Abstract
To counter information overflow, social media companies employ recommender algorithms that potentially lead to filter bubbles. This leaves users’ newsfeed vulnerable to misinformation and might not provide them with a view of the full spectrum of news. There is research on the reaction of users confronted with filter bubbles and tools to avoid them, but it is not much known about the users’ awareness of the phenomenon. We conducted a survey about the usage of Facebook’s newsfeed with 140 participants from Germany and identified two user groups with k-means clustering. One group consisting of passive Facebook users was not very aware of the issue, while users of the other group, mainly heavy professional Facebook users were more aware and more inclined to apply avoidance strategies. Especially users who were aware of filter bubbles wished for a tool to counter them. We recommend targeting users of the first group to increase awareness and find out more about the way professionals use Facebook to assist them countering the filter bubble and promoting tools that help them do so.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
References
Barberá, P., et al.: Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychol. Sci. 26(10), 1531–1542 (2015)
Barnier, J.: rmdformats: HTML Output Formats and Templates for ‘rmarkdown’ Documents. R package version 0.3.6 (2019). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rmdformats
Beam, M.A.: Automating the news: how personalized news recommender system design choices impact news reception. Commun. Res. 41(8), 1019–1041 (2014)
Bozdag, E., van den Hoven, J.: Breaking the filter bubble: democracy and design. Ethics Inf. Technol. 17(4), 249–265 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-015-9380-y
Brauner, P., Calero Valdez, A., Philipsen, R., Ziefle, M.: Defective still deflective – how correctness of decision support systems influences user’s performance in production environments. In: Nah, F.-H., Tan, C.-H. (eds.) HCIBGO 2016. LNCS, vol. 9752, pp. 16–27. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39399-5_2
Burbach, L., Halbach, P., Ziefle, M., Calero Valdez, A.: Bubble trouble: strategies against filter bubbles in online social networks. In: Duffy, V.G. (ed.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11582, pp. 441–456. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22219-2_33
Valdez, A.C.: rmdtemplates: RMD Templates. R package version 0.1.0.0 (2019)
Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., Arvidsson, A.: Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. J. Commun. 64(2), 317–332 (2014)
Dillahunt, T.R., Brooks, C.A., Gulati, S.; Detecting and visualizing filter bubbles in Google and Bing. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1851–1856. ACM (2015)
Dubois, E., Blank, G.: The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Inf. Commun. Soc. 21(5), 729–745 (2018)
Festinger, L.: Cognitive dissonance. Sci. Am. 207(4), 93–106 (1962)
Haim, M., Graefe, A., Brosius, H.-B.: Burst of the filter bubble? Effects of personalization on the diversity of Google News. Dig. Journal. 6(3), 330–343 (2018)
Kumar, J., Tintarev, N.: Using visualizations to encourage blind-spot exploration. In: IntRS@ RecSys, pp. 53–60 (2018)
Mohan, K.: Web site vistor incentive program in conjunction with promotion of anonymously identifying a user and/or a group. US Patent App. 10/787,990, September 2005
Munson, S.A., Lee, S.Y., Resnick, P.: Encouraging reading of diverse political viewpoints with a browser widget. In: Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2013)
Nagulendra, S., Vassileva, J.: Understanding and controlling the filter bubble through interactive visualization: a user study. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, pp. 107–115. ACM (2014)
Nguyen, C.T.: Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles. In: Episteme, pp. 1–21 (2018)
Nickerson, R.S.: Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2(2), 175–220 (1998)
Pariser, E.: The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding From You. Penguin (2011)
Quattrociocchi, W., Scala, A., Sunstein, C.R.: Echo chambers on Facebook, SSRN 2795110 (2016)
Resnick, P., et al.: Bursting your (filter) bubble: strategies for promoting diverse exposure. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion, pp. 95–100. ACM (2013)
Revelle, W.: Psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. R package version 1.9.12.31 (2020). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
Van Aelst, P., et al.: Political communication in a high-choice media environment: a challenge for democracy? Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc. 41(1), 3–27 (2017)
Vozalis, E., Margaritis, E.G.: Analysis of recommender systems algorithms. In: The 6th Hellenic European Conference on Computer Mathematics & its Applications, pp. 732–745 (2003)
Wickham, H.: Tidyverse: Easily Install and Load the ‘Tidyverse’. R package version 1.3.0 (2019). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyverse
Wickham, H., Seidel, D.: Scales: Scale Functions for Visualization. R package version 1.1.0 (2019). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=scales
Xie, Y.: Knitr: A General-Purpose Package for Dynamic Report Generation in R. R package version 1.27 (2020). https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=knitr
Xing, X., Meng, W., Doozan, D., Feamster, N., Lee, W., Snoeren, A.C.: Exposing inconsistent web search results with bobble. In: Faloutsos, M., Kuzmanovic, A. (eds.) PAM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8362, pp. 131–140. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04918-2_13
Zhu, H.: KableExtra: Construct Complex Table with ‘kable’ and Pipe Syntax. R package version 1.1.0 (2019). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=kableExtra
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Plettenberg, N. et al. (2020). User Behavior and Awareness of Filter Bubbles in Social Media. In: Duffy, V. (eds) Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. Human Communication, Organization and Work. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12199. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49907-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49907-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49906-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49907-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)