Abstract
In this paper we study decision tree models with various types of queries. For a given function it is usually not hard to determine the complexity in the standard decision tree model (each query evaluates a variable). However in more general settings showing tight lower bounds is substantially harder. Threshold functions often have non-trivial complexity in such models and can be used to provide interesting examples.
Standard decision trees can be viewed as a computational model in which each query depends on only one input bit. In the first part of the paper we consider natural generalization of standard decision tree model: we address decision trees that are allowed to query any function depending on two input bits. We show the first lower bound of the form \(n-o(n)\) for an explicit function (namely, the majority function) in this model. We also show that in the decision tree model with AND and OR queries of arbitrary fan-in the complexity of the majority function is \(n-1\).
In the second part of the paper we address parity decision trees that are allowed to query arbitrary parities of input bits. There are various lower bound techniques for parity decision trees complexity including analytical techniques (degree over \(\mathbb {F}_2\), Fourier sparsity, granularity) and combinatorial techniques (generalizations of block sensitivity and certificate complexity). These techniques give tight lower bounds for many natural functions. We give a new inductive argument tailored specifically for threshold functions. A combination of this argument with granularity lower bound allows us to provide a simple example of a function for which all previously known lower bounds are not tight.
The paper is partially supported by RFBR Grant 18-01-00822 and by HSE University Basic Research Program.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ben-Asher, Y., Newman, I.: Decision trees with Boolean threshold queries. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 51(3), 495–502 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.1995.1085
Buhrman, H., de Wolf, R.: Complexity measures and decision tree complexity: a survey. Theor. Comput. Sci. 288(1), 21–43 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3975(01)00144-X
Eppstein, D., Hirschberg, D.S.: From discrepancy to majority. Algorithmica 80(4), 1278–1297 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-017-0303-7
Gröger, H.D., Turán, G.: On linear decision trees computing Boolean functions. In: Albert, J.L., Monien, B., Artalejo, M.R. (eds.) ICALP 1991. LNCS, vol. 510, pp. 707–718. Springer, Heidelberg (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54233-7_176
Hatami, H., Hosseini, K., Lovett, S.: Structure of protocols for XOR functions. In: IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2016, Hyatt Regency, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA, 9–11 October 2016, pp. 282–288 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS.2016.38
Hatami, P., Kulkarni, R., Pankratov, D.: Variations on the sensitivity conjecture. Theory Comput. Grad. Surv. 4, 1–27 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4086/toc.gs.2011.004
Huang, H.: Induced subgraphs of hypercubes and a proof of the sensitivity conjecture. CoRR abs/1907.00847 (2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.00847
Jukna, S.: Boolean Function Complexity - Advances and Frontiers. Algorithms and Combinatorics, vol. 27. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24508-4
Knop, D., Pilipczuk, M., Wrochna, M.: Tight complexity lower bounds for integer linear programming with few constraints. In: 36th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, STACS 2019, Berlin, Germany, 13–16 March 2019, pp. 44:1–44:15 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2019.44
Kushilevitz, E., Nisan, N.: Communication Complexity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)
Lovász, L., Saks, M.E.: Lattices, Möbius functions and communication complexity. In: 29th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, White Plains, New York, USA, 24–26 October 1988, pp. 81–90 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1988.21924
O’Donnell, R.: Analysis of Boolean Functions. Cambridge University Press (2014). http://www.cambridge.org/de/academic/subjects/computer-science/algorithmics-complexity-computer-algebra-and-computational-g/analysis-boolean-functions
Posobin, G.: Computing majority with low-fan-in majority queries. CoRR abs/1711.10176 (2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.10176
Zhang, Z., Shi, Y.: On the parity complexity measures of Boolean functions. Theor. Comput. Sci. 411(26–28), 2612–2618 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2010.03.027
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Alexander Kulikov for useful discussions on parity decision tree complexity.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chistopolskaya, A., Podolskii, V.V. (2020). On the Decision Tree Complexity of Threshold Functions. In: Fernau, H. (eds) Computer Science – Theory and Applications. CSR 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12159. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50026-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50026-9_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50025-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50026-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)