequality (Vox CEPR, Policy Portal VoxEu.org).

  • Frey, B. S. (2011). Political economy: Success or failure? (CESIfo Working Paper, No. 3684).

    Google Scholar 

  • Funke, M., Schularick, M., & Trebesch, C. (2015). The political aftermath of financial crises: Going to extremes (Vox CEPR, Policy Portal, VoxEu.org).

  • Gade, Τ., Salines, M., Glöckler, G., & Strodthoff, S. (2013). Loose lips sinking markets? The impact of political communication on sovereign bond spreads (Occasional Paper Series, No. 150).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, R., Mulligan, C. B., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004). Do democracies have different public policies than nondemocracies? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 51–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradstein, M., & Milanovic, B. (2004). Does Liberte Égalité? A survey of the empirical evidence on the links between political democracy and income inequality. Journal of Economic Surveys, 18(4), 515–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G., & Helpman, E. (2001). Special interest politics. Cambridge and London, UK: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herwartz, H., & Theilen, B. (2014). On the political and fiscal determinants of income redistribution under federalism and democracy: Evidence from Germany. Public Choice, 159, 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. F. (1997). Modernization and postmodernazation: Changing values and political styles in advanced industrial society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. F., & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash (Harvard Kennedy School Research Working Paper Series, RWP16-026).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong-a-Pin, R. (2009). On the measurement of political instability and its impact on economic growth. European Journal of Political Economy, 25, 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kharas, H. (2010). The emerging middle class in developing countries. OECD Development Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kormendi, R. C., & Mcguire, P. G. (1985). Macroeconomic determinants of growth: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Monetary Economics, 16(2), 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindert, P. H. (1994). The rise of social spending, 1880–1930. Explorations in Economic History, 31(1), 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsiliani, L., & Renstrom, T. (2004). Political institutions and economic growth. Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/p/mmf/mmfc05/53.html.

  • Mavrocordatos, G. (2000). Presure groups and democracy. Athens: Pataki Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, A. M., & Richard, S. F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 914–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 542–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2013). The 2012 Stein Rokkan lecture: “Three Decades of Populist Radical Right Parties in Western Europe: So What?”. European Journal of Political Research, 52(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action, Harvard Economic Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations: Economic growth, stagflation and social rigidities. New Have: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papaioannou, E., & Siourounis, G. (2008). Democratization and growth. Retrieved from http://econ.uop.gr/~econ/RePEc/pdf/MS2005647democ_and_growth.pdf.

  • Pereira, C., & Teles, K. V. (2008). Political institutions matter for incipient but not for consolidated democracies: A political economic analysis of economic growth. Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/p/anp/en2008/200807211539390.html.

  • Perotti, R. (1992). Income distribution, politics, and growth. American Economic Review, American Economic Association, 82(2), 311–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2001). Political institutions and policy outcomes: What are the stylized facts? Retrieved from www.cepr.org/meets/wkcn/1/1450/papers/Tabellini.pdf.

  • Petrakis, P. E., Papadakis, E., & Daniilopoulou, N. (2012). Public statements on sovereign yield spreads: The Greek case. Cyprus Economic Policy Review, 6(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prat, A., & Strömberg, D. (2013). The political economy of mass media, advances in economics and econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1999). Democracies pay higher wages. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 707–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (2000). Institutions for high-quality growth: What they are and how to Acquire them. Studies in Comparative International Development, 35(3), 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (2015). Premature deindustrialization (NBER Working Paper, No. 20935).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheve, K., & Stasavage, D. (2009). Institutions, partisanship, and inequality in the long run. World Politics, 61, 215–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheve, K., & Stasavage, D. (2010). The conscription of wealth: Mass warfare and the demand for progressive taxation. Inter. Organ, 64, 529–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheve, K., & Stasavage, D. (2012). Democracy, war, and wealth: Lessons from two centuries of inheritance taxation. American Political Science Review, 106(1), 82–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siourounis, G., & Papaioannou, E. (2008). Democratisation and growth. The Economic Journal, 118, 1520–1551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirowy, L., & Inkeles, A. (1990). The effects of democracy on economic growth and inequality: A review. Studies in Comparative International Development, 25, 126–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavares, J., & Wacziarg, R. (2001). How democracy affects growth. European Economic Review, 45, 1341–1378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, S., & Ziegler, M. (2009). Political institutions and human development, does democracy fulfill its “Constructive” and “Instrumental” role? (WBPR Working Paper, No. 4818).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B. (1995). The economic role of political institutions, market-preserving federalism and economic development. Journal of Law, Economic & Organization, 11(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G., Duncan, A., Landell-Mills, P., & Unsworth, S. (2008). Politics and growth: An analytical framework, politics and growth. London, UK: The Policy Practice Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

    Panagiotis E. Petrakis

Authors
  1. Panagiotis E. Petrakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Panagiotis E. Petrakis .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Petrakis, P.E. (2020). Politics and Governance. In: Theoretical Approaches to Economic Growth and Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50068-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50068-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50067-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50068-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation