Skip to main content

Workers for Free: Precarious Inclusion and Extended Uncertainty Among Afghan Refugees in Denmark

Part of the Global Diversities book series (GLODIV)

Abstract

This chapter discusses how and at what costs the Danish governments since the 2015 “refugee crisis” (2015) have managed the inclusion of refugees in the labor market and celebrated it as successful integration. However, refugees have become a cheap labor reserve for private companies and fear that they might risk being deported to Afghanistan if they do not fulfill the integration program. Drawing on a qualitative research and presenting an emic perspective, we explore how the different internship programs are experienced among recently arrived Afghan refugees. This chapter contends that the statistical representation of successful integration in the Danish labor market is a simplified representation of complicated realities. Further, it may be counterproductive and create a new precarious subclass of insecure, underpaid workers with constrained mobility.

Keywords

  • Precarity, Inclusion, Integration, Afghans, Refugees, Denmark

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-49598-5_9
  • Chapter length: 23 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-49598-5
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Notes

  1. 1.

    This agreement states that a job is the key to integration, making it essential to introduce refugees to the labor market so they become a resource instead of a burden upon society. (See http://www.stm.dk/_p_14312.html; https://www.kl.dk/kommunale-opgaver/integration/politiske-aftaler/)

  2. 2.

    The numbers refer to refugees between ages 21 and 64. The 43% covers both “real” jobs and jobs subsided by the welfare state. https://integrationsbarometer.dk/aktuelt/7

  3. 3.

    The data was collected as part of an interdisciplinary research project in the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Germany and Denmark exploring the opportunities available for recently arrived Afghans (see https://snis.ch/project/engendering-migration-development-and-belonging-the-experiences-of-recently-arrived-afghans-in-europe/). We thank the editors and our colleagues Zachary Whyte, Anja Simonsen, Michala Clante Bendixen, Martin Lemberg-Pedersen, Nicholas Van Hear, Carolin Fischer, Anna Wyzz and Esra Kaytaz for reading and commenting upon the chapter. Earlier versions were presented in the conference “Exploring Dimensions of Afghan Migration to Europe: Experiences, Discourse and Politics” at Moesgaard Museum, Aarhus University, in February 2019, and at the annual IMISCO-conference in Malmö, June 2019.

  4. 4.

    Interviews were conducted by Narges Ghandchi in different regions of Denmark. Interviewees were informed of the study objects as well as of their rights to participate, be anonymized, leave uninterested questions unanswered, and withdraw their consents during and/or after the interviews.

  5. 5.

    In 2015, Denmark started deporting rejected asylum seekers from Afghanistan. In 2015, 56 individuals returned voluntarily while 34 were deported. In 2016, 36 individuals returned voluntarily while 16 were deported. In 2017, 147 individuals returned voluntarily and 14 were deported (see https://www.ecre.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Returns-Case-Study-on-Afghanistan.pdf.; NOAS 2018).

  6. 6.

    https://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/docs/ELECTRONIC/100584/120905/F-1089919270/DNK100584DanishConsolidation.pdf

  7. 7.

    http://refugees.dk/fakta/integration-job-uddannelse/integrationsydelse/

  8. 8.

    http://uim.dk/filer/integration/integrationskontrakt-og-integrationserklaering/integrationserklaering-engelsk.pdf

  9. 9.

    Generally, the minimum wages are negotiated every second or third year between the Confederation of Danish Employers and the Unions. This arrangement is often referred to as “The Danish Model.” Normally the Unions will protect the minimum wages, but the Unions are now happy to compromise in this area to help refugees gain a foothold on the labor market.

  10. 10.

    The current Danish integration program is also part of a broader policy of deterrence at the state level. In 2015, Inger Støjberg, Minister for Foreigners and Integration, representing the Liberal Party (V), published commercials in Arabic in Lebanese newspapers to inform potential asylum seekers about the new strict rules and the reduction in state benefits in Denmark. See https://www.altinget.dk/artikel/stoejbergs-flygtninge-annoncer-indrykket-i-libanon

  11. 11.

    The Danish involvement in Afghanistan since 2002 has ranged from military engagement and the training of Afghan national and security forces to the development of infrastructural projects and demining programs, social contributions like support for democracy and civil society, economic growth and employment, the settlement and protection of returnees and internally displaced refugees, and good governance. More recently, an anti-corruption program has also been introduced (openaid.um.dk, fmn.dk). According to the Danish Armed Forces, 9500 Danes had been deployed in Afghanistan by the time Denmark withdrew in 2014 with 43 Danish soldiers losing their lives in this period (Jessen and Fenger-Grøndahl 2013).

  12. 12.

    fmn.dk, http://www.fmn.dk/eng/allabout/Pages/ThedanishengagementinAfghanistan.aspx

  13. 13.

    See “Danmark i strid med Afghanistan om afviste flygtninge” (Berlingske Tidende, Ole Damkjær, 20. March, 2015) and “Rejse ind i natten” (Information, Carsten Jensen, 20. October, 2016).

  14. 14.

    Amnesty International, Afghanistan: “Forced back to danger” Asylum-seekers returned from Europe to Afghanistan, October 2017 (p. 41).

  15. 15.

    https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/politik/kommuner-faar-millionbonus-flere-flygtninge-i-arbejde; http://uim.dk/filer/integration/orienteringsskrivelse-l-189.pdf

  16. 16.

    Trampoline House is a volunteer-based community center where refugees, asylum seekers and other citizens meet, network and participate in social and cultural activities. (https://www.trampolinehouse.dk/press-and-videos/)

  17. 17.

    A grassroots organization set up to assist refugees to network and give them opportunities for life, work and social engagement (the actual name has been anonymized).

  18. 18.

    It is legal caseworkers in Udlændingestyrelsen that, based on criteria defined by the Folketing (Parliament), assess every single case and decide whether a refugee’s residency permit should be extended or terminated.

  19. 19.

    https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/udland/forstaa-sagen-derfor-kan-somaliere-pludselig-sendes-hjem

References

  • Abu-Lughod, Lila. 2013. Do Muslim Women Need Saving? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bruun, Maja H., Mikkel Rytter, and Stine Krøijer. 2017. Selvstændighedssamfundet: antropologiske perspektiver på velfærdsstatens kontinuitet og forandring. In Konkurrencestaten og dens kritikere, ed. Søren K. Andersen, 385–406. København: Djøf Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, Heaven, and Dimitris Skleparis. 2018. Refugees, Migrants, Neither, Both: Categorical Fetishism and the Politics of Bounding in Europe’s ‘Migration Crisis’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (1): 48–64.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Damkjær, Ole. 2015. Danmark i strid med Afghanistan om afviste flygtninge. Berlingske Tidende, 20 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dansk Flygtningehjælp. 2017. Tilbagevenden til Afghanistan. Tema Rapport, oktober 2017. https://flygtning.dk/media/3886281/tilbagevenden-til-afghanistan-2017.pdf

  • De Genova, Nicholas. 2016. The ‘Native’s Point of View’ in the Anthropology of Migration. Anthropological Theory 16 (2–3): 227–240.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ejrnæs, Morten. 2002. Etniske minoriteters tilpasning til livet i Danmark – forholdet mellem majoritetssamfundet og etniske minoriteter. Aalborg Universitet: AMID, Institut for Historie, Internationale Studier og Samfundsforhold, Aalborg Universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2002 [1975]. Overvågning og straf. fængslets fødsel. København: Det lille Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. Selected Essays. New York: Basic Book Inc. Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullestad, Marianne. 2006. Plausible Prejudice: Everyday Experiences and Social Images of Nation, Culture, and Race. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hervik, Peter. 2011. The Annoying Difference: The Emergence of Danish Neonationalism, Neoracism, and Populism in the Post-1989 World. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, Helle Kongsted. 2017. “It’s Like a Roller Coaster Ride”: et antropologisk studie af medrejsende kvinders oplevelse af at bosætte sig i Danmark. Unpublished MA-thesis in Anthropology, Aarhus University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvinen, Margareta, and Nanna Mik-Meyer, eds. 2003. At skabe en klient: institutionelle identiteter i socialt arbejde. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessen, Ole, and Malene Fenger-Grøndahl. 2013. Afghanistan – kampen om demokratiet. København: Informations Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöhncke, Steffen, Mette Nordahl Svendsen and Susan Whyte. 2004. Løsningsmodeller: Sociale teknologier som antropologisk arbejdsfelt. In Viden om verden: en grundbog i antropologisk analyse, Kirsten, Hastrup, 385–407. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsen, Marry-Anne. 2015. Precarious Inclusion: Irregular Migration, Practices of Care, and State B/ordering in Norway. AIT OSLO AS / University of Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosravi, Shahram. 2018. A Fragmented Diaspora: Iranians in Sweden. The Nordic Journal of Migration Research 8 (2): 73–81.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lidegaard, Bo. 2018. Danmark i krig. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitets forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, Peter. 2010. Afghanistan: Aid, Armies & Empires. London: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, Pernille. 2017. Everyday Security – A Need to Belong: A Qualitative Study of Well-Educated Syrian Refugees’ Resettlement Process in Denmark. Unpublished MA-thesis in Human Security, Aarhus University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, Sofie. 2017. When ‘Ansvar’ Is Insanely Many Things: An Anthropological Study of ‘Ansvar’ (Responsibility) and Power in the Meeting between Refugees and Employees in the Danish Welfare State. Unpublished MA-thesis in Anthropology, Aarhus University.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAS – Norsk organisasjon for asylsøkere. 2018. Who’s the Strictest? A Mapping of the Afghanistan-Policies in Western European Countries. Rapport. https://www.noas.no/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Afghanistan-notat-på-engelsk.pdf

  • Olwig, Karen Fog, and Karsten Pærregaard, eds. 2011. The Question of Integration: Immigration, Exclusion and the Danish Nation State. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, Karen Fog, Birgitte Romme Larsen, and Mikkel Rytter, eds. 2012. Migration, Family and the Welfare State: Integrating Migrants and Refugees in Scandinavia. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, Ove Kaj. 2011. Konkurrencestaten. København: Hans Reitzels forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, Marianne Holm, and Mikkel Rytter, eds. 2006. Den stille integration: nye fortællinger om at høre til i Danmark. København: C.A. Reitzels Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preis, Ann-Belinda Steen, ed. 1998. Kan vi leve sammen?: Integration mellem politik og praksis. Viborg: Munksgaard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rytter, Mikkel. 2010. The Family of Denmark and ‘The Aliens’: Kinship Images in Danish Integration Politics. Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology 75 (3): 301–322.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Family Upheaval: Generation, Mobility and Relatedness among Pakistani Migrants in Denmark. Oxford/New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Made in Denmark: Refugees, Integration and the Self-Dependent Society. Anthropology Today 34 (3): 12–14.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Writing Against Integration: Danish Imaginaries of Culture, Race and Belonging. Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology 84 (4): 678–697.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rytter, Mikkel, and Andreas Gadeberg Nielsen. 2019. Marriage in the Ruins of War. Intergenerational Hauntings in the Afghan Diaspora. Ethnicities (Onlinefirst). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1468796819896100

  • Schierup, Carl-Ulrik. 1988. Integration?: Indvandrere, kultur og samfund. København: Billesø and Baltzer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, Liza, and Nassim Majidi. 2013. What Happens Post-Deportation? The Experience of Deported Afghans. Migration Studies 1 (2): 221–240.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, Cris. 2017. Audit Culture and the Politics of Responsibility: Beyond Neoliberal Responsibilization. In Competing Responsibilities: The Politics and Ethics of Contemporary Life, ed. Susanna Trnka and Catherine Trundle, 96–117. Durham: Duke University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • SIRI. 2018. Integrationskit – inspiration til den beskæftigelsesrettede indsats. Gode eksempler fra det kommunale landskab. Udlændinge- og Integrationsministeriet, Styrelsen for International Rekruttering og Integration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, Guy. 2011. The Precariat. The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syppli Kohl, Katrine. 2015. Asylaktivering og ambivalens: forvaltningen af asylansøgere på asylcentre. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, The University of Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thuesen, Frederik. 2017. Linguistic Barriers and Bridges: Constructing Social Capital in Ethnically Diverse low-Skill Workplaces. Work, Employment and Society 31 (6): 937–953.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • van Houte, Marieke. 2017. Return Migration to Afghanistan: Moving Back or Moving Forward? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdasco, Andrea. 2019. Communities of Belonging in the Temporariness of the Danish Asylum System: Shalini’s Anchoring Points. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45 (9): 1439–1457.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vitus, Kathrine. 2011. Zones of Indistinction: Family Life in Danish Asylum Centers. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 12 (1): 95–112.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vohnsen, Nina Holm. 2017. The Absurdity of Bureaucracy. How implementation works. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, Zachary. 2011a. Enter the Myopticon: Uncertain Surveillance in the Danish Asylum System. Anthropology Today 27 (3): 18–21.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011b. Asyl, insh’allah. Tro og mistro i det danske asylsystem. In Islam og muslimer i Danmark: religion, identitet og sikkerhed efter 11. september 2001, ed. Marianne Holm Pedersen and Mikkel Rytter, 115–140. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikkel Rytter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rytter, M., Ghandchi, N. (2020). Workers for Free: Precarious Inclusion and Extended Uncertainty Among Afghan Refugees in Denmark. In: McKowen, K., Borneman, J. (eds) Digesting Difference . Global Diversities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49598-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49598-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49597-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49598-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)