Abstract
Deploying Learning Analytics that significantly improve learning outcomes remains a challenge. Motivation has been found to be related to academic achievement and is argued to play an essential role in efficient learning. We developed a Learning Analytics dashboard and designed an intervention that relies on goal orientation and social comparison. Subjects can see a prediction of their final grade in a course as well as how they perform in comparison to classmates with similar goal grades. Those with access to the dashboard ended up more motivated than those without access, outperformed their peers as the course progressed and achieved higher final grades. Our results indicate that learner-oriented dashboards are technically feasible and may have tangible benefits for learners.
Keywords
- Learning Analytics
- Motivation
- Social comparison
- Goal orientation
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options




References
Brouwer, N., Bredeweg, B., Latour, S., Berg, A., van der Huizen, G.: Learning analytics pilot with Coach2 - searching for effective mirroring. In: Verbert, K., Sharples, M., Klobučar, T. (eds.) EC-TEL 2016. LNCS, vol. 9891, pp. 363–369. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_28
Davis, D., Jivet, I., Kizilcec, R.F., Chen, G., Hauff, C., Houben, G.-J.: Follow the successful crowd: raising MOOC completion rates through social comparison at scale. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, pp. 454–463. ACM (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027411
Bodily, R., Verbert, K.: Trends and issues in student-facing learning analytics reporting systems research. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, pp. 309–318. ACM (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027403
Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Siemens, G.: Let’s not forget: learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends 59, 64–71 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0822-x
Schunk, D.H., Zimmerman, B.J.: Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications. Routledge, New York (2012)
Singh, K., Granville, M., Dika, S.: Mathematics and science achievement: effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. J. Educ. Res. 95, 323–332 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596607
Schunk, D.H., Zimmerman, B.J.: Motivation an essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In: Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning, pp. 13–42. Routledge (2012)
Lee, L.H.: Goal orientation, goal setting, and academic performance in college students: An integrated model of achievement motivation in school settings (1998)
Schokker, M.C., et al.: The impact of social comparison information on motivation in patients with diabetes as a function of regulatory focus and self-efficacy. Health Psychol. 29, 438–445 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019878
Festinger, L.: A theory of social comparison processes. Hum. Relat. 7, 117–140 (1954)
Gerber, J.P., Wheeler, L., Suls, J.: A social comparison theory meta-analysis 60+ years on. Psychol. Bull. 144, 177 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000127
Locke, E.A.: Motivation through conscious goal setting. Appl. Prev. Psychol. 5, 117–124 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-1849(96)80005-9
Dantzig, T.: Number, the language of science. Revised and augmented. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 92, 546 (1940)
Tipping, M.E.: Sparse Bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 1, 211–244 (2001)
Meier, Y., Xu, J., Atan, O., van der Schaar, M.: Predicting grades. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 64, 959–972 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2015.2496278
Duncan, T.G., McKeachie, W.J.: The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educ. Psychol. 40, 117–128 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_6
Harrison, G.M., Vallin, L.M.: Evaluating the metacognitive awareness inventory using empirical factor-structure evidence. Metacognition Learn. 13, 15–38 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-017-9176-z
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S.: Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. ArXiv Prepr. ArXiv14065823 (2014)
Berlyne, D.E., Craw, M.A., Salapatek, P.H., Lewis, J.L.: Novelty, complexity, incongruity, extrinsic motivation, and the GSR. J. Exp. Psychol. 66, 560 (1963)
Mutsuddi, A.U., Connelly, K.: Text messages for encouraging physical activity are they effective after the novelty effect wears off? In: 2012 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops, pp. 33–40 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2012.248715
Jeno, L.M., Vandvik, V., Eliassen, S., Grytnes, J.-A.: Testing the novelty effect of an m-learning tool on internalization and achievement: a self-determination theory approach. Comput. Educ. 128, 398–413 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.008
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fleur, D.S., van den Bos, W., Bredeweg, B. (2020). Learning Analytics Dashboard for Motivation and Performance. In: Kumar, V., Troussas, C. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12149. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49663-0_51
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49663-0_51
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49662-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49663-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)