Skip to main content

Fatigue Reliability of Structures: Methodology of Assessment and Problems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Problems in Mechanics (APM 2019)

Abstract

Fatigue reliability assessment of metallic structures in various applications according current design codes is based mostly on S-N criteria with uncertain characterization of fatigue properties of a particular material and the assumed damage. In case the crack is detected residual service life as recommended may be estimated by applying the Linear fracture mechanics techniques, again, with incomplete defining conditions of the crack growth and exhaustion of life.

Proposed earlier procedure of simulation the fatigue process based on the due finite element modeling of the affected area of a structure, application of the damage summation technique and appropriate criterion for fatigue failure of material allowed assessment of fatigue life from the onset of service loading up to development of a critical state, e.g. of the through crack in a structural component. Also, it was shown that the simulation scheme was capable of account the heterogeneity of the material structure fatigue resistance, the crack closure effects and elastic-plastic material response when the Strain-life criterion for fatigue failure was applied.

However, selection of the criterion for fatigue failure of material is but a straightforward decision: it is shown that S-N criterion even attributed to the same structural steel class as the Strain-life one does not provide in analysis of the fatigue process even an approximate convergence. This is mostly due to fairly indirect considering the inelastic properties of fatigue damage in S-N criteria and the methodology of fatigue testing specimens aimed at evaluation of S-N and \(\Delta \varepsilon \)-N criteria.

Further, the approach would need in more comparisons of simulated and test data in different structural applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Petinov, S.V., Guchinsky, R.V. Finite-element modeling of the semi-elliptical fatigue crack growth by the damage accumulation approach. In: Proceedings of the XLII International Summer School - Conference Advanced Problems in Mechanics, SPb-Repino, IPME RAS, pp. 296–306 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Guchinsky, R.V., Petinov, S.V.: Two-dimensional surface fatigue crack propagation and its finite element simulation. In: Applied Mechanics and Materials, Ch. 5, vol. 725–726, pp. 654–661 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Imran, M., Siddique, S., Guchinsky, R.V., Petinov, S.V., Walther, F.: Comparison of fatigue life assessment by analytical, experimental and damage accumulation modeling approach for steel SAE 1045. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 39(9), 1138–1149 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Veritas, D.N.: Fatigue Assessment of Ship Structures. Classification Notes 30.7, Hovik, Norway (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Petinov, S.V., Thayamballi, A.K.: The application of S-N Curves considering mismatch of stress concentration between test specimen and structure. J. Ship Res. 42(1), 68 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Petinov, S.V., Reemsnyder, H.S. and Thayamballi, A.K.: The similitude of fatigue damage principle: application in S-N curves-based fatigue design. In: Marquis, G., Solin, J. (ed.) Fatigue Design and Reliability, pp. 219–228. ESIS Publication 23. Elsevier Science Ltd (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. EUROCODE 3: Design of Steel Structures. Part 1-9: Fatigue. BS EN 1993-1-9: 2009, p. 36

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bolotin, V.V.: Statistical Methods in Structural Mechanics. Holden-Day, San-Francisco (1969)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Glinka, G.A.: Cumulative model of fatigue crack growth. Int. J. Fatigue 4, 59–67 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ellyin, F., Fakinlede, C.O.: Probabilistic simulation of fatigue crack growth by damage accumulation. Eng. Fract. Mech. 22(4), 697–712 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fatemi, A., Plaseid, A., Khosrovaneh, A.K., Tanner, D.: Application of bi-linear log-log S-N model to strain-controlled fatigue data of aluminum alloys and its effect on life predictions. Int. J. Fatigue 27, 1040–1050 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruslan V. Guchinsky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Guchinsky, R.V., Petinov, S.V. (2020). Fatigue Reliability of Structures: Methodology of Assessment and Problems. In: Indeitsev, D., Krivtsov, A. (eds) Advanced Problems in Mechanics. APM 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49882-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49882-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49881-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49882-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics