Skip to main content

A Usability Testing Comparing Two Mobile Phone Gimbals

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design, User Experience, and Usability. Design for Contemporary Interactive Environments (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12201))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3830 Accesses


In this study, we compared two Mobile Phone Gimbals from DJI and MOZA to investigate usability issues and access which product has better usability and provide iterative recommendations for Mobile Phone Gimbal. The study was conducted from May to June 2019 based on the principle of effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction in ISO 9241-11 [1]. Then the usability test was carried out in three parts: task design, test exclusion and data statistic. 6 subjects were asked to complete five tasks with two gimbals following the principle of think aloud protocols and given a short interview to measure their satisfaction. Results indicate that there is a usability issue of installing and balancing in novice users in both products. OSMO has simple buttons, which is easier for the novice, but users have to tap the screen of mobile phone to complete some tasks. On the contrary, MOZA enables users to operate with single hand all the time by more buttons, but it is too complicated for the novice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Bevan, N., Carter, J., Harker, S.: ISO 9241-11 revised: what have we learnt about usability since 1998? In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9169, pp. 143–151. Springer, Cham (2015).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Jordan, P.W.: An Introduction to Usability, 1st edn. CRC Press, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Albert, W., Tullis, T.: Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. DJI Technology. Accessed 27 Jan 2020

  5. Measuring Usability with the USE Questionnaire. Accessed 27 Jan 2020

  6. DJI Technology. Accessed 27 Jan 2020

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keke Zhong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhong, K., Liu, J., Gui, Z., Meng, C., Soares, M.M. (2020). A Usability Testing Comparing Two Mobile Phone Gimbals. In: Marcus, A., Rosenzweig, E. (eds) Design, User Experience, and Usability. Design for Contemporary Interactive Environments. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12201. Springer, Cham.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49759-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49760-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics