Advertisement

Choosing the Most Suitable Classifier for Supporting Assistive Technology Adoption in People with Parkinson’s Disease: A Fuzzy Multi-criteria Approach

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 12199)

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder which requires a long-term, interdisciplinary disease management. While there remains no cure for Parkinson’s disease, treatments are available to help reduce the main symptoms and maintain quality of life for as long as possible. Owing to the global burden faced by chronic conditions such as PD, Assistive technologies (AT’s) are becoming an increasingly common prescribed form of treatment. Low adoption is hampering the potential of digital technologies within health and social care. It is then necessary to employ classification algorithms have been developed for differentiating adopters and non-adopters of these technologies; thereby, potential negative effects on people with PD and cost overruns can be further minimized. This paper bridges this gap by extending the Multi-criteria decision-making approach adopted in technology adoption modeling for people with dementia. First, the fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) is applied to estimate the initial relative weights of criteria and sub-criteria. Then, the Decision-making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) is used for evaluating the interrelations and feedback among criteria and sub-criteria. The Technique for Order of Preferences by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is finally implemented to rank three classifiers (Lazy IBk – knearest neighbors, Naïve bayes, and J48 decision tree) according to their ability to model technology adoption. A real case study considering is presented to validate the proposed approach.

Keywords

Parkinson’s disease (PD) Technology adoption Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) Healthcare 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research has received funding under the REMIND project Marie Sklodowska-Curie EU Framework for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020, under Grant Agreement No. 734355. The authors also acknowledge the contribution of users of the Parkinson mPower app as part of the mPower project developed by Sage Bionetworks and described in Synapse [ https://doi.org/10.7303/syn4993293].

References

  1. 1.
    The World Health Organisation, “Global Health Observatory (GHO) data”. https://www.who.int/gho/mortality_burden_disease/life_tables/situation_trends_text/en/. Accessed 10 Mar 2020
  2. 2.
    The World Health Organisation: The world health report 2002: reducing risks, promoting healthy life. 1st edn. World Health Organisation, Geneva (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    NHS Inform: Parkinsons disease in Illnesses, conditions and disorders of the nerves and central nervous system. https://www.nhsinform.scot/illnesses-and-conditions/brain-nerves-and-spinal-cord/parkinsons-disease. Accessed 10 Mar 2020
  4. 4.
    Cook, E.J., et al.: Exploring the factors that influence the decision to adopt and engage with an integrated assistive telehealth and telecare service in Cambridgeshire, UK: a nested qualitative study of patient ‘users’ and ‘non-users’. BMC Health Serv. Res. 16(137), 1–20 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ortiz-Barrios, M., Nugent, C., Cleland, I., Donnelly, M., Verikas, A.: Selecting the most suitable classification algorithm for supporting assistive technology adoption for people with dementia: a multicriteria framework. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 27(1–2), 20–38 (2019)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klucken, J., Krüger, R., Schmidt, P., Bloem, B.R.: Management of Parkinson’s disease 20 years from now: towards digital health pathways. J. Parkinson’s Dis. 8(Suppl 1), S85–S94 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hansen, C., Sanchez-Ferro, A., Maetzler, W.: How mobile health technology and electronic health records will change care of patients with Parkinson’s disease. J. Parkinson’s Dis. 8(Suppl 1), S41–S45 (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marxreiter, F., et al.: The use of digital technology and media in German Parkinson’s disease patients. J. Parkinson’s Dis. pp. 1–11 (2019, in press)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Espay, A.J., et al.: A roadmap for implementation of patient-centered digital outcome measures in Parkinson’s disease obtained using mobile health technologies. Mov. Disord. 34(5), 657–663 (2019)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Amini, A., Banitsas, K., Young, W.R.: Kinect4FOG: monitoring and improving mobility in people with Parkinson’s using a novel system incorporating the Microsoft Kinect v2. Disabil. Rehabil.: Assist. Technol. 14(6), 566–573 (2019)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cunningham, L.M., Nugent, C.D., Finlay, D.D., Moore, G., Craig, D.: A review of assistive technologies for people with Parkinson’s disease. Technol. Health Care 17(3), 269–279 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chaurasia, P., et al.: Modelling assistive technology adoption for people with dementia. J. Biomed. Inform. 63, 235–248 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guneri, A.F., Gul, M., Ozgurler, S.: A fuzzy AHP methodology for selection of risk assessment methods in occupational safety. Int. J. Risk Assess. Manag. 18(3–4), 319–335 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ortiz-Barrios, M.A., et al.: The analytic decision-making preference model to evaluate the disaster readiness in emergency departments: the ADT model. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 24(5–6), 204–226 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ortiz-Barrios, M.A., Herrera-Fontalvo, Z., Rúa-Muñoz, J., Ojeda-Gutiérrez, S., De Felice, F., Petrillo, A.: An integrated approach to evaluate the risk of adverse events in hospital sector. Manag. Decis. 56(10), 2187–2224 (2018)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ak, M.F., Gul, M.: AHP–TOPSIS integration extended with Pythagorean fuzzy sets for information security risk analysis. Complex Intell. Syst. 5(2), 113–126 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-018-0087-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bot, B.M., et al.: The mPower study, Parkinson disease mobile data collected using ResearchKit. Sci. Data 3(1), 1–9 (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ali Hamad, R., Salguero, A.G., Bouguelia, M.R., Espinilla, M., Quero, J.M.: Efficient activity recognition in smart homes using delayed fuzzy temporal windows on binary sensors. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 24(2), 387–395 (2019)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Greer, J., Cleland, I., McClean, S.: Predicting assistive technology adoption for people with Parkinson’s disease using mobile data from a smartphone. In: 13th Conference on Data Science and knowledge Engineering for Sensing Decision Support FLINS 2018, pp. 1273–1280. World Scientific, Belfast (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Productivity and InnovationUniversidad de la Costa CUCBarranquillaColombia
  2. 2.School of Computing and MathematicsUlster UniversityJordanstownUK
  3. 3.School of ComputingUlster UniversityNewtownabbeyUK
  4. 4.Department of EngineeringUniversity of Napoli “Parthenope”NaplesItaly
  5. 5.Department of Industrial EngineeringInstitución Universitaria ITSABarranquillaColombia

Personalised recommendations