Skip to main content

On the Decision Tree Complexity of Threshold Functions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Science – Theory and Applications (CSR 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12159))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 729 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we study decision tree models with various types of queries. For a given function it is usually not hard to determine the complexity in the standard decision tree model (each query evaluates a variable). However in more general settings showing tight lower bounds is substantially harder. Threshold functions often have non-trivial complexity in such models and can be used to provide interesting examples.

Standard decision trees can be viewed as a computational model in which each query depends on only one input bit. In the first part of the paper we consider natural generalization of standard decision tree model: we address decision trees that are allowed to query any function depending on two input bits. We show the first lower bound of the form \(n-o(n)\) for an explicit function (namely, the majority function) in this model. We also show that in the decision tree model with AND and OR queries of arbitrary fan-in the complexity of the majority function is \(n-1\).

In the second part of the paper we address parity decision trees that are allowed to query arbitrary parities of input bits. There are various lower bound techniques for parity decision trees complexity including analytical techniques (degree over \(\mathbb {F}_2\), Fourier sparsity, granularity) and combinatorial techniques (generalizations of block sensitivity and certificate complexity). These techniques give tight lower bounds for many natural functions. We give a new inductive argument tailored specifically for threshold functions. A combination of this argument with granularity lower bound allows us to provide a simple example of a function for which all previously known lower bounds are not tight.

The paper is partially supported by RFBR Grant 18-01-00822 and by HSE University Basic Research Program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ben-Asher, Y., Newman, I.: Decision trees with Boolean threshold queries. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 51(3), 495–502 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.1995.1085

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Buhrman, H., de Wolf, R.: Complexity measures and decision tree complexity: a survey. Theor. Comput. Sci. 288(1), 21–43 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3975(01)00144-X

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Eppstein, D., Hirschberg, D.S.: From discrepancy to majority. Algorithmica 80(4), 1278–1297 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-017-0303-7

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Gröger, H.D., Turán, G.: On linear decision trees computing Boolean functions. In: Albert, J.L., Monien, B., Artalejo, M.R. (eds.) ICALP 1991. LNCS, vol. 510, pp. 707–718. Springer, Heidelberg (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54233-7_176

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Hatami, H., Hosseini, K., Lovett, S.: Structure of protocols for XOR functions. In: IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2016, Hyatt Regency, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA, 9–11 October 2016, pp. 282–288 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS.2016.38

  6. Hatami, P., Kulkarni, R., Pankratov, D.: Variations on the sensitivity conjecture. Theory Comput. Grad. Surv. 4, 1–27 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4086/toc.gs.2011.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang, H.: Induced subgraphs of hypercubes and a proof of the sensitivity conjecture. CoRR abs/1907.00847 (2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.00847

  8. Jukna, S.: Boolean Function Complexity - Advances and Frontiers. Algorithms and Combinatorics, vol. 27. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24508-4

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Knop, D., Pilipczuk, M., Wrochna, M.: Tight complexity lower bounds for integer linear programming with few constraints. In: 36th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, STACS 2019, Berlin, Germany, 13–16 March 2019, pp. 44:1–44:15 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2019.44

  10. Kushilevitz, E., Nisan, N.: Communication Complexity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lovász, L., Saks, M.E.: Lattices, Möbius functions and communication complexity. In: 29th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, White Plains, New York, USA, 24–26 October 1988, pp. 81–90 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1988.21924

  12. O’Donnell, R.: Analysis of Boolean Functions. Cambridge University Press (2014). http://www.cambridge.org/de/academic/subjects/computer-science/algorithmics-complexity-computer-algebra-and-computational-g/analysis-boolean-functions

  13. Posobin, G.: Computing majority with low-fan-in majority queries. CoRR abs/1711.10176 (2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.10176

  14. Zhang, Z., Shi, Y.: On the parity complexity measures of Boolean functions. Theor. Comput. Sci. 411(26–28), 2612–2618 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2010.03.027

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Alexander Kulikov for useful discussions on parity decision tree complexity.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir V. Podolskii .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chistopolskaya, A., Podolskii, V.V. (2020). On the Decision Tree Complexity of Threshold Functions. In: Fernau, H. (eds) Computer Science – Theory and Applications. CSR 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12159. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50026-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50026-9_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50025-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50026-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics