Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Afterword: The Work of ‘Integration’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digesting Difference

Part of the book series: Global Diversities ((GLODIV))

Abstract

This final chapter reviews the preceding contributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See https://www.bmi.bund.de/DE/themen/heimat-integration/integration/integration-node.html

  2. 2.

    https://www.bamf.de/DE/Themen/Integration/TraegerLehrFachkraefte/TraegerProjektfoerderung/Integrationsprojekte/integrationsprojekte.html

  3. 3.

    https://www.nationaler-aktionsplan-integration.de/napi-de

  4. 4.

    https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-en/news/vor-integrationsgipfel-1726982

  5. 5.

    https://www.muenchen.info/soz/pub/pdf/399_integrationconcept.pdf

  6. 6.

    https://www.stuttgart.de/integration

  7. 7.

    https://www.hamburg.de/integration/service/115238/integrationskonzept/

  8. 8.

    https://www.migrantvoice.org/home/headlines/integration-is-a-two-way-street-060117151302

  9. 9.

    https://www.integrationsaemter.de/Fachlexikon/Integrationsamt/77c439i1p/index.html

References

  • Bendixsen, S., and H. Danielsen. 2020. Hierarchical Forms of Belonging in an Egalitarian Society. In Digesting Difference, ed. K. McKowen and J. Borneman. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertossi, C. 2011. National Models of Integration in Europe: A Comparative and Critical Analysis. American Behavioral Scientist 55 (12): 1561–1580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, R. 2001. The Return of Assimilation? Changing Perspectives on Immigration and its Sequels in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies 24 (4): 531–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Ethnicity Without Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Czollek, M. 2019. Desintegriert Euch! Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favell, A. 1998. Philosophies of Integration: Immigration and the Idea of Citizenship in France and Britain. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Integration Nations: The Nation-State and Research on Immigrants in Western Europe. Comparative Social Research 22: 13–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Integration: Twelve Propositions After Schinkel. Comparative Migration Studies 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-019-0125-7.

  • Finotelli, C., and I. Michalowski. 2012. The Heuristic Potential of Models of Citizenship and Immigrant Integration Reviewed. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 10: 231–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korteweg, A. 2017. The Failures of “Immigrant Integration”: The Gendered Racialized Production of Non-belonging. Migration Studies 5 (3): 428–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayor of London. 2020. Social Integration in London: A Snapshot of the Mayor’s Approach. London: Greater London Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKowen, K., and J. Borneman. 2020. Digesting Difference: Migrants, Refugees, and Incorporation in Europe. In Digesting Difference, ed. K. McKowen and J. Borneman. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, F., and T. Heil. 2020. Deromanticising Integration: On the Importance of Convivial Disintegration. Migration Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnz056.

  • Meissner, F., and S. Vertovec. 2014. Comparing Super-Diversity. Ethnic and Racial Studies 38 (4): 541–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rytter, M. 2019. Writing Against Integration: Danish Imaginaries of Culture, Race and Belonging. Ethnos 84 (4): 678–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, M. n.d. Towards a Differentiated Notion of the Mainstream: Involved Residents, Conceptions of Integration and Strategies of Emplacement in a German Neighbourhood. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schinkel, W. 2017. Imagined Societies: A Critique of Immigrant Integration in Western Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schönwälder, K., and T. Triandafilopoulos. 2016. The New Differentialism: Responses to Immigrant Diversity in Germany. German Politics 25 (3): 366–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schönwälder, K., S. Petermann, J. Hüttermann, S. Vertovec, M. Hewstone, D. Stolle, K. Schmid, and T. Schmitt. 2016. Diversity and Contact: Immigration and Social Interaction in German Cities. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. 2007. Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, T. 1993. Anthropology and Multiculturalism: What Is Anthropology That Multiculturalists Should Be Mindful of It? Cultural Anthropology 8 (4): 411–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Reekum, R., J.W. Duyvendak, and C. Bertossi. 2012. National Models of Integration and the Crisis of Multiculturalism: A Critical Comparative Perspective. Patterns of Prejudice 46 (5): 417–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S., ed. 1999. Migration and Social Cohesion. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. “Diversity” and the Social Imaginary. Archives Européennes de Sociologie/European Journal of Sociology LIII (3): 287–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Talking Around Super-Diversity. Ethnic and Racial Studies 42: 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vollebergh, A. 2020. “The Everyday” and Ambiguous Affect in the Governance of the Diverse Neighborhood in Antwerp. In Digesting Difference, ed. K. McKowen and J. Borneman. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Göttingen, Germany

    Steven Vertovec

Authors
  1. Steven Vertovec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Vertovec .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USA

    Kelly McKowen

  2. Department of Anthropology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA

    John Borneman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vertovec, S. (2020). Afterword: The Work of ‘Integration’. In: McKowen, K., Borneman, J. (eds) Digesting Difference . Global Diversities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49598-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49598-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49597-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49598-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation