Skip to main content

The Everyday, ‘Ordinary’ Citizens, and Ambiguous Governance Affect in Antwerp

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digesting Difference

Part of the book series: Global Diversities ((GLODIV))

Abstract

In Belgium, the rise of the Flemish populist far-right instigated the creation of an affective governance of neighborly interactions and civic dispositions in pluri-ethnic urban spaces. Taking as an extended case the development of a so-called diversity trajectory in Antwerp, this chapter argues that this governance of samenleven (living together) co-opted the populist notion that everyday neighborhood life of ‘ordinary people’ forms a distinct, authentic realm. This construction of everyday life generates contradictory governmental pushes and pulls—fascination, desire, suspicion, indifference—around different categories of residents and vernacular practices of incorporation, which I describe as an oscillation between Romanticist and Enlightenment affect. As a result, actually existing relations between white working-class and Moroccan-background residents—the residents whom governance actors deemed ‘ordinary’ and viewed as authentically immersed in neighborhood life—were unintelligible to governance actors as ethical practices in their own right and dismissed as deficient living together.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The fieldwork on which this chapter is based took place from 2008 to 2010 and was focused on the ethics and politics of samenleven in two Antwerp neighborhoods. In 2011, the new Flemish-nationalist party New Flemish Alliance won the Antwerp municipal elections after over thirty years of socialist rule. My material does not speak to that significant reversal in political power.

  2. 2.

    This dichotomy is a strong simplification of the anthropological debate on morality and ethics. It also does not do justice to the diversity of European philosophical traditions that have explicitly engaged with the notion of the everyday (see for an overview: Gardiner 2002).

  3. 3.

    I had spoken to both men on several occasions, and they had informed me about the presentation of the reconstruction plans. Upon my request to examine the diversity trajectory as an extended case, I was granted permission to follow the steering team’s meetings and access the project documents.

References

  • Arnaut, Karel, Sarah Bracke, Bambi Ceuppens, Sarah De Mul, Nadia Fadil, and Meryem Kanmaz. 2009. Een leeuw in een kooi. De grenzen van het multiculturele Vlaanderen. Antwerpen: Meulenhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, Isaiah. 2000 [1960]. Three Critics of the Enlightenment. London: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyen, Marnix. 2015. Greetings from Borgerokko. An Antwerp Neighborhood as a National Icon of Globalization and Anti-globalism. In Local Memories in a Nationalizing and Globalizing World, ed. Marnix Beyen and Brecht Deseure, 244–257. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceuppens, Bambi. 2003. Congo Made in Flanders? Koloniale Vlaamse visies op “blank” en “zwart” in Belgisch Congo. Gent: Academia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colebrook, Claire. 2002. The Politics and Potential of Everyday Life. New Literary History 33 (4): 687–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, Veena. 2010. Engaging the Life of the Other: Love and Everyday Life. In Ordinary Ethics. Anthropology, Language, and Action, ed. Michael Lambek, 376–399. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Koning, Anouk, and Anick Vollebergh. 2019. Ordinary Icons: Public Discourses and Everyday Lives in an Anxious Europe. American Anthropologist 121 (2): 391–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fadil, Nadia, and Mayanthi Fernando. 2015. Rediscovering the ‘Everyday’ Muslim: Notes on an Anthropological Divide. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5 (2): 59–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortier, Anne-Marie. 2010. Proximity by Design? Affective Citizenship and the Management of Unease. Citizenship Studies 14 (1): 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1995 [1975]. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, Michael. 2002. Critiques of Everyday Life. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geschiere, Peter. 2009. The Perils of Belonging: Autochthony, Citizenship, and Exclusion in Africa and Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gingrich, Andre, and Marcus Banks, eds. 2006. Neo-nationalism in Europe and Beyond. Perspectives from Social Anthropology. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusterson, Hugh. 2017. From Brexit to Trump: Anthropology and the Rise of Nationalist Populism. American Ethnologist 44 (2): 209–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Thomas Blom. 1997. Inside the Romanticist Episteme. Thesis Eleven 48: 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Melancholia of Freedom: Social Life in an Indian Township in South Africa. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haylett, Chris. 2001. Illegitimate Subjects? Abject Whites, Neoliberal Modernization, and Middle-Class Multiculturalism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 19 (3): 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, Roger. 2005. White Backlash and the Politics of Multiculturalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Douglas R. 2000. Integral Europe: Fast-capitalism, Multiculturalism, Neofascism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICM (Interdepartementale Commissie Migranten). 1996. Strategisch plan voor het Vlaamse minderhedenbeleid t.a.v. etnisch-culturele minderheden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalb, Don, and Gábor Halmai. 2011. Headlines of Nation, Subtexts of Class: Working-class Populism and the Return of the Repressed in Neoliberal Europe. New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • KCM (Koninklijk Commissariaat voor het Migrantenbeleid) 1990. Voor een Harmonieuze Sameneleving. Deel I: Eerste realisaties en nieuwe voorstellen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentin, Alana, and Gavan Titley. 2011. The Crises of Multiculturalism: Racism in a Neoliberal Age. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loopmans, Maarten. 2006. From Residents to Neighbors: The Making of Active Citizens in Antwerp, Belgium. In Policy, People and the New Professional, ed. Jan-Willem Duyvendak, Trudie Knijn, and Monique Kremer, 109–121. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mepschen, Paul. 2019. A Discourse of Displacement: Super-diversity, Urban Citizenship, and the Politics of Autochthony in Amsterdam. Ethnic and Racial Studies 42 (1): 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Timothy. 2006. Society, Economy, and the State Effect. In The Anthropology of the State, ed. Aradhana Sharma and Akhil Gupta, 169–186. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muehlebach, Andrea. 2012. The Moral Neoliberal: Welfare and Citizenship in Italy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, Janet, and Evelien Tonkens, eds. 2011. Participation, Responsibility and Choice: Summoning the Active Citizen in Western European Welfare States. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prins, Baukje. 2002. The Nerve to Break Taboos: New Realism in the Dutch Discourse on Multiculturalism. Journal of International Migration and Integration 3 (3–4): 363–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schinkel, Willem, and Marguerite Van den Berg. 2011. City of Exception: The Dutch Revanchist City and the Urban Homo Sacer. Antipode 43 (5): 1911–1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoshan, Nitzan. 2008. Placing the Extremes: Cityscapes, Ethnic ‘Others’ and Young Right-extremists in East-Berlin. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 16 (3): 377–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. The Management of Hate: Nation, Affect, and the Governance of Right-Wing Extremism in Germany. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stad Antwerpen. 2009. Samenleven in diversiteit: Eenheid in verscheidenheid & verscheidenheid in eenheid. Beleidsplan 2009–2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolcke, Verena. 1995. Talking Culture: New Boundaries, New Rhetorics of Exclusion in Europe. Current Anthropology 36 (1): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoler, Ann Laura. 2008. Affective States. In A Companion to the Anthropology of Politics, ed. David Nugent and Joan Vincent, 4–20. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stouthuysen, Patrick, Jan-Willem Duyvendak, and Peter van der Graaf. 1999. Stedelijk beleid in Vlaanderen en Nederland: kansarmoede, sociale cohesie en sociaal kapitaal. Tijdschrift voor sociologie 20 (3–4): 579–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, Katharine. 2017. The suburban paradox of conviviality and racism in postcolonial Britain. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43 (11): 1890–1906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uitermark, Justus. 2003. De sociale controle van achterstandswijken: Een beleidsgenetisch perspectief. Amsterdam: KNAG.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eijk, Gwen. 2012. Good Neighbours in Bad Neighbourhoods: Narratives of Dissociation and Practices of Neighbouring in a ‘Problem’ Place. Urban Studies 49 (14): 3009–3026.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, Steven. 2011. The Cultural Politics of Nation and Migration. Annual Review of Anthropology 40: 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, Steven, and Susanne Wessendorf, eds. 2010. The Multiculturalism Backlash: European Discourses, Policies and Practices. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollebergh, Anick. 2016a. The Other Neighbor Paradox: Fantasies and Frustrations of Living Together in Antwerp. Patterns of Prejudice 50 (2): 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016b. Strange Neighbors: Politics of Living Together in Antwerp. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walley, Christine J. 2017. Trump’s Election and the ‘White Working Class’: What We Missed. American Ethnologist 44 (2): 231–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, Ruth, Majid Khosravinik, and Brigitte Mral, eds. 2013. Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anick Vollebergh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vollebergh, A. (2020). The Everyday, ‘Ordinary’ Citizens, and Ambiguous Governance Affect in Antwerp. In: McKowen, K., Borneman, J. (eds) Digesting Difference . Global Diversities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49598-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49598-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49597-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49598-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics